Cooperative DNA‐binding by Bicoid provides a mechanism for threshold‐dependent gene activation in the Drosophila embryo

The Bicoid morphogen directs pattern formation along the anterior–posterior (A–P) axis of the Drosophila embryo. Bicoid is distributed in a concentration gradient that decreases exponentially from the anterior pole, however, it transcribes target genes such as hunchback in a step‐function‐like pattern; the expression domain is uniform and has a sharply defined posterior boundary. A ‘gradient‐affinity’ model proposed to explain Bicoid action states that (i) cooperative gene activation by Bicoid generates the sharp on/off switch for target gene transcription and (ii) target genes with different affinities for Bicoid are expressed at different positions along the A–P axis. Using an in vivo yeast assay and in vitro methods, we show that Bicoid binds DNA with pairwise cooperativity; Bicoid bound to a strong site helps Bicoid bind to a weak site. These results support the first aspect of the model, providing a mechanism by which Bicoid generates sharp boundaries of gene expression. However, contrary to the second aspect of the model, we find no significant difference between the affinity of Bicoid for the anterior gene hunchback and the posterior gene knirps. We propose, instead, that the arrangement of Bicoids bound to the target gene presents a unique signature to the transcription machinery that, in combination with overall affinity, regulates the extent of gene transcription along the A–P axis.

[1]  K. Struhl,et al.  The gradient morphogen bicoid is a concentration-dependent transcriptional activator , 1989, Cell.

[2]  Roger Brent,et al.  C dil, a Human Gl and S Phase Protein Phosphatase That Associates with Cdk2 , 2003 .

[3]  Michael L. Johnson,et al.  [16] Nonlinear least-squares analysis , 1985 .

[4]  R. Tjian,et al.  DNA Template and Activator-Coactivator Requirements for Transcriptional Synergism by Drosophila Bicoid , 1995, Science.

[5]  J. Gergen,et al.  Regulation of runt transcription by Drosophila segmentation genes , 1993, Mechanisms of Development.

[6]  A. Jeffrey,et al.  How the λ repressor and cro work , 1980, Cell.

[7]  C. Cantor,et al.  Biophysical chemistry. Part III, The behavior of biologicalmacromolecules , 1980 .

[8]  C. Nüsslein-Volhard,et al.  The bicoid protein determines position in the Drosophila embryo in a concentration-dependent manner , 1988, Cell.

[9]  G. K. Ackers,et al.  Quantitative model for gene regulation by lambda phage repressor. , 1982, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[10]  C. Nüsslein-Volhard,et al.  Organization of anterior pattern in the Drosophila embryo by the maternal gene bicoid , 1986, Nature.

[11]  M. Ptashne A Genetic Switch , 1986 .

[12]  M. Levine,et al.  Regulation of a segmentation stripe by overlapping activators and repressors in the Drosophila embryo. , 1991, Science.

[13]  Gerald M Rubin,et al.  RETRACTED: TAFIIs Mediate Activation of Transcription in the Drosophila Embryo , 1996, Cell.

[14]  L. Brocchieri,et al.  Pbx modulation of Hox homeodomain amino-terminal arms establishes different DNA-binding specificities across the Hox locus , 1996, Molecular and cellular biology.

[15]  C. Nüsslein-Volhard,et al.  A gradient of bicoid protein in Drosophila embryos , 1988, Cell.

[16]  T. Kodadek,et al.  A single GAL4 dimer can maximally activate transcription under physiological conditions. , 1995, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[17]  M. Ptashne,et al.  Saccharomyces cerevisiae GAL1-GAL10 divergent promoter region: location and function of the upstream activating sequence UASG , 1984, Molecular and cellular biology.

[18]  D. Picard,et al.  Fusion of GAL4-VP16 to a steroid-binding domain provides a tool for gratuitous induction of galactose-responsive genes in yeast. , 1993, Gene.

[19]  J. W. Little,et al.  Dimerization of a specific DNA-binding protein on the DNA. , 1992, Science.

[20]  J. W. Little,et al.  Highly cooperative DNA binding by the coliphage HK022 repressor. , 1993, Journal of molecular biology.

