This article argues that the life-works of Norbert Elias and Franz Borkenau can best be understood together, as they were developed in close interaction during the 1930s. Deriving inspiration from Freud, they took up the project formulated by Weber at the end of his `Anticritical Last Word'. However, in two significant respects they went beyond the Weberian problematics. First, overcoming the centrality attributed to economic concerns, they rooted the Western civilizing process in the long-term attempt to harness the violence that was escalated by the emergence and then collapse of the Roman Empire. Second, they emphasized the crucial importance of periods of transition that follow an overall dissolution of order and mark the possible future course of events.
[1]
Valeria E. Russo.
Henryk Grossmann and Franz Borkenau A Bio-Bibliography
,
1987,
Science in Context.
[2]
Stefan Breuer.
Society of individuals, society of organizations: a comparison of Norbert Elias and Max Weber
,
1994
.
[3]
W. M. Davis.
"Anticritical Last Word on The Spirit of Capitalism," by Max Weber
,
1978,
American Journal of Sociology.
[4]
Theory of science and history of science
,
1972
.
[5]
Dennis Smith.
The Civilizing Process and The History of Sexuality: Comparing Norbert Elias and Michel Foucault
,
1999
.
[6]
R. V. Krieken,et al.
The organization of the soul : Elias and Foucault on discipline and the self
,
1990,
European Journal of Sociology.