On the Economics of Network Interconnections and Net Neutrality

The Internet of symmetric traffic flows between networks and a hierarchical topology, has long given way to one with a significantly asymmteric traffic flows and a flatter topology. The Internet topology of today may be characterised as having three key types of networks—content providers, user access providers, and transit providers. Further, in this Internet, best-effort routing of centrally stored content using distributed protocols has been seen to be inadequate to provide a suitably reliable transport service to provide the requisite quality of service to the end user. Two important developments to mitigate this gap in the capability of the Internet and the needs of modern content are the following. (1) Proliferation of content distribution networks (2) direct peering between content networks and ISPs. In this paper we analyze the economics of such interconnections. Using microeconomic models from industrial organization literature, we first develop the conditions for a content provider to connect directly to a service provider. Further, when such a direct link is indeed sought, we analyze the quality of the link vis-a-vis the default option of using a transit service. We then analyze the content provider market coverage by the content distribution networks. Finally, we discuss the implications of these results on the objectives sought by net neutrality regimes.

[1]  Gwendal Simon,et al.  The Economics of CDNs and Their Impact on Service Fairness , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Network and Service Management.

[2]  Joacim Tåg,et al.  Network Neutrality on the Internet: A Two-Sided Market Analysis , 2011, Inf. Econ. Policy.

[3]  Dan Wang,et al.  Sponsored Data Plan , 2015, SIGMETRICS.

[4]  Gwendal Simon,et al.  Vertical Integration of CDN and Network Operator: Model and Analysis , 2016, 2016 IEEE 24th International Symposium on Modeling, Analysis and Simulation of Computer and Telecommunication Systems (MASCOTS).

[5]  Jerome H. Saltzer,et al.  End-to-end arguments in system design , 1984, TOCS.

[6]  Vishal Misra,et al.  On cooperative settlement between content, transit, and eyeball internet service providers , 2011, TNET.

[7]  Costas Courcoubetis,et al.  Pricing Communication Networks: Economics, Technology and Modelling (Wiley Interscience Series in Systems and Optimization) , 2003 .

[8]  Richard T. B. Ma,et al.  Paid prioritization and its impact on net neutrality , 2017, 2014 IFIP Networking Conference.

[9]  Greg Goth New Internet Economics Might Not Make It to the Edge , 2010, IEEE Internet Comput..

[10]  John Musacchio,et al.  A Two-Sided Market Analysis of Provider Investment Incentives with an Application to the Net-Neutrality Issue , 2009 .

[11]  Peyman Faratin,et al.  Economics of Overlay Networks: An Industrial Organization Perspective on Network Economics , 2007 .

[12]  Yung Yi,et al.  On the competition of CDN companies: Impact of new telco-CDNs' federation , 2016, 2016 14th International Symposium on Modeling and Optimization in Mobile, Ad Hoc, and Wireless Networks (WiOpt).

[13]  Vishal Misra,et al.  Internet Economics: The Use of Shapley Value for ISP Settlement , 2007, IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking.

[14]  Ramayya Krishnan,et al.  Optimal pricing of content delivery network (CDN) services , 2004, 37th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2004. Proceedings of the.

[15]  Qian Wang,et al.  On the Viability of Paris Metro Pricing for Communication and Service Networks , 2010, 2010 Proceedings IEEE INFOCOM.

[16]  D. Clark,et al.  Interconnection in the Internet: The Policy Challenge , 2011 .

[17]  Rajkumar Buyya,et al.  A Taxonomy of CDNs , 2008 .