Assessment of stenosis severity

Visual interpretations of coronary arteriograms are marked by such great interobserver and intraobserver variability that comparison of arteriograms from different subjects, or at different times in the same subject, are of limited value for assessing severity, changes in severity or functional significance of coronary artery stenosis. The universal use of percent diameter narrowing as a clinical measure of severity ignores other geometric characteristics of stenoses such as length, absolute diameter, multiple lesions in series or eccentric narrowings which may be worse in one view as compared to another view. Accordingly, we have developed an approach for analyzing coronary artery stenoses in both anatomic and functional terms. In this chapter an overview of the functional and anatomic approaches for quantifying severity of coronary artery stenoses is presented, their validation and equivalence outlined and the remaining problems to be solved indicated.

[1]  R. Mates,et al.  Fluid Dynamics of Coronary Artery Stenosis , 1978, Circulation research.

[2]  K. Lipscomb,et al.  Effect of stenotic dimensions and blood flow on the hemodynamic significance of model coronary arterial stenoses. , 1978, The American journal of cardiology.

[3]  W. Santamore,et al.  Altered coronary flow responses to vasoactive drugs in the presence of coronary arterial stenosis in the dog. , 1980, The American journal of cardiology.

[4]  E. Hoffman,et al.  Noninvasive assessment of coronary stenoses by myocardial imaging during pharmacologic coronary vasodilation. VI. Detection of coronary artery disease in human beings with intravenous N-13 ammonia and positron computed tomography. , 1982, The American journal of cardiology.

[5]  E. Bolson,et al.  Quantitative Coronary Arteriography: Estimation of Dimensions, Hemodynamic Resistance, and Atheroma Mass of Coronary Artery Lesions Using the Arteriogram and Digital Computation , 1977, Circulation.

[6]  Richard Hedges,et al.  ROENTGENOGRAPHIC AND DIRECT VISUALIZATION OF THORACIC DUCT. , 1964, Archives of surgery.

[7]  D. F. Young,et al.  Effect of geometry on pressure losses across models of arterial stenoses. , 1976, Journal of biomechanics.

[8]  K. Gould,et al.  Dynamic coronary stenosis. , 1980, The American journal of cardiology.

[9]  W. Nichols,et al.  Hemodynamic significance of the length of a coronary arterial narrowing. , 1978, The American journal of cardiology.

[10]  K. Gould,et al.  Assessment of coronary stenoses with myocardial perfusion imaging during pharmacologic coronary vasodilatation. IV. Limits of detection of stenosis with idealized experimental cross-sectional myocardial imaging. , 1978, The American journal of cardiology.

[11]  K. Lipscomb,et al.  Mechanism of the effect of coronary artery stenosis on coronary flow in the dog. , 1975, American heart journal.

[12]  R. M. Nerem,et al.  An Experimental Study of the Fluid Dynamics of Multiple Noncritical Stenoses , 1977 .

[13]  A. Roth Effect of collateral and peripheral resistance on blood flow through arterial stenoses. , 1976, Journal of biomechanics.

[14]  H. Gewirtz,et al.  Quantitative assessment of the effects of a fixed 50% coronary artery stenosis on regional myocardial flow reserve and transmural distribution of blood flow. , 1983, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[15]  N. Mullani,et al.  Image improvement and design optimization of the time-of-flight PET. , 1983, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[16]  M. Marcus,et al.  Measurements of Coronary Velocity and Reactive Hyperemia in the Coronary Circulation of Humans , 1981, Circulation research.

[17]  E L Bolson,et al.  Arteriographic assessment of coronary atherosclerosis. Review of current methods, their limitations, and clinical applications. , 1982, Arteriosclerosis.

[18]  R. Bache,et al.  Effect of Perfusion Pressure Distal to a Coronary Stenosis on Transmural Myocardial Blood Flow , 1982, Circulation.

[19]  K. Gallagher,et al.  Comparison of coronary arteriograms with direct measurements of stenosed coronary arteries in dogs. , 1978, American heart journal.

[20]  R. Westcott,et al.  Noninvasive assessment of coronary stenoses by myocardial imaging during pharmacologic coronary vasodilatation. II. Clinical methodology and feasibility. , 1978, The American journal of cardiology.

