Benefits of Six Degrees of Freedom for Optically Driven Patient Set-up Correction in SBRT

To quantify the advantages of a 6 degrees of freedom (dof) versus the conventional 3- or 4-dof correction modality for stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) treatments. Eighty-five patients were fitted with 5–7 infra-red passive markers for optical localization. Data, acquired during the treatment, were analyzed retrospectively to simulate and evaluate the best approach for correcting patient misalignments. After the implementation of each correction, the new position of the target (tumor's center of mass) was estimated by means of a dedicated stereotactic algorithm. The Euclidean distance between the corrected and the planned location of target point was calculated and compared to the initial mismatching. Initial and after correction median±quartile displacements affecting external control points were 3.74±2.55 mm (initial), 2.45±0.91 mm (3-dof), 2.37±0.95 mm (4-dof), and 2.03±1.47 mm (6-dof). The benefit of a six-parameter adjustment was particularly evident when evaluating the results relative to the target position before and after the re-alignment. In this context, the Euclidean distance between the planned and the current target point turned to 0.82±1.12mm (median±quartile values) after the roto-translation versus the initial displacement of 2.98±2.32mm. No statistical improvements were found after 3- and 4-dof correction (2.73±1.22 mm and 2.60±1.31 mm, respectively). Angular errors were 0.09±0.93° (mean±std). Pitch rotation in abdomen site showed the most relevant deviation, being − 0.46±1.27° with a peak value of 5.46°. Translational misalignments were −0.68±2.60 mm (mean±std) with the maximum value of 12 mm along the cranio-caudal direction. We conclude that positioning system platforms featuring 6-dof are preferred for high precision radiation therapy. Data are in line with previous results relative to other sites and represent a relevant record in the framework of SBRT.

[1]  S Tao,et al.  Patient set-up in radiotherapy with video-based positioning system. , 2006, Clinical oncology (Royal College of Radiologists (Great Britain)).

[2]  Hanne M Kooy,et al.  Target volume dose considerations in proton beam treatment planning for lung tumors. , 2005, Medical physics.

[3]  David Djajaputra,et al.  Real-time 3D surface-image-guided beam setup in radiotherapy of breast cancer. , 2004, Medical physics.

[4]  Yuzo Kikuchi,et al.  Development of computerized patient setup verification and correction system in radiotherapy. , 2005, Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai zasshi.

[5]  Mark Oldham,et al.  Cone-beam-CT guided radiation therapy: A model for on-line application. , 2005, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[6]  Joao Seco,et al.  Effects of Hounsfield number conversion on CT based proton Monte Carlo dose calculations. , 2007, Medical physics.

[7]  Hui Yan,et al.  A phantom study on the positioning accuracy of the Novalis Body system. , 2003, Medical physics.

[8]  Timothy D Solberg,et al.  Targeting accuracy of an image guided gating system for stereotactic body radiotherapy , 2005, Physics in medicine and biology.

[9]  Dirk Verellen,et al.  Clinical use of stereoscopic X-ray positioning of patients treated with conformal radiotherapy for prostate cancer. , 2002, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[10]  D. Verellen,et al.  Six dimensional analysis with daily stereoscopic x-ray imaging of intrafraction patient motion in head and neck treatments using five points fixation masks. , 2006, Medical physics.

[11]  J. Chavaudra,et al.  Prescribing, Recording, And Reporting Photon Beam Therapy Presentation Of The ICRU Report # 50 , 1992 .

[12]  Hilke Vorwerk,et al.  Interfractional and intrafractional accuracy during radiotherapy of gynecologic carcinomas: a comprehensive evaluation using the ExacTrac system. , 2003, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[13]  Cristina Garibaldi,et al.  Patient set-up verification by infrared optical localization and body surface sensing in breast radiation therapy. , 2006, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[14]  Michael Vogele,et al.  The patient positioning concept for the planned MedAustron centre. , 2004, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[15]  Cedric X. Yu,et al.  Real-time intra-fraction-motion tracking using the treatment couch: a feasibility study , 2005, Physics in medicine and biology.

[16]  T Liebler,et al.  An application framework for computer-aided patient positioning in radiation therapy , 2003, Medical informatics and the Internet in medicine.

[17]  Bruno Sorcini,et al.  Clinical application of image-guided radiotherapy, IGRT (on the Varian OBI platform). , 2006, Cancer radiotherapie : journal de la Societe francaise de radiotherapie oncologique.

[18]  Prakash Chinnaiyan,et al.  The impact of daily setup variations on head-and-neck intensity-modulated radiation therapy. , 2005, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[19]  Dirk Verellen,et al.  Quality assurance of a system for improved target localization and patient set-up that combines real-time infrared tracking and stereoscopic X-ray imaging. , 2003, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[20]  G Ferrigno,et al.  Real-time opto-electronic verification of patient position in breast cancer radiotherapy. , 2000, Computer aided surgery : official journal of the International Society for Computer Aided Surgery.

[21]  Cristina Garibaldi,et al.  Robust frameless stereotactic localization in extra-cranial radiotherapy. , 2006, Medical physics.

[22]  David D. Smith,et al.  Pitch, roll, and yaw variations in patient positioning. , 2006, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[23]  M. Herman Clinical use of electronic portal imaging. , 2005, Seminars in radiation oncology.

[24]  K L Lam,et al.  A mathematical model for correcting patient setup errors using a tilt and roll device. , 1999, Medical physics.

[25]  K L Lam,et al.  A tilt and roll device for automated correction of rotational setup errors. , 1998, Medical physics.

[26]  James M. Balter,et al.  A comparison of computer‐controlled versus manual on‐line patient setup adjustment , 2002, Journal of applied clinical medical physics.

[27]  Jay B. West,et al.  Fiducial Point Placement and the Accuracy of Point-based, Rigid Body Registration , 2001, Neurosurgery.

[28]  Christoph Bert,et al.  Clinical experience with a 3D surface patient setup system for alignment of partial-breast irradiation patients. , 2006, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[29]  John M Buatti,et al.  Optically guided patient positioning techniques. , 2005, Seminars in Radiation Oncology.