The role of bedrock topography on subsurface storm flow

We conducted a detailed study of subsurface flow and water table response coupled with digital terrain analysis (DTA) of surface and subsurface features at the hillslope scale in Panola Mountain Research Watershed (PMRW), Georgia. Subsurface storm flow contributions of macropore and matrix flow in different sections along an artificial trench face were highly variable in terms of timing, peak flow, recession characteristics, and total flow volume. The trench flow characteristics showed linkages with the spatial tensiometer response defining water table development upslope. DTA of the ground surface did not capture the observed spatial patterns of trench flow or tensiometric response. However, bedrock surface topographic indices significantly improved the estimation of spatial variation of flow at the trench. Point-scale tensiometric data were also more highly correlated with the bedrock surface-based indices. These relationships were further assessed for temporal changes throughout a rainstorm. Linkages between the bedrock indices and the trench flow and spatial water table responses improved during the wetter periods of the rainstorm, when the hillslope became more hydrologically connected. Our results clearly demonstrate that in developing a conceptual framework for understanding the mechanisms of runoff generation, local bedrock topography may be highly significant at the hillslope scale in some catchments where the bedrock surface acts as a relatively impermeable boundary.

[1]  J. McDonnell,et al.  Nitrogen solutes in an Adirondack forested watershed: Importance of dissolved organic nitrogen , 2000 .

[2]  Murugesu Sivapalan,et al.  Modeling the spatial variability of subsurface runoff using a topographic index , 1997 .

[3]  Ross Woods,et al.  The changing spatial variability of subsurface flow across a hillside , 1996 .

[4]  M. Newson,et al.  Soil pipes and pipeflow: A hydrological study in upland Wales , 1980 .

[5]  T. Huntington,et al.  Water, energy, and biogeochemical budgets investigation at Panola Mountain research watershed, Stockbridge, Georgia; a research plan , 1993 .

[6]  K. Beven,et al.  TOPOGRAPHIC CONTROLS ON SUBSURFACE STORM FLOWAT THE HILLSLOPE SCALE FOR TWO HYDROLOGICALLY DISTINCT SMALL CATCHMENTS , 1997 .

[7]  Keith Beven,et al.  Riparian control of stream-water chemistry: Implications for hydrochemical basin models , 1998 .

[8]  R. Moore,et al.  Throughflow variability on a forested hillslope underlain by compacted glacial till , 2000 .

[9]  K. Beven,et al.  THE PREDICTION OF HILLSLOPE FLOW PATHS FOR DISTRIBUTED HYDROLOGICAL MODELLING USING DIGITAL TERRAIN MODELS , 1991 .

[10]  K. Beven.  Process, Heterogeneity and Scale in Modelling Soil Moisture Fluxes , 1997 .

[11]  J. A. Jones.  Pipeflow contributing areas and runoff response , 1997 .

[12]  Keith Beven,et al.  Discharge and water table predictions using a generalised TOPMODEL formulation , 1997 .

[13]  Harold F. Hemond,et al.  Spatial and temporal variability in streamflow generation on the West Fork of Walker Branch Watershed , 1993 .

[14]  J. McDonnell,et al.  Quantifying contributions to storm runoff through end‐member mixing analysis and hydrologic measurements at the Panola Mountain Research Watershed (Georgia, USA) , 2001 .

[15]  Axel Bronstert,et al.  Capabilities and limitations of detailed hillslope hydrological modelling , 1999 .

[16]  Keith Beven,et al.  APPLICATION OF A GENERALIZED TOPMODEL TO THE SMALL RINGELBACH CATCHMENT, VOSGES, FRANCE , 1996 .

[17]  Jeffrey J. McDonnell,et al.  A rationale for old water discharge through macropores in a steep, humid catchment. , 1990 .

[18]  J. C. Thompson,et al.  Are Water Table Variations in a Shallow Forest Soil Consistent with the TOPMODEL Concept , 1996 .

[19]  Norman E. Peters,et al.  Variations in aqueous sulfate concentrations at Panola Mountain, Georgia , 1993 .

