State-Space Transformations of Uncertain Systems with Purely Real and Conjugate-Complex Eigenvalues into a Cooperative Form

Cooperativity of uncertain dynamic systems can be exploited to simplify several tasks such as the computation of guaranteed state enclosures, the design of interval observers, forecasting worst-case bounds for selected system outputs in predictive control, and the identification of unknown parameters. Although many system models in biological, chemical, and medical applications are naturally cooperative, there is also a great number of systems (typically from the fields of electric, magnetic, and mechanical applications) which do not show this property if the state equations are derived using first-principle techniques. Hence, it is often desired to transform such system models into an equivalent cooperative form. Unfortunately, these transformations are often not straightforward, especially, if linear systems and nonlinear ones with state-dependent system matrices are subject to bounded parameter uncertainty. This paper presents two approaches for the transformation of state equations into a cooperative form for which the original system models do not fulfill sufficient criteria for cooperativity in their basic formulation. These are a time-invariant transformation for systems with purely real eigenvalues and a time-varying transformation in the case of conjugate-complex eigenvalues. Both procedures are tested on real-life application scenarios with interval parameters.

[1]  T. Kaczorek Positive 1D and 2D Systems , 2001 .

[2]  Theodor M. Fliedner,et al.  Modern Control Theory as a Tool to Describe the Biomathematical Model of Granulocytopoiesis , 1990, Analyse dynamischer Systeme in Medizin, Biologie und Ökologie.

[3]  Sylvie Gillot,et al.  The COST Simulation Benchmark: Description and Simulator Manual , 2001 .

[4]  Andreas Rauh,et al.  An Interval Approach for Parameter Identification and Observer Design of Spatially Distributed Heating Systems , 2018 .

[5]  E. Hofer,et al.  VALENCIA-IVP: A Comparison with Other Initial Value Problem Solvers , 2006, 12th GAMM - IMACS International Symposium on Scientific Computing, Computer Arithmetic and Validated Numerics (SCAN 2006).

[6]  N. Nedialkov,et al.  Interval Tools for ODEs and DAEs , 2006, 12th GAMM - IMACS International Symposium on Scientific Computing, Computer Arithmetic and Validated Numerics (SCAN 2006).

[7]  Siegfried M. Rump,et al.  INTLAB - INTerval LABoratory , 1998, SCAN.

[8]  C. Scherer,et al.  Linear Matrix Inequalities in Control , 2011 .

[9]  Denis V. Efimov,et al.  Interval state observer for nonlinear time varying systems , 2013, Autom..

[10]  Vicenç Puig,et al.  Worst-Case Simulation of Discrete Linear Time-Invariant Interval Dynamic Systems , 2003, Reliab. Comput..

[11]  Harald Aschemann,et al.  Active Damping and Drive Train Control for a Wind Turbine with a Hydrostatic Transmission and a PMSG , 2017 .

[12]  T. Fortmann,et al.  An Introduction to Linear Control Systems , 1977 .

[13]  Olivier Bernard,et al.  Asymptotically Stable Interval Observers for Planar Systems With Complex Poles , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[14]  Michael Malisoff,et al.  Design of continuous-discrete observers for time-varying nonlinear systems , 2015, Autom..

[15]  Hal L. Smith,et al.  Monotone Dynamical Systems: An Introduction To The Theory Of Competitive And Cooperative Systems (Mathematical Surveys And Monographs) By Hal L. Smith , 1995 .

[16]  E. R. Carson,et al.  Mathematical modelling of endocrine and metabolic systems: Model formulation, identification and validation , 1982 .

[17]  Andreas Rauh,et al.  Interval methods for the implementation and verification of robust gain scheduling controllers , 2017, 2017 22nd International Conference on Methods and Models in Automation and Robotics (MMAR).

[18]  Denis V. Efimov,et al.  Interval State Estimation for a Class of Nonlinear Systems , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.