[21]  H A O'Brien,et al.  EVALUATION AND APPLICATION OF ALUMINA‐BASED RB‐82 GENERATORS CHARGED WITH HIGH LEVELS OF SR‐82/85 , 1979, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[22]  R. V. Fiddian,et al.  FACTORS AFFECTING FLOW THROUGH A STENOSED VESSEL. , 1964, Archives of surgery.

[23]  N R Cholvin,et al.  Hemodynamics of arterial stenoses at elevated flow rates. , 1977, Circulation research.

[24]  E. A. Philippe,et al.  Real-Time Image Reconstruction for Time-of-Flight Positron Emission Tomography (TOFPET) , 1982, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[25]  D. Skinner,et al.  Hemodynamic characteristics of critical stenosis in canine coronary arteries. , 1975, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[26]  K. Gould,et al.  Physiological Significance of Coronary Flow Velocity and Changing Stenosis Geometry during Coronary Vasodilation in Awake Dogs , 1982, Circulation research.

[27]  E. Bolson,et al.  Intravenous dipyridamole combined with isometric handgrip for near maximal acute increase in coronary flow in patients with coronary artery disease. , 1981, The American journal of cardiology.

[28]  E. Hoffman,et al.  Noninvasive assessment of coronary stenoses with myocardial perfusion imaging during pharmacologic coronary vasodilatation. V. Detection of 47 percent diameter coronary stenosis with intravenous nitrogen-13 ammonia and emission-computed tomography in intact dogs. , 1978, The American journal of cardiology.

[29]  J. Cohn,et al.  Effect of dilation of the distal coronary bed on flow and resistance in severely stenotic coronary arteries in the dog. , 1979, The American journal of cardiology.

[30]  H J ten Katen,et al.  Assessment of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty by quantitative coronary angiography: diameter versus densitometric area measurements. , 1984, The American journal of cardiology.

[31]  N R Cholvin,et al.  Pressure Drop across Artificially Induced Stenoses in the Femoral Arteries of Dogs , 1975, Circulation research.

[32]  A. Mark,et al.  Comparison of three methods of evaluating coronary obstructive lesions: postmortem arteriography, pathologic examination and measurement of regional myocardium perfusion during maximal vasodilation. , 1982, The American journal of cardiology.

[33]  W. Hillis,et al.  Reactive hyperemia: an index of the significance of coronary stenoses. , 1976, American heart journal.

[34]  N. Mullani,et al.  Sensitivity Improvement of TOFPET by the Utilization of the Inter-Slice Coincidences , 1982, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[35]  K. Gould,et al.  Pressure‐Flow Characteristics of Coronary Stenoses in Unsedated Dogs at Rest and during Coronary Vasodilation , 1978, Circulation research.

[36]  R. K. Hartz,et al.  Dynamic Imaging with High Resolution Time-of-Flight PET Camera - TOFPET I , 1984, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[37]  C M Grondin,et al.  Discrepancies Between Cineangiographic and Postmortem Findings in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease and Recent Myocardial Revascularization , 1974, Circulation.

[38]  K. Gould,et al.  Noninvasive assessment of coronary stenoses by myocardial perfusion imaging during pharmacologic coronary vasodilatation. I. Physiologic basis and experimental validation. , 1978, The American journal of cardiology.

[39]  J E Edwards,et al.  Correlation of the Antemortem Coronary Arteriogram and the Postmortem Specimen , 1973, Circulation.

[40]  J. Ritchie,et al.  Noninvasive assessment of coronary stenoses by myocardial imaging during pharmacologic coronary vasodilatation. III. Clinical trial. , 1978, The American journal of cardiology.

[41]  S. Paulin,et al.  Computerized image analysis for quantitative measurement of vessel diameter from cineangiograms. , 1983, Circulation.

[42]  T Sandor,et al.  The minimum error in estimating coronary luminal cross-sectional area from cineangiographic diameter measurements. , 1983, Catheterization and cardiovascular diagnosis.

[43]  K. Lipscomb,et al.  Compensatory changes of the distal coronary vascular bed during progressive coronary constriction. , 1975, Circulation.

[44]  C. White,et al.  The value of lesion cross-sectional area determined by quantitative coronary angiography in assessing the physiologic significance of proximal left anterior descending coronary arterial stenoses. , 1984, Circulation.

[45]  K. Gould,et al.  AUTOMATED EVALUATION OF VESSEL DIAMETER FROM ARTERIOGRAMS. , 1983 .

