Strategic positioning of inventory review policies in alternative supply chain networks: an information-sharing paradigm perspective

One of the key issues in the current research on supply chain (SC) networks is the need for planning the nature of the inventory policy at each echelon of the SC network structure. Given the inherent uncertainties pervading the operational environment within real-world SC networks, it becomes imperative therefore, for each partnering echelon to focus on its individual inventory review policy from the viewpoint of global optimisation of the overall SC performance. Two key factors contributing to the aforementioned uncertainty are the lead time and their standard deviations, and the extant literature has often advocated the adoption of demand information-sharing between the partnering echelons to mitigate the deleterious impact of these factors on system performance. In this paper, we explicitly focus attention on these factors through their manifestation within two different hypothetical SC networks, and study their impact on the average fill rate performance of the assumed systems with and without demand information-sharing. Towards this end, we develop discrete event simulation models of the hypothetical SC structures and exploit the Taguchi experimental design procedure as a vehicle for conducting the simulation experiments and analysing its outcome. While simulation results highlight the impact of the assumed factors on system-wide performance, the Taguchi paradigm further helps identify appropriate combinations of these factors for optimal fill rate performance. Key results reveal that sharing of demand information between partnering echelons should not automatically be taken for granted as a direction for performance enhancement.

[1]  Jairo R. Montoya-Torres,et al.  Measuring the Impact of Supplier-Customer Information Sharing on Production Scheduling , 2009, Int. J. Inf. Syst. Supply Chain Manag..

[2]  Jan Olhager,et al.  Simulating production and inventory control systems: a learning approach to operational excellence , 2006 .

[3]  Lazaros G. Papageorgiou,et al.  A combined optimization and agent-based approach to supply chain modelling and performance assessment , 2001 .

[4]  J. Forrester Industrial Dynamics , 1997 .

[5]  G. Reiner,et al.  Customized supply chain design: Problems and alternatives for a production company in the food industry. A simulation based analysis , 2004 .

[6]  Min Huang,et al.  Simulation study using system dynamics for a CONWIP-controlled lamp supply chain , 2007 .

[7]  S. Umeda,et al.  Supply chain simulation: generic models and application examples , 2006 .

[8]  Madhan Shridhar Phadke,et al.  Quality Engineering Using Robust Design , 1989 .

[9]  Chu‐Hua Kuei,et al.  Designing and Managing the Supply Chain Concepts, Strategies, and Case Studies , 2000 .

[10]  Victoria C. P. Chen,et al.  Performance analysis of conjoined supply chains , 2001 .

[11]  Kyung-Sup Kim,et al.  A simulation approach for production-distribution planning with consideration given to replenishment policies , 2006 .

[12]  Mark S. Fox,et al.  Agent-Oriented Supply-Chain Management , 2000 .

[13]  T. R. Bement,et al.  Taguchi techniques for quality engineering , 1995 .

[14]  Henry Aigbedo,et al.  Analysis of parts requirements variance for a JIT supply chain , 2004 .

[15]  Cheng Zhang,et al.  Design and simulation of demand information sharing in a supply chain , 2007, Simul. Model. Pract. Theory.

[16]  J. W. Patterson,et al.  Comparison of push and pull control strategies for supply network management in a make-to-stock environment , 2004 .

[17]  Michael J. Shaw,et al.  Information infrastructure for electronic virtual organization management , 1998, Decis. Support Syst..

[18]  Chandrasekharan Rajendran,et al.  A Simulation Study of Dynamic Order-up-to Policies in a Supply Chain with Non-Stationary Customer Demand and Information Sharing , 2005 .

[19]  Xue Zhong Wang,et al.  A multi-agent system for chemical supply chain simulation and management support , 2002, OR Spectr..

[20]  Benita M. Beamon,et al.  A hybrid push/pull control algorithm for multi-stage, multi-line production systems , 2000 .

[21]  Werner Jammernegg,et al.  Performance improvement of supply chain processes by coordinated inventory and capacity management , 2007 .

[22]  Gad Rabinowitz,et al.  Sensitivity of 'Push' and 'Pull' strategies to information updating rate , 2003 .

[23]  Vineet Padmanabhan,et al.  Comments on "Information Distortion in a Supply Chain: The Bullwhip Effect" , 1997, Manag. Sci..

[24]  T. F. Burgess,et al.  Modelling a complex supply chain: understanding the effect of simplified assumptions , 2005 .

[25]  Wenjiao Zhao,et al.  Coordination of joint pricing-production decisions in a supply chain , 2002 .

[26]  Sanjay L. Ahire,et al.  A model for a Mixed Continuous-Periodic Review One-Warehouse, N-Retailer inventory system , 1996 .

[27]  Shanling Li,et al.  Operational design of a supply chain system using the Taguchi method, response surface methodology, simulation, and optimization , 2004 .

[28]  S.-T. Yee Impact analysis of customized demand information sharing on supply chain performance , 2005 .

[29]  Matloub Hussain,et al.  Exploring the bullwhip effect using simulation and Taguchi experimental design , 2012 .

[30]  D. Simchi-Levi Designing And Managing The Supply Chain , 2007 .

[31]  M. Shaw,et al.  A strategic analysis of inter organizational information sharing , 2006, Decis. Support Syst..

[32]  Hau L. Lee,et al.  Information distortion in a supply chain: the bullwhip effect , 1997 .

[33]  Simone Zanoni,et al.  Cost performance and bullwhip effect in a hybrid manufacturing and remanufacturing system with different control policies , 2006 .

[34]  J. Venkateswaran,et al.  Impact of modelling approximations in supply chain analysis – an experimental study , 2004 .

[35]  Randall P. Sadowski,et al.  Simulation with Arena , 1998 .

[36]  George Q. Huang,et al.  Impact of information sharing on inventory replenishment in divergent supply chains , 2004 .