Model-Free Online Neuroadaptive Controller With Intent Estimation for Physical Human–Robot Interaction

With the rise of collaborative robots, the need for safe, reliable, and efficient physical human–robot interaction (pHRI) has grown. High-performance pHRI requires robust and stable controllers suitable for multiple degrees of freedom (DoF) and highly nonlinear robots. In this article, we describe a cascade-loop pHRI controller, which relies on human force and pose measurements and can adapt to varying robot dynamics online. It can also adapt to different users and simplifies the interaction by making the robot behave according to a prescribed dynamic model. In our controller formulation, two neural networks (NNs) in the “outer-loop” predict human motion intent and estimate a reference trajectory for the robot that the “inner-loop” controller follows. The inner-loop imposes a prescribed error dynamics (PED) with the help of a model-free neuroadaptive controller (NAC), which uses a NN to feedback linearize the robot dynamics. Lyapunov stability analysis gives weight tuning laws that guarantee that the error signals are bounded and the desired reference trajectory is achieved. Our control scheme was implemented on a Personal Robot 2 robot and validated through an exploratory experimental study in point-to-point collaborative motion. Results indicate fast convergence of our controller, and the resulting tracking error, motion jerk, and human control effort are comparable with other methods that require prior training, knowledge, and calibration.

[1]  Mehrdad H. Zadeh,et al.  Model-Based Haptic Guidance in Surgical Skill Improvement , 2015, 2015 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[2]  Katsuhisa Furuta,et al.  Adaptive impedance control to enhance human skill on a haptic interface system , 2012 .

[3]  Abderrahmane Kheddar,et al.  Motion learning and adaptive impedance for robot control during physical interaction with humans , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[4]  Morgan Quigley,et al.  ROS: an open-source Robot Operating System , 2009, ICRA 2009.

[5]  Ezra S. Krendel,et al.  Mathematical Models of Human Pilot Behavior , 1974 .

[6]  Antonio Bicchi,et al.  An atlas of physical human-robot interaction , 2008 .

[7]  Rieko Osu,et al.  CNS Learns Stable, Accurate, and Efficient Movements Using a Simple Algorithm , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[8]  Ilana Segall,et al.  Identification of a modified optimal control model for the human operator , 1976, Autom..

[9]  Shuzhi Sam Ge,et al.  Impedance Learning for Robots Interacting With Unknown Environments , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology.

[10]  Jeha Ryu,et al.  Safe physical human robot interaction-past, present and future , 2008 .

[11]  Mustafa Suphi Erden,et al.  Assisting manual welding with robot , 2011 .

[12]  Frank L. Lewis,et al.  Robot Manipulator Control: Theory and Practice , 2003 .

[13]  Frank L. Lewis,et al.  Adaptive Admittance Control for Human–Robot Interaction Using Model Reference Design and Adaptive Inverse Filtering , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology.

[14]  Frank L. Lewis,et al.  Neuroadaptive control for safe robots in human environments: A case study , 2015, 2015 IEEE International Conference on Automation Science and Engineering (CASE).

[15]  Oussama Khatib,et al.  Design and Control of a Bio-inspired Human-friendly Robot , 2010, ISER.

[16]  Dagmar Sternad,et al.  Sensitivity of Smoothness Measures to Movement Duration, Amplitude, and Arrests , 2009, Journal of motor behavior.

[17]  Jianming Lu,et al.  Adaptive Control for Nonlinear Systems Using Neural Networks , 1999 .

[18]  André Crosnier,et al.  Collaborative manufacturing with physical human–robot interaction , 2016 .

[19]  Dana Kulic,et al.  Dynamically consistent inverse kinematics framework using optimizations for human motion analysis , 2016, 2016 IEEE-RAS 16th International Conference on Humanoid Robots (Humanoids).

[20]  Gong Chen,et al.  Human–Robot Interaction Control of Rehabilitation Robots With Series Elastic Actuators , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Robotics.

[21]  Frank L. Lewis,et al.  Neural net robot controller with guaranteed tracking performance , 1995, IEEE Trans. Neural Networks.

[22]  Martin Buss,et al.  An HMM approach to realistic haptic human-robot interaction , 2009, World Haptics 2009 - Third Joint EuroHaptics conference and Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems.

[23]  Frank L. Lewis,et al.  Intent aware adaptive admittance control for physical Human-Robot Interaction , 2015, 2015 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA).

[24]  Brett Browning,et al.  A survey of robot learning from demonstration , 2009, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[25]  Shuzhi Sam Ge,et al.  Adaptive Neural Network Control of Robotic Manipulators , 1999, World Scientific Series in Robotics and Intelligent Systems.

[26]  Sandra Hirche,et al.  Impedance-based Gaussian Processes for predicting human behavior during physical interaction , 2016, 2016 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA).

[27]  Shuzhi Sam Ge,et al.  Learning impedance control for physical robot–environment interaction , 2012, Int. J. Control.

[28]  Aude Billard,et al.  A survey of Tactile Human-Robot Interactions , 2010, Robotics Auton. Syst..