Tube shunt coverage with gamma-irradiated cornea allograft (VisionGraft)

Purpose To investigate the clinical outcomes of tube shunt coverage using sterile gamma-irradiated cornea allograft. Patients and methods The Wills Eye Hospital Glaucoma Research Center retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 165 patients who underwent glaucoma tube shunt procedures using sterile gamma-irradiated cornea allograft (VisionGraft) between December 2012 and November 2013. Demographic characteristics, type of tube shunt, and position were noted. Complications were recorded at 1 day; 1 week; 1, 3, 6, and 12 months; and on the final postoperative visit. Results One hundred and sixty-nine eyes of 165 patients were included. The mean follow-up time was 4.8±3.5 (ranging from 1 to 16) months. There was no evidence of immunological reaction, infection, or exposure in 166 eyes (98.2%). Three eyes (1.8%) experienced graft or tube exposure within the first 3 postoperative months. Two of the cases had underlying diseases: bullous pemphigoid and chronic allergic conjunctivitis. Conclusion Coverage of tube shunts using gamma-irradiated cornea allograft had a low exposure rate and was well tolerated. The graft can be stored long term at room temperature and has an excellent postoperative cosmetic appearance.

[1]  J. Myers,et al.  Evaluation of Risk Factors for Glaucoma Drainage Device–related Erosions: A Retrospective Case-Control Study , 2015, Journal of glaucoma.

[2]  C. Curcio,et al.  Outcomes of Shunt Tube Coverage With Glycerol Preserved Cornea Versus Pericardium , 2014, Journal of glaucoma.

[3]  C. Sadik,et al.  Leukotrienes orchestrating allergic skin inflammation , 2013, Experimental dermatology.

[4]  A. Chuang,et al.  Aqueous Shunt Exposure: A Retrospective Review of Repair Outcome , 2013, Journal of glaucoma.

[5]  Donald L. Budenz,et al.  Risk Factors for Tube Shunt Exposure: A Matched Case-Control Study , 2013, Journal of ophthalmology.

[6]  R. Wolf,et al.  Bullous pemphigoid: etiology, pathogenesis, and inducing factors: facts and controversies. , 2013, Clinics in dermatology.

[7]  P. Netland,et al.  Gamma-irradiated Cornea Allograft for Glaucoma Surgery , 2013, Journal of glaucoma.

[8]  Lauren S Blieden,et al.  Short-Term Outcomes of KeraSys Patch Graft for Glaucoma Drainage Devices: A Case Series , 2013, Journal of ophthalmology.

[9]  W. Stark,et al.  The Intraoperative Impression and Postoperative Outcomes of Gamma-Irradiated Corneas in Corneal and Glaucoma Patch Surgery , 2011, Cornea.

[10]  S. Gedde,et al.  Update on aqueous shunts. , 2011, Experimental eye research.

[11]  R. Ritch,et al.  Use of amniotic membrane graft in glaucoma shunt surgery. , 2011, Ophthalmic surgery, lasers & imaging : the official journal of the International Society for Imaging in the Eye.

[12]  S. Mosaed Update on Aqueous Shunts in Glaucoma , 2011, International ophthalmology clinics.

[13]  C. Costagliola,et al.  Sutureless Human Sclera Donor Patch Graft for Ahmed Glaucoma Valve , 2010, European journal of ophthalmology.

[14]  W. C. Stewart,et al.  Incidence of Conjunctival Exposure following Drainage Device Implantation in Patients with Glaucoma , 2010, European journal of ophthalmology.

[15]  N. Y. Lee,et al.  Risk factors of implant exposure outside the conjunctiva after Ahmed glaucoma valve implantation , 2009, Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology.

[16]  D. Tan,et al.  Corneal Patch Graft Repair of Exposed Glaucoma Drainage Implants , 2008, Cornea.

[17]  J. Henderer,et al.  Comparison of Single Thickness and Double Thickness Processed Pericardium Patch Graft in Glaucoma Drainage Device Surgery: A Single Surgeon Comparison of Outcome , 2008, Journal of glaucoma.

[18]  Á. Cabello,et al.  Long-term persistence of fascia lata patch graft in glaucoma drainage device surgery. , 2005, European journal of ophthalmology.

[19]  D. Edward,et al.  Endophthalmitis associated with the Ahmed glaucoma valve implant , 2005, British Journal of Ophthalmology.

[20]  S. Eğrilmez,et al.  The effect of vernal keratoconjunctivitis on clinical outcomes of penetrating keratoplasty for keratoconus. , 2004, Canadian journal of ophthalmology. Journal canadien d'ophtalmologie.

[21]  Q. Nguyen Avoiding and managing complications of glaucoma drainage implants , 2004, Current opinion in ophthalmology.

[22]  R. Rohwer,et al.  Inactivation of viral and prion pathogens by γ‐irradiation under conditions that maintain the integrity of human albumin , 2003, Vox sanguinis.

[23]  M. F. Smith,et al.  A Comparison of Glaucoma Drainage Implant Tube Coverage , 2002, Journal of glaucoma.

[24]  G. Grabner,et al.  Repair of a late-onset filtering bleb leak using a corneal graft shaped with an excimer laser. , 2001, Ophthalmic surgery and lasers.

[25]  R. Fechtner,et al.  Tube erosion following insertion of a glaucoma drainage device with a pericardial patch graft. , 1999, Archives of ophthalmology.

[26]  H. Ishikawa,et al.  Pericardial Patch Grafts in Glaucoma Implant Surgery , 1997, Journal of glaucoma.

[27]  R. Ritch,et al.  Clear corneal graft overlying the seton tube to facilitate laser suture lysis. , 1996, American journal of ophthalmology.

[28]  J. Brandt Patch grafts of dehydrated cadaveric dura mater for tube-shunt glaucoma surgery. , 1993, Archives of ophthalmology.