Ranking the Micro Level Critical Factors of Electronic Medical Records Adoption Using Topsis Method

In many countries, the health care sector is entering into a time of unprecedented change. Electronic Medical Record (EMR) has been introduced into healthcare organizations in order to incorporate better use of technology, to aid decision making, and to facilitate the search for medical solution. This needs those professionals in healthcare organizations to be in the process of changing from the use of paper to maintain medical records into computerized medical recordkeeping opportunities. However, the adoption of these electronic medical records systems has been slow throughout the healthcare field. The critical users are physicians which play an important role to success of health information technology including Electronic Medical Record systems. As a result user adoption is necessary in order to understand the benefits of an EMR. Therefore, in the current paper, a model of ranking factors of micro-level in EMRs adoption was developed. Surveys distributed to physicians as this study’s respondent in two private hospitals in Malaysia. The findings indicate that physicians have a high perception means for the technology and showed that EMR would increase physician’s performance regarding to decision making. They have been and continue to be positively motivated to adopt and use the system. The relevant factors according to micro-level perspective prioritized and ranked by using the Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS). The aim of ranking and using this approach is to investigate which factors are more important in EMRs adoption from the micro-level perspectives. The results of performing TOPSIS is as a novelty which assist health information systems (HIS) success and also healthcare organizations to motivate their users in accepting of new technology.

[1]  Gert P Westert,et al.  Do decision support systems influence variation in prescription? , 2009, BMC health services research.

[2]  Nick Booth,et al.  Identification of high-quality consultation practice in primary care: the effects of computer use on doctor-patient rapport. , 2004, Informatics in primary care.

[3]  Ida Sim,et al.  Electronic Medical Records in Solo/Small Groups: A Qualitative Study of Physician User Types , 2004, MedInfo.

[4]  Päivi Rautava,et al.  The quality of electronic patient records in Finnish primary healthcare needs to be improved , 2008, Scandinavian journal of primary health care.

[5]  J. Hanley,et al.  The medical office of the 21st century (MOXXI): effectiveness of computerized decision-making support in reducing inappropriate prescribing in primary care. , 2003, CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne.

[6]  Ching-Lai Hwang,et al.  Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications - A State-of-the-Art Survey , 1981, Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems.

[7]  Ephraim R. McLean,et al.  Information Systems Success: The Quest for the Dependent Variable , 1992, Inf. Syst. Res..

[8]  Simon Barraclough,et al.  Health care in Malaysia : the dynamics of provision, financing and access , 2007 .

[9]  John Doucette,et al.  Primary Care Physicians' Experience with Electronic Medical Records: Barriers to Implementation in a Fee-for-Service Environment , 2008, International journal of telemedicine and applications.

[10]  R. Baron,et al.  Quality Improvement with an Electronic Health Record: Achievable, but Not Automatic , 2007, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[11]  Morgan Price,et al.  Impact of electronic medical record on physician practice in office settings: a systematic review , 2012, BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making.

[12]  Karim Keshavjee,et al.  Measuring the success of electronic medical record implementation using electronic and survey data , 2001, AMIA.

[13]  J. Hippisley-Cox,et al.  The electronic patient record in primary care—regression or progression? A cross sectional study , 2003, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[14]  Christian G Downs Electronic medical records mark a landmark shift in record keeping. , 2006, ONS news.

[15]  Emily Beth Devine,et al.  Technology Evaluation: The Impact of e-Prescribing on Prescriber and Staff Time in Ambulatory Care Clinics: A Time-Motion Study , 2007, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[16]  Mehrbakhsh Nilashi,et al.  Ranking Parameters on Quality of Online Shopping Websites Using Multi-Criteria Method , 2012 .

[17]  Simon de Lusignan,et al.  Viewpoint Paper: e-Prescribing, Efficiency, Quality: Lessons from the Computerization of UK Family Practice , 2006, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[18]  D. Roter,et al.  Electronic medical record use and physician-patient communication: an observational study of Israeli primary care encounters. , 2006, Patient education and counseling.

[19]  Pradeep Kumar Ray,et al.  Electronic Medical Records: A Review Comparing the Challenges in Developed and Developing Countries , 2008, Proceedings of the 41st Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS 2008).

[20]  Robyn Tamblyn,et al.  A randomized trial of the effectiveness of on-demand versus computer-triggered drug decision support in primary care. , 2008, Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA.

[21]  Sarah Muttitt,et al.  A proposed benefits evaluation framework for health information systems in Canada. , 2007, Healthcare quarterly.

[22]  V. Bufalino,et al.  Effectiveness of the electronic medical record in cholesterol management in patients with coronary artery disease (Virtual Lipid Clinic). , 2001, The American journal of cardiology.

[23]  D. Bates,et al.  Electronic health record use and the quality of ambulatory care in the United States. , 2007, Archives of internal medicine.

[24]  Oliver Frank,et al.  Opportunistic electronic reminders. Improving performance of preventive care in general practice. , 2004, Australian family physician.

[25]  Mehrbakhsh Nilashi,et al.  A multi-criteria approach to the evaluation of Malaysian government portal , 2012 .

[26]  Paul A. de Clercq,et al.  The effect of computer reminders on GPs' prescribing behaviour: A cluster-randomised trial , 2007, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[27]  Benita M. Cox,et al.  The impact of electronic patient records on workflow in general practice , 2007, Health Informatics J..

[28]  Anders Grimsmo,et al.  Expectations for the next generation of electronic patient records in primary care: a triangulated study. , 2008, Informatics in primary care.

[29]  F W Lee,et al.  Impact of an Electronic Medical Record System on Community-Based Primary Care Practices , 2000, The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine.

[30]  David A Newby,et al.  Effect of computerised prescribing on use of antibiotics , 2003, The Medical journal of Australia.

[31]  Ebrahim Randeree,et al.  Exploring Physician Adoption of EMRs: A Multi-Case Analysis , 2007, Journal of Medical Systems.

[32]  Rod Jackson,et al.  Integrated electronic decision support increases cardiovascular disease risk assessment four fold in routine primary care practice , 2008, European journal of cardiovascular prevention and rehabilitation : official journal of the European Society of Cardiology, Working Groups on Epidemiology & Prevention and Cardiac Rehabilitation and Exercise Physiology.

[33]  Peter Schattner,et al.  Using computer based templates for chronic disease management. , 2008, Australian family physician.

[34]  T. Peters,et al.  The quality of record keeping in primary care: a comparison of computerised, paper and hybrid systems. , 2003, The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners.

[35]  Anske Robinson Information technology creeps into rural general practice. , 2003, Australian health review : a publication of the Australian Hospital Association.

[36]  Frank Sullivan,et al.  Consultation computer use to improve management of chronic disease in general practice: a before and after study. , 2003, Informatics in primary care.

[37]  Karim Keshavjee,et al.  From benefits evaluation to clinical adoption: making sense of health information system success in Canada. , 2011, Healthcare quarterly.

[38]  Jessica Dennison,et al.  An effective electronic surgical referral system. , 2006, Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England.

[39]  Tom Fahey,et al.  Evaluation of computer based clinical decision support system and risk chart for management of hypertension in primary care: randomised controlled trial , 2000, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[40]  Christopher E. West,et al.  The value of electronic health records in solo or small group practices. , 2005, Health affairs.