Multiple robot / single human interaction: effects on perceived workload

This paper presents results from a user evaluation of a real multiple robot system in which the human's perceived workload and performance were measured. Participants completed tasks with one, two and four real heterogeneous mobile ground-based robots for indoor material transportation tasks. Twelve participants completed four trials of each task over two days. Generally speaking, little difference was found between the one- and two-robot tasks; however, perceived workload significantly increased while performance decreased during the four-robot task. A correlation analysis found that perceived workload increased as the number of commands (in total and by command type) and completion times increased. The highest number of accidents and user errors occurred during the four-robot task. In order to increase the number of robots a single human can supervise, the human must be provided with capabilities that reduce the number of required commands while also optimising the human's interactions with the robots.

[1]  C. Wickens,et al.  An Introduction to Human Factors Engineering Second Edition , 2010 .

[2]  Ronald C. Arkin,et al.  Usability evaluation of high-level user assistance for robot mission specification , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part C (Applications and Reviews).

[3]  David B. Kaber,et al.  Effects of Visual Interface Design, and Control Mode and Latency on Performance, Telepresence and Workload in a Teleoperation Task , 2000 .

[4]  Maria L. Gini,et al.  Sharing control [multiple miniature robots] , 2002, IEEE Robotics Autom. Mag..

[5]  Jean Scholtz,et al.  Beyond Usability Evaluation: Analysis of Human-Robot Interaction at a Major Robotics Competition , 2004, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[6]  Christopher D. Wickens,et al.  A model for types and levels of human interaction with automation , 2000, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part A.

[7]  J.V. Draper,et al.  Workload, flow, and telepresence during teleoperation , 1996, Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[8]  Terrence Fong,et al.  Multi-robot remote driving with collaborative control , 2003, IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron..

[9]  Xiaoping Yun,et al.  Effect of the dynamic interaction on coordinated control of mobile manipulators , 1996, IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom..

[10]  Ruzena Bajcsy,et al.  Cooperative material handling by human and robotic agents: module development and system synthesis , 1995, Proceedings 1995 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. Human Robot Interaction and Cooperative Robots.

[11]  Thomas E. Nygren,et al.  Psychometric Properties of Subjective Workload Measurement Techniques: Implications for Their Use in the Assessment of Perceived Mental Workload , 1991 .

[12]  Heath A. Ruff,et al.  Human Interaction with Levels of Automation and Decision-Aid Fidelity in the Supervisory Control of Multiple Simulated Unmanned Air Vehicles , 2002, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[13]  J. C. Byers,et al.  Comparison of Four Subjective Workload Rating Scales , 1992 .

[14]  Robin R. Murphy,et al.  Human-robot interaction in rescue robotics , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part C (Applications and Reviews).

[15]  Christopher D. Wickens,et al.  An introduction to human factors engineering , 1997 .

[16]  Ruzena Bajcsy,et al.  Experiments in behavior composition , 1997, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[17]  Sebastian Thrun,et al.  A System for Volumetric Robotic Mapping of Underground Mines , 2002 .

[18]  Yili Liu,et al.  Introduction to Human Factors Engineering (2nd Edition) , 2003 .

[19]  Max Mintz,et al.  Feature-based localization using fixed ultrasonic transducers , 1995, Proceedings 1995 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. Human Robot Interaction and Cooperative Robots.

[20]  Vijay Kumar,et al.  On singular behaviors of impedance-based repeatable control for redundant robots , 2001, J. Field Robotics.

[21]  Salvatore P Schipani,et al.  An Evaluation of Operator Workload, During Partially-Autonomous Vehicle Operations , 2003 .

[22]  Hiroshi Furukawa,et al.  A flexible delegation-type interface enhances system performance in human supervision of multiple robots: empirical studies with RoboFlag , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics - Part A: Systems and Humans.

[23]  Ruzena Bajcsy,et al.  Decision-theoretic approach to robust fusion of location data , 1999 .

[24]  S. Hart,et al.  Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of Empirical and Theoretical Research , 1988 .

[25]  Julie A. Adams,et al.  Human Management of a Hierarchical System for the Control of Multiple Mobile Robots ( Dissertation Proposal ) MS-CIS-95-17 GRASP Lab 392 , 1994 .

[26]  Roger A. Chadwick,et al.  The Impacts of Multiple Robots and Display Views: An Urban Search and Rescue Simulation , 2005 .

[27]  David B. Kaber,et al.  Design of Automation for Telerobots and the Effect on Performance, Operator Situation Awareness, and Subjective Workload , 2000 .

[28]  Maria Gini,et al.  Sharing control: Presenting a framework for the operation and coordination of multiple miniature rob , 2002 .