[21]  G. K. Ackers,et al.  Single-site mutations in the C-terminal domain of bacteriophage lambda cI repressor alter cooperative interactions between dimers adjacently bound to OR. , 1994, Biochemistry.

[22]  Claude Desplan,et al.  Synergy between the hunchback and bicoid morphogens is required for anterior patterning in Drosophila , 1994, Cell.

[23]  H. Jäckle,et al.  Heterodimeric Drosophila gap gene protein complexes acting as transcriptional repressors. , 1995, The EMBO journal.

[24]  M. Ptashne A genetic switch : phage λ and higher organisms , 1992 .

[25]  W. Gilbert,et al.  Sequencing end-labeled DNA with base-specific chemical cleavages. , 1980, Methods in enzymology.

[26]  Wolfgang Driever,et al.  Determination of spatial domains of zygotic gene expression in the Drosophila embryo by the affinity of binding sites for the bicoid morphogen , 1989, Nature.

[27]  Michael Carey,et al.  A mechanism for synergistic activation of a mammalian gene by GAL4 derivatives , 1990, Nature.

[28]  M. A. Shea,et al.  Free energy coupling within macromolecules. The chemical work of ligand binding at the individual sites in co-operative systems. , 1983, Journal of molecular biology.

[29]  Cooperative DNA-protein interactions. Effects of changing the spacing between adjacent binding sites. , 1994, Journal of molecular biology.

[30]  J. Sambrook,et al.  Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual , 2001 .

[31]  D. Tautz,et al.  Comparison of the gap segmentation gene hunchback between Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila virilis reveals novel modes of evolutionary change. , 1989, The EMBO journal.

[32]  R. Mann The specificity of homeotic gene function , 1995, BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology.

[33]  C. Murre,et al.  Specific residues in the Pbx homeodomain differentially modulate the DNA-binding activity of Hox and Engrailed proteins. , 1997, Development.

[34]  Wolfgang Driever,et al.  The bicoid protein is a positive regulator of hunchback transcription in the early Drosophila embryo , 1989, Nature.

[35]  R. Brent,et al.  A genetic model for interaction of the homeodomain recognition helix with DNA. , 1991, Science.

[36]  Thomas E. Creighton,et al.  Protein function : a practical approach , 1989 .

[37]  H. Jäckle,et al.  Mechanism and Bicoid‐dependent control of hairy stripe 7 expression in the posterior region of the Drosophila embryo , 1997, The EMBO journal.

[38]  B. Dombroski,et al.  Hydroxyl radical "footprinting": high-resolution information about DNA-protein contacts and application to lambda repressor and Cro protein. , 1986, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[39]  T. Scarborough,et al.  The Drosophila morphogenetic protein Bicoid binds DNA cooperatively. , 1996, Development.

[40]  G. Schubiger,et al.  Activation of transcription in Drosophila embryos is a gradual process mediated by the nucleocytoplasmic ratio. , 1996, Genes & development.

[41]  R. Brent,et al.  Specific DNA recognition and intersite spacing are critical for action of the bicoid morphogen , 1994, Molecular and cellular biology.

[42]  S. Triezenberg,et al.  Pattern of aromatic and hydrophobic amino acids critical for one of two subdomains of the VP16 transcriptional activator. , 1993, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[43]  B. Müller-Hill,et al.  The interaction of the recognition helix of lac repressor with lac operator. , 1987, The EMBO journal.

[44]  G. Rubin,et al.  Genetic transformation of Drosophila with transposable element vectors. , 1982, Science.

[45]  Norbert Perrimon,et al.  Activation of posterior gap gene expression in the Drosophila blastoderm , 1995, Nature.

[46]  G. Riddihough,et al.  Individual stripe regulatory elements in the Drosophila hairy promoter respond to maternal, gap, and pair-rule genes. , 1991, Genes & development.

[47]  Roger Brent,et al.  DNA specificity of the bicoid activator protein is determined by homeodomain recognition helix residue 9 , 1989, Cell.