[46]  H A O'Brien,et al.  Myocardial perfusion with rubidium-82. I. Measurement of extraction fraction and flow with external detectors. , 1983, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[47]  K. Lipscomb,et al.  Instantaneous Flow Response and Regional Distribution During Coronary Hyperemia as Measures of Coronary Flow Reserve , 1974 .

[48]  Nizar A. Mullani,et al.  System Design of Fast Pet Scanners Utilizing Time-of-Flight , 1981, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[49]  S. E. Logan,et al.  On the Fluid Mechanics of Human Coronary Artery Stenosis , 1975, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[50]  K. Gallagher,et al.  Hemodynamic effects of controlled degrees of coronary artery stenosis in short-term and long-term studies in dogs. , 1977, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[51]  J. J. Gerbrands,et al.  Assessment of short-, medium-, and long-term variations in arterial dimensions from computer-assisted quantitation of coronary cineangiograms. , 1985, Circulation.

[52]  N. Mullani,et al.  Myocardial perfusion with rubidium-82. II. Effects of metabolic and pharmacologic interventions. , 1983, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[53]  D. F. Young,et al.  Flow characteristics in models of arterial stenoses. II. Unsteady flow. , 1973, Journal of biomechanics.

[54]  N. Mullani Myocardial perfusion with rubidium-82: III. Theory relating severity of coronary stenosis to perfusion deficit. , 1984, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[55]  K. Gould,et al.  Techniques for arteriography and hydraulic analysis of coronary stenoses in unsedated dogs. , 1978, The American journal of physiology.

[56]  J. Hoffman Maximal coronary flow and the concept of coronary vascular reserve. , 1984, Circulation.

[57]  E. Bolson,et al.  Quantitative Coronary Angiography: Measurement of the "Critical" Stenosis in Patients with Unstable Angina and Single-Vessel Disease Without Collaterals , 1979, Circulation.

[58]  E. Bolson,et al.  The Mechanisms of Nitroglycerin Action: Stenosis Vasodilatation as a Major Component of the Drug Response , 1981, Circulation.

[59]  E. Bolson,et al.  Reflex constriction of significant coronary stenosis as a mechanism contributing to ischemic left ventricular dysfunction during isometric exercise. , 1984, Circulation.

[60]  P D Esser,et al.  Quantification of relative coronary arterial stenosis by cinevideodensitometric analysis of coronary arteriograms. , 1984, Circulation.

[61]  K. Lipscomb,et al.  Effects of coronary stenoses on coronary flow reserve and resistance. , 1974, The American journal of cardiology.

[62]  Wai-Hoi Wong,et al.  Characteristics of Small Barium Fluoride (BaF2) Scintillator for High Intrinsic Resolution Time-of-Flight Positron Emission Tomography , 1984, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[63]  G W Hamilton,et al.  Physiologic basis for assessing critical coronary stenosis. Instantaneous flow response and regional distribution during coronary hyperemia as measures of coronary flow reserve. , 1974, The American journal of cardiology.

[64]  C. Zarins,et al.  Subcritical arterial stenosis enhances distal atherosclerosis , 1981 .

[65]  E S Beckenbach,et al.  Computer densitometry for angiographic assessment of arterial cholesterol content and gross pathology in human atherosclerosis. , 1977, The Journal of laboratory and clinical medicine.

[66]  N. Mullani,et al.  First-pass measurements of regional blood flow with external detectors. , 1983, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[67]  W. Santamore,et al.  Dynamic changes in the haemodynamic severity of coronary artery stenosis in a canine model. , 1979, Cardiovascular research.

[68]  K. Gould Editorial note Collapsing coronary stenosis — a Starling resistor , 1982 .

[69]  C. White,et al.  Does visual interpretation of the coronary arteriogram predict the physiologic importance of a coronary stenosis? , 1984, The New England journal of medicine.

[70]  R. Helfant,et al.  The Relationship between Myocardial Blood Flow and Contraction by Myocardial Layer in the Canine Left Ventricle during Ischemia , 1981, Circulation research.

[71]  G. Hutchins,et al.  Correlation of Coronary Arteriograms and Left Ventriculograms with Postmortem Studies , 1977, Circulation.

[72]  E L Bolson,et al.  Experimental Validation of Quantitative Coronary Arteriography for Determining Pressure-Flow Characteristics of Coronary Stenosis , 1982, Circulation.