The ASA Classification System as a Predictive Factor to Stay at the Virtual Hybrid Care Hotel
暂无分享,去创建一个
Francisco R. Avila | A. Forte | R. Chadha | Ricardo J Pagán | M. Maniaci | G. Matcha | M. Paulson | Karla C. Maita | Ricardo A. Torres-Guzman | John P. Garcia
[1] Francisco R. Avila,et al. A Virtual Hybrid Care Hotel Model Supports the Recovery of Post-procedural Patients with Mild to Severe Systemic Diseases , 2022, The American surgeon.
[2] Francisco R. Avila,et al. Surgical patient satisfaction with a virtual hybrid care hotel model: A retrospective cohort study , 2022, Annals of Medicine and Surgery.
[3] Patricia K Apruzzese,et al. American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status Classification as a reliable predictor of postoperative medical complications and mortality following ambulatory surgery: an analysis of 2,089,830 ACS-NSQIP outpatient cases , 2021, BMC Surgery.
[4] Anya Ahmed,et al. A systematic literature review of the patient hotel model , 2021, Disability and rehabilitation.
[5] D. Flanigan,et al. Unplanned Emergency Visits and Admissions After Orthopaedic Ambulatory Surgery in the First 2 Years of Operation of a University Ambulatory Surgery Center , 2020, The American journal of sports medicine.
[6] Yi-Ju Li,et al. Unplanned hospital admission after ambulatory surgery: a retrospective, single cohort study , 2020, Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie.
[7] A. Asher,et al. Identifying the most appropriate lumbar decompression patients for ambulatory surgery centers – A pilot study using inpatient and outpatient hospital data , 2019, Journal of Clinical Neuroscience.
[8] J. Gillion,et al. Factors of selection and failure of ambulatory incisional hernia repair: A cohort study of 1429 patients. , 2019, Journal of visceral surgery.
[9] B. Murthy,et al. A review of ASA physical status – historical perspectives and modern developments , 2019, Anaesthesia.
[10] M. Hawn,et al. Factors Associated with Hospital Admission after Outpatient Surgery in the Veterans Health Administration , 2018, Health services research.
[11] F. Davidoff,et al. SQUIRE 2.0 (Standards for QUality Improvement Reporting Excellence): revised publication guidelines from a detailed consensus process , 2015, BMJ Quality & Safety.
[12] N. Hackett,et al. ASA class is a reliable independent predictor of medical complications and mortality following surgery. , 2015, International journal of surgery.
[13] R. Adelman,et al. Caregiver burden: a clinical review. , 2014, JAMA.
[14] J. Fitz-Henry. The ASA classification and peri-operative risk. , 2011, Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England.
[15] L. R. Pasternak,et al. Ambulatory gynaecological surgery: risk and assessment. , 2005, Best practice & research. Clinical obstetrics & gynaecology.
[16] W. Owens,et al. American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status Classification System in not a risk classification system. , 2001, Anesthesiology.
[17] R. Dripps,et al. The role of anesthesia in surgical mortality. , 1961, JAMA.
[18] Meyer Saklad,et al. GRADING OF PATIENTS FOR SURGICAL PROCEDURES , 1941 .
[19] S. Tenconi,et al. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy as day-surgery procedure: current indications and patients' selection. , 2008, International journal of surgery.