Updated Statuses: Understanding Facebook Use through Explicit and Implicit Measures of Attitudes and Motivations

The overall purpose of these studies was to explore whether underlying motivations could predict frequency of Facebook use, use of social connection features and use of selfexpression features. We sought to explain both general and specific uses of Facebook by accounting for the influences of motivations, attitudes and motivation activation systems. In addition to established scales on attitude and motivation, we employed the Mini-MAM scale which is a new tool intended to index two separate motivational systems that exist in each human. In brief, those who have higher appetitive scores are more likely to seek novel stimuli while those who have higher in defensive scores tend to avoid novel stimuli. Study one showed that our adopted measure of attitudes only predicted Facebook use in general while motivations only predicted specific uses of Facebook. In contrast, we found that the MiniMAM-scale predicted most of our dependent variables, pointing out surprising and interesting relationships. Study two was run in an effort to add support and validation to study one.

[1]  C. Erik Timmerman,et al.  Relating Computer, Communication, and Computer-Mediated Communication Apprehensions to New Communication Technology Use in the Workplace , 2005, Commun. Res..

[2]  Annie Lang,et al.  Sensation Seeking, Motivation, and Substance Use: A Dual System Approach , 2005 .

[3]  Annie Lang Using the Limited Capacity Model of Motivated Mediated Message Processing to Design Effective Cancer Communication Messages , 2006 .

[4]  J. Bonds-Raacke,et al.  MySpace and Facebook: Identifying dimensions of uses and gratifications for friend networking sites. , 2010 .

[5]  Annie Lang,et al.  MiniMAM: Validating a Short Version of the Motivation Activation Measure , 2011 .

[6]  Andy P. Field,et al.  Discovering Statistics Using SPSS , 2000 .

[7]  Jason Martin,et al.  Identity construction on Facebook: Digital empowerment in anchored relationships , 2008, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[8]  Cliff Lampe,et al.  The Benefits of Facebook "Friends: " Social Capital and College Students' Use of Online Social Network Sites , 2007, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[9]  Jocelyn M. DeGroot,et al.  Attitudes Toward Online Social Connection and Self-Disclosure as Predictors of Facebook Communication and Relational Closeness , 2011, Commun. Res..

[10]  R. Putnam Tuning In, Tuning Out: The Strange Disappearance of Social Capital in America , 1995, PS: Political Science & Politics.

[11]  Andrew M. Ledbetter Measuring Online Communication Attitude: Instrument Development and Validation , 2009 .

[12]  Robert F. Potter,et al.  Correlating a Motivation-Activation Measure With Media Preference , 2011 .

[13]  Mike Thelwall,et al.  No place for news in social network web sites? , 2008, Online Inf. Rev..

[14]  Anabel Quan-Haase,et al.  Uses and Gratifications of Social Media: A Comparison of Facebook and Instant Messaging , 2010 .

[15]  Katherine Karl,et al.  Examining Students’ Intended Image on Facebook: “What Were They Thinking?!” , 2009 .

[16]  Paul M. Haridakis,et al.  The Role of Internet User Characteristics and Motives in Explaining Three Dimensions of Internet Addiction , 2009, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[17]  Bernhard Debatin,et al.  Facebook and Online Privacy: Attitudes, Behaviors, and Unintended Consequences , 2009, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[18]  Nicole B. Ellison,et al.  Self-Presentation in Online Personals , 2006, Commun. Res..

[19]  John Raacke,et al.  MySpace and Facebook: Applying the Uses and Gratifications Theory to Exploring Friend-Networking Sites , 2008, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[20]  B. Hogan The Presentation of Self in the Age of Social Media: Distinguishing Performances and Exhibitions Online , 2010 .

[21]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  The affect system has parallel and integrative processing components: Form follows function. , 1999 .

[22]  M. Bradley,et al.  The International Affective Picture System (IAPS) in the study of emotion and attention. , 2007 .

[23]  Kerk F. Kee,et al.  Being Immersed in Social Networking Environment: Facebook Groups, Uses and Gratifications, and Social Outcomes , 2009, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[24]  Annie Lang,et al.  The Motivation Activation Measure (MAM): How Well Does MAM Predict Individual Differences in Physiological Indicators of Appetitive and Aversive Activation? , 2007 .

[25]  E. Katz,et al.  The Uses of Mass Communications: Current Perspectives on Gratifications Research. Sage Annual Reviews of Communication Research Volume III. , 1975 .

[26]  Rhodes Cook Political Science and Practical Politics: A Journalist's Journey , 2010 .

[27]  Gina Masullo Chen,et al.  Tweet this: A uses and gratifications perspective on how active Twitter use gratifies a need to connect with others , 2011, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[28]  Sei-Hill Kim Media Use, Social Capital, and Civic Participation in South Korea , 2007 .