Field measurements and performance analysis of an 802.16 system in a suburban environment

This paper investigates the actual measured performance of an 802.16-based system. A measurement methodology for evaluating the performance is proposed, which is then used for studying and comparing the results of different scenarios. More specifically, the influences of changing the modem height from 2.5 m to 6 m and base station height from 15 m to 45 m are analyzed and discussed in this paper, and it will be shown that only the latter one has a significant effect on the coverage and the performance. Furthermore, the relationship between the carrier-to-interference-noise ratio (CINR) and the wireless link throughput is analyzed, and a semi-empirical model will be proposed. The model remains identical for the different scenarios, emphasizing the usefulness of the obtained model. Indoor reception is also analyzed, and it will be shown that the reception at locations close to the window is approximately 7 dB higher than deeper inside the building. A profound statistical analysis is then performed to validate both the performance measurements and the model, and excellent correspondence is obtained. Finally, as the system supports link adaptive modulation and coding, the results of its effectiveness are discussed in this paper.

[1]  Luc Martens,et al.  Evaluation of Link Performance of an Indoor 802.11g Network , 2008, 2008 5th IEEE Consumer Communications and Networking Conference.

[2]  Charles P. Rubenstein An A+ Certification Program. , 2003 .

[3]  Tsourakis Theodoros,et al.  WiMax network planning and system's performance evaluation , 2007, 2007 IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference.

[4]  Luc Martens,et al.  Performance evaluation of broadband fixed wireless system based on IEEE 802.16 , 2006, IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference, 2006. WCNC 2006..

[5]  Theodore S. Rappaport,et al.  Measured Traffic Statistics and Throughput of IEEE 802.11b Public WLAN Hotspots with Three Different Applications , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.

[6]  Ieee Microwave Theory,et al.  Part 16: Air Interface for Fixed and Mobile Broadband Wireless Access Systems — Amendment for Physical and Medium Access Control Layers for Combined Fixed and Mobile Operation in Licensed Bands , 2003 .

[7]  C. Hoymann,et al.  The HIPERMAN Standard – a Performance Analysis , 2003 .

[8]  Luc Martens,et al.  Influence of Channel Models and MIMO on the Performance of a System based on IEEE 802.16 , 2007, 2007 IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference.

[9]  Tianlin Wang,et al.  Network performance analysis on IEEE 802.11g with different protocols and signal to noise ratio values , 2005, Second IFIP International Conference on Wireless and Optical Communications Networks, 2005. WOCN 2005..

[10]  Carsten F. Ball,et al.  Performance evaluation of IEEE802.16 WiMax with fixed and mobile subscribers in tight reuse , 2006, Eur. Trans. Telecommun..

[11]  Loutfi Nuaymi,et al.  Simple Capacity Estimations in WIMAX/802.16 System , 2006, 2006 IEEE 17th International Symposium on Personal, Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications.

[12]  K. Ivanov,et al.  Comparison of IEEE 802 . 16 WiMax Scenarios with Fixed and Mobile Subscribers in Tight Reuse , 2005 .

[13]  S.-G. Haggman,et al.  Performance Improvement of IEEE802.16-2004 System in Jamming Environment via Link Adaptation , 2006, MILCOM 2006 - 2006 IEEE Military Communications conference.

[14]  Jeffrey G. Andrews,et al.  Broadband wireless access with WiMax/802.16: current performance benchmarks and future potential , 2005, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[15]  Michael R. Souryal,et al.  Link assessment in an indoor 802.11 network , 2006, IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference, 2006. WCNC 2006..

[16]  Benjamin E. Henty Throughput Measurements and Empirical Prediction Models for IEEE 802.11b Wireless LAN (WLAN) Installations , 2001 .