[20]  Keith Beven,et al.  Isotope studies of pipeflow at Plynlimon, Wales, UK. , 1996 .

[21]  J.-P. Jordan.  Spatial and temporal variability of stormflow generation processes on a Swiss catchment , 1994 .

[22]  E. O'Loughlin,et al.  Saturation regions in catchments and their relations to soil and topographic properties , 1981 .

[23]  Keith Beven,et al.  Uniqueness of place and process representations in hydrological modelling , 2000 .

[24]  J. Buttle,et al.  Runoff processes on a forested slope on the Canadian shield , 1999 .

[25]  J. McDonnell,et al.  Base cation concentrations in subsurface flow from a forested hillslope: The role of flushing frequency , 1998 .

[26]  Jeffrey J. McDonnell,et al.  Tracer and hydrometric study of preferential flow in large undisturbed soil cores from the Georgia Piedmont, USA , 1999 .

[27]  Keith Beven,et al.  Modelling hydrologic responses in a small forested catchment (Panola Mountain, Georgia, USA): a comparison of the original and a new dynamic TOPMODEL , 2003 .

[28]  B. T. Bunting,et al.  The role of seepage moisture in soil formation, slope development, and stream initiation , 1961 .

[29]  Chantal Gascuel-Odoux,et al.  THE INFLUENCE OF TOPOGRAPHY ON TIME AND SPACE DISTRIBUTION OF SOIL SURFACE WATER CONTENT , 1997 .

[30]  Keith Beven,et al.  Dalton Medal Lecture: How far can we go in distributed hydrological modelling? , 2001 .

[31]  C. T. Haan,et al.  Subsurface flow responses of a small forested catchment in the Ouachita mountains , 1992 .

[32]  J. McDonnell,et al.  Riparian zone flowpath dynamics during snowmelt in a small headwater catchment , 1999 .

[33]  Tracing Hydrologic Pathways Using Chloride at the Panola Mountain Research Watershed, Georgia, USA , 1998 .

[34]  André Musy,et al.  Generalization of TOPMODEL for a power law transmissivity profile , 1997 .

[35]  Thomas A. McMahon,et al.  Physically based hydrologic modeling: 2. Is the concept realistic? , 1992 .

[36]  Keith Beven,et al.  Hydrological processes—Letters. Topographic controls on subsurface storm flow at the hillslope scale for two hydrologically distinct small catchmetns , 1997 .

[37]  Shoji Noguchi,et al.  Flow and solute transport through the soil matrix and macropores of a hillslope segment , 1994 .

[38]  J. Hewlett,et al.  Moisture and energy conditions within a sloping soil mass during drainage , 1963 .

[39]  Keith Beven,et al.  Changing ideas in hydrology — The case of physically-based models , 1989 .

[40]  Tim Burt,et al.  Topographic controls of soil moisture distributions , 1985 .

[41]  Keith Beven,et al.  A Discussion of Distributed Hydrological Modelling , 1990 .

[42]  L. Nyberg.  Spatial variability of soil water content in the covered catchment at Gårdsjön, Sweden , 1996 .

[43]  Yoshinori Tsukamoto,et al.  Runoff process on a steep forested slope , 1988 .

[44]  N. Peters,et al.  Tracing Hydrologic Pathways Using Chloride at the Panola Mountain Research Watershed, Georgia, USA , 1998 .

[45]  S. Schiff,et al.  Physical properties governing groundwater flow in a glacial till catchment , 1993 .

[46]  R. D. Black,et al.  Partial Area Contributions to Storm Runoff in a Small New England Watershed , 1970 .

[47]  Ian D. Moore,et al.  A quasi-dynamic wetness index for characterizing the spatial distribution of zones of surface saturation and , 1994 .

[48]  Keith Beven,et al.  A dynamic TOPMODEL , 2001 .

[49]  S. P. Anderson,et al.  Subsurface flow paths in a steep, unchanneled catchment , 1997 .

[50]  K. Beven,et al.  A physically based, variable contributing area model of basin hydrology , 1979 .