Assessment of genetically modified maize MON 87427 × MON 89034 × MIR162 × NK603 and subcombinations, for food and feed uses, under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 (application EFSA-GMO-NL-2016-131).

Abstract Maize MON 87427 × MON 89034 × MIR162 × NK603 (four‐event stack maize) was produced by conventional crossing to combine four single events: MON 87427, MON 89034, MIR162 and NK603. The GMO Panel previously assessed the four single maize events and four of the subcombinations did not identify safety concerns. No new data on the single maize events or the four subcombinations that could lead to modification of the original conclusions on their safety were identified. The molecular characterisation, comparative analysis (agronomic, phenotypic and compositional characteristics) and the outcome of the toxicological, allergenicity and nutritional assessment indicate that the combination of the single maize events and of the newly expressed proteins in the four‐event stack maize does not give rise to food and feed safety and nutritional concerns. The GMO Panel concludes that the four‐event stack maize, as described in this application, is as safe as and nutritionally equivalent to its non‐GM comparator and the non‐GM reference varieties tested. In the case of accidental release of viable grains of the four‐event stack maize into the environment, this would not raise environmental safety concerns. The GMO Panel assessed the likelihood of interactions among the single events in the six maize subcombinations not previously assessed and concludes that these are expected to be as safe as and nutritionally equivalent to the single events, the previously assessed subcombinations and the four‐event stack maize. The post‐market environmental monitoring plan and reporting intervals are in line with the intended uses of the four‐event stack maize. Post‐market monitoring of food/feed is not considered necessary. The GMO Panel concludes that the four‐event stack maize and its subcombinations are as safe as its non‐GM comparator and the tested non‐GM reference varieties with respect to potential effects on human and animal health and the environment.

[1]  Jain,et al.  United States Patent and Trademark Office , 2020, Federal Regulatory Guide.

[2]  H. Naegeli,et al.  Assessment of genetically modified maize Bt11 × MIR162 × MIR604 × 1507 × 5307 × GA21 and subcombinations, for food and feed uses, under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 (application EFSA‐GMO‐DE‐2011‐103) , 2019, EFSA Journal.

[3]  G. Kleter,et al.  Lack of adverse effects in subchronic and chronic toxicity/carcinogenicity studies on the glyphosate-resistant genetically modified maize NK603 in Wistar Han RCC rats , 2019, Archives of Toxicology.

[4]  H. Naegeli,et al.  Assessment of genetically modified maize MON 89034 × 1507 × NK603 × DAS‐40278‐9 and subcombinations independently of their origin for food and feed uses, import and processing, under Regulation (EC) No 1829‐2003 (application EFSA‐GMO‐NL‐2013‐112) , 2019, EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority.

[5]  H. Naegeli,et al.  Assessment of genetically modified maize MON 89034 × 1507 × MON 88017 × 59122 × DAS‐40278‐9 and subcombinations independently of their origin for food and feed uses, import and processing under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 (application EFSA‐GMO‐NL‐2013‐113) , 2019, EFSA Journal.

[6]  Julie Glanville,et al.  Explanatory note on literature searching conducted in the context of GMO applications for (renewed) market authorisation and annual post‐market environmental monitoring reports on GMOs authorised in the EU market , 2017, EFSA Supporting Publications.

[7]  A. Birch,et al.  Scientific opinion on application EFSA ‐ GMO ‐ BE ‐ 2013 ‐ 118 for authorisation of genetically modified maize MON 87427 × MON 89034 × 1507 × MON , 2019 .

[8]  C. Tebbe,et al.  Explanatory note on DNA sequence similarity searches in the context of the assessment of horizontal gene transfer from plants to microorganisms , 2017 .

[9]  R. Binimelis,et al.  Teosinte in Europe – Searching for the Origin of a Novel Weed , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[10]  N. Banyuls,et al.  Insights into the Structure of the Vip3Aa Insecticidal Protein by Protease Digestion Analysis , 2017, Toxins.

[11]  K. Pascher Spread of volunteer and feral maize plants in Central Europe: recent data from Austria , 2016, Environmental Sciences Europe.

[12]  N. Banyuls,et al.  Bacterial Vegetative Insecticidal Proteins (Vip) from Entomopathogenic Bacteria , 2016, Microbiology and Molecular Reviews.

