In Study 1, undergraduates were asked to consider a scenario in which they were writing a paper and that, in the process of researching material for the paper, they had encountered a relevant paragraph from a journal article which they had to paraphrase. The students were given a two-sentence paragraph and were asked to paraphrase it to the best of their ability. Analysis indicated that between 41% and 68% of the paraphrased paragraphs were “plagiarized” to some degree, where plagiarism was defined as the appropriation of strings of 5 consecutive words or longer. In addition, 52% of the paraphrased paragraphs contained from minor to serious distortions of the original material. In a second study, another sample of undergraduates was asked to paraphrase a similar two-sentence paragraph from a textbook which was easier to read. This time between 9% and 19% of the paraphrased paragraphs evidenced similar amounts of appropriated text, although a comparable proportion of distortions (50%) occurred. The combined results suggest that plagiarism by college students may stem, in part, from their inability to process complex unfamiliar text.
[1]
R. Zenhausern.
Imagery, cerebral dominance, and style of thinking: A unified field model
,
1978
.
[2]
S. Wilhoit.
Helping Students Avoid Plagiarism
,
1994
.
[3]
A. D. Froese,et al.
Citing Secondary Sources: Can We Correct What Students Do Not Know?
,
1995
.
[4]
Doris R. Dant.
Plagiarism in High School: A Survey.
,
1986
.
[5]
Loretta N. McGregor,et al.
Academic Dishonesty: Prevalence, Determinants, Techniques, and Punishments
,
1992
.
[6]
Miguel Roig,et al.
Can undergraduate students determine whether text has been plagiarized?
,
1997
.
[7]
Mark Torrance,et al.
Finding something to write about: strategic and automatic processes in idea generation
,
1996
.
[8]
L. Treviño,et al.
Academic Dishonesty: Honor Codes and Other Contextual Influences
,
1993
.