[48]  H. Jäckle,et al.  From gradients to stripes in Drosophila embryogenesis: filling in the gaps. , 1996, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[49]  B. Müller-Hill,et al.  How Trp repressor binds to its operator. , 1990, The EMBO journal.

[50]  M. Tanaka,et al.  Modulation of promoter occupancy by cooperative DNA binding and activation-domain function is a major determinant of transcriptional regulation by activators in vivo. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[51]  V. Bloomfield Biophysical Chemistry , 2020, Definitions.

[52]  C. Desplan,et al.  Homeodomain Proteins: Cooperating to be different , 1995, Current Biology.

[53]  Gerald M. Rubin,et al.  TAFIIs Mediate Activation of Transcription in the Drosophila Embryo , 1998, Cell.

[54]  Margaret Ann Shea,et al.  Quantitative model for gene regulation by ? phage repressor , 1997 .

[55]  C. Nüsslein-Volhard,et al.  A gradient of nuclear localization of the dorsal protein determines dorsoventral pattern in the Drosophila embryo , 1989, Cell.

[56]  Donald F. Senear,et al.  [9] Quantitative DNase footprint titration: A method for studying protein-DNA interactions , 1986 .

[57]  R. Tjian,et al.  TAFs mediate transcriptional activation and promoter selectivity. , 1996, Trends in biochemical sciences.

[58]  Michael Carey,et al.  How different eukaryotic transcriptional activators can cooperate promiscuously , 1990, Nature.

[59]  C. Cantor,et al.  Biophysical Chemistry: Part II: Techniques for the Study of Biological Structure and Function , 1980 .

[60]  F. Studier,et al.  Use of bacteriophage T7 RNA polymerase to direct selective high-level expression of cloned genes. , 1986, Journal of molecular biology.

[61]  Alexander D. Johnson,et al.  Heterodimerization of the yeast homeodomain transcriptional regulators alpha 2 and a1 induces an interfacial helix in alpha 2. , 1994, Biochemistry.

[62]  M Hoch,et al.  Spatial control of the gap gene knirps in the Drosophila embryo by posterior morphogen system. , 1992, Science.

[63]  M. Bate,et al.  The development of Drosophila melanogaster , 1993 .

[64]  M. Levine,et al.  Transcriptional regulation of a pair-rule stripe in Drosophila. , 1991, Genes & development.

[65]  R. Sauer,et al.  Isolation of lambda repressor mutants with defects in cooperative operator binding. , 1993, Biochemistry.

[66]  Q. Lu,et al.  Structural determinants within Pbx1 that mediate cooperative DNA binding with pentapeptide-containing Hox proteins: proposal for a model of a Pbx1-Hox-DNA complex , 1996, Molecular and cellular biology.

[67]  M. Biggin,et al.  Cooperative binding at a distance by even-skipped protein correlates with repression and suggests a mechanism of silencing , 1993, Molecular and cellular biology.

[68]  C. Murre,et al.  Hox gene products modulate the DNA binding activity of Pbx1 and Pbx2 , 1995, Mechanisms of Development.

[69]  M. Chalfie,et al.  Cooperative interactions between the Caenorhabditis elegans homeoproteins UNC-86 and MEC-3. , 1993, Science.

[70]  M. A. Shea,et al.  Quantitative DNase footprint titration: a method for studying protein-DNA interactions. , 1986, Methods in enzymology.

[71]  A. Johnson,et al.  The carboxy-terminal tail of the homeo domain protein alpha 2 is required for function with a second homeo domain protein. , 1993, Genes & development.

[72]  K. Murata,et al.  Transformation of intact yeast cells treated with alkali cations. , 1984, Journal of bacteriology.

[73]  C. Desplan,et al.  Cooperative dimerization of paired class homeo domains on DNA. , 1993, Genes & development.

[74]  A. Laughon,et al.  DNA binding specificity of homeodomains. , 1991, Biochemistry.

[75]  Dana L. Smith,et al.  A molecular mechanism for combinatorial control in yeast: MCM1 protein sets the spacing and orientation of the homeodomains of an α2 dimer , 1992, Cell.