[13]  A. Chesson,et al.  Scientific Opinion on the application (EFSA-GMO-BE-2012-110) for the placing on the market of tissue-selective herbicide-tolerant genetically modified maize MON 87427 for food and feed uses, import and processing under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 from , 2015 .

[14]  J. Ward,et al.  The food and environmental safety of Bt crops , 2015, Front. Plant Sci..

[15]  A. Chesson,et al.  Guidance on the agronomic and phenotypic characterisation of genetically modified plants , 2015 .

[16]  Bruce Hammond,et al.  Toxicological evaluation of proteins introduced into food crops , 2013, Critical reviews in toxicology.

[17]  H. Kuiper,et al.  Scientific Opinion on application (EFSA-GMO-DE-2010-82) for the placingon the market of insect-resistant genetically modified maize MIR162 forfood and feed uses, import and processing under Regulation (EC)No 1829/2003 from Syngenta , 2012 .

[18]  Antoine Messéan,et al.  Guidance on the Post-Market Environmental Monitoring (PMEM) ofgenetically modified plants , 2011 .

[19]  H. Kuiper,et al.  Guidance for risk assessment of food and feed from genetically modified plants , 2011 .

[20]  H. Kuiper,et al.  Scientific Opinion on application (Reference EFSA-GMO-UK-2008-56) forthe placing on the market of insect resistant and herbicide tolerantgenetically modified maize Bt11 x MIR604 x GA21 , for food and feed uses,import and processing under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 from SyngentaSeeds , 2010 .

[21]  Gábor L. Lövei,et al.  Application of Systematic Review Methodology to Food and Feed Safety Assessments to Support Decision Making , 2010 .

[22]  Antoine Messéan,et al.  Guidance on the environmental risk assessment of genetically modified plants , 2010 .

[23]  B. Tinland,et al.  General Surveillance for Import and Processing: the EuropaBio approach , 2009, Journal für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit.

[24]  Enric Melé,et al.  Effect of volunteers on maize gene flow , 2009, Transgenic Research.

[25]  Nathalie Colbach,et al.  Post-harvest gene escape and approaches for minimizing it , 2008 .

[26]  Joachim Schiemann,et al.  Scientific Opinion of the Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms , 2008 .

[27]  B. Tinland,et al.  General Surveillance: Roles and Responsibilities The Industry View , 2007, Journal für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit.

[28]  Thirty-Second Session JOINT FAO/WHO FOOD STANDARDS PROGRAMME , 2007 .

[29]  A. Shelton,et al.  Characterization of Chimeric Bacillus thuringiensis Vip3 Toxins , 2006, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[30]  K. Narva,et al.  Novel Bacillus thuringiensis Binary Insecticidal Crystal Proteins Active on Western Corn Rootworm, Diabrotica virgifera virgifera LeConte , 2002, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[31]  Consensus Document on Compositional Considerations for New Varieties of Maize ( Zea Mays ) : Key Food and Feed Nutrients , 2002 .

[32]  Genetically modified organisms (GMOs): The significance of gene flow through pollen transfer , 2002 .

[33]  D. Negrotto,et al.  The use of phosphomannose-isomerase as a selectable marker to recover transgenic maize plants (Zea mays L.) via Agrobacterium transformation , 2000, Plant Cell Reports.

[34]  Vázquez,et al.  Bacillus thuringiensis Cry1Ac Protoxin is a Potent Systemic and Mucosal Adjuvant , 1999, Scandinavian journal of immunology.

[35]  N. Crickmore,et al.  Bacillus thuringiensis and Its Pesticidal Crystal Proteins , 1998, Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews.

[36]  M. Koziel,et al.  Vip3A, a novel Bacillus thuringiensis vegetative insecticidal protein with a wide spectrum of activities against lepidopteran insects. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[37]  K. Herrmann The Shikimate Pathway: Early Steps in the Biosynthesis of Aromatic Compounds. , 1995, The Plant cell.

[38]  R. Sydiskis,et al.  Genetic and Biochemical Studies on Mannose-Negative Mutants That Are Deficient in Phosphomannose Isomerase in Escherichia coli K-12 , 1967, Journal of bacteriology.