The ASA Classification System as a Predictive Factor to Stay at the Virtual Hybrid Care Hotel

INTRODUCTION The Care Hotel is a virtual hybrid care model for postoperative patients after low-risk procedures which allow recovery in an outpatient environment. This study aimed to analyze if the American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status (ASA PS) Classification System can be used as a predictive factor for staying at Mayo Clinic's Care Hotel. METHODS This retrospective cohort study was conducted between July 23, 2020, and June 4, 2021, at Mayo Clinic in Florida, a 306-bed community academic hospital. ASA PS Class and post-procedure care setting (Care Hotel vs inpatient ward) were collected. Patients were classified into two ASA PS groups (ASA PS Classes 1-2 and 3-4). Pearson's Chi-square test was used to determine if the ASA PS Class and having stayed or not at the Care Hotel were independent and an Odds Ratio (OR) calculated. RESULTS Out of 392 surgical and procedural patients, 272 (69.39%) chose the Care Hotel and 120 (30.61%) chose the inpatient ward. There was a statistically significant association between ASA PS Class and staying at the Care Hotel, P < .01. The OR of preferring to stay at the Care Hotel in patients with ASA PS Class 1-2 vs ASA PC Class 3-4 was 1.91 (P = .0041, 95% CI: 1.229-2.982). CONCLUSION Patients with ASA PS Classes 1-2 are almost twice as likely to elect to stay at the Care Hotel compared to those with ASA PS Classes 3-4. This finding may help care teams focus their Care hotel recruitment efforts.

[1]  Francisco R. Avila,et al.  A Virtual Hybrid Care Hotel Model Supports the Recovery of Post-procedural Patients with Mild to Severe Systemic Diseases , 2022, The American surgeon.

[2]  Francisco R. Avila,et al.  Surgical patient satisfaction with a virtual hybrid care hotel model: A retrospective cohort study , 2022, Annals of Medicine and Surgery.

[3]  Patricia K Apruzzese,et al.  American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status Classification as a reliable predictor of postoperative medical complications and mortality following ambulatory surgery: an analysis of 2,089,830 ACS-NSQIP outpatient cases , 2021, BMC Surgery.

[4]  Anya Ahmed,et al.  A systematic literature review of the patient hotel model , 2021, Disability and rehabilitation.

[5]  D. Flanigan,et al.  Unplanned Emergency Visits and Admissions After Orthopaedic Ambulatory Surgery in the First 2 Years of Operation of a University Ambulatory Surgery Center , 2020, The American journal of sports medicine.

[6]  Yi-Ju Li,et al.  Unplanned hospital admission after ambulatory surgery: a retrospective, single cohort study , 2020, Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie.

[7]  A. Asher,et al.  Identifying the most appropriate lumbar decompression patients for ambulatory surgery centers – A pilot study using inpatient and outpatient hospital data , 2019, Journal of Clinical Neuroscience.

[8]  J. Gillion,et al.  Factors of selection and failure of ambulatory incisional hernia repair: A cohort study of 1429 patients. , 2019, Journal of visceral surgery.

[9]  B. Murthy,et al.  A review of ASA physical status – historical perspectives and modern developments , 2019, Anaesthesia.

[10]  M. Hawn,et al.  Factors Associated with Hospital Admission after Outpatient Surgery in the Veterans Health Administration , 2018, Health services research.

[11]  F. Davidoff,et al.  SQUIRE 2.0 (Standards for QUality Improvement Reporting Excellence): revised publication guidelines from a detailed consensus process , 2015, BMJ Quality & Safety.

[12]  N. Hackett,et al.  ASA class is a reliable independent predictor of medical complications and mortality following surgery. , 2015, International journal of surgery.

[13]  R. Adelman,et al.  Caregiver burden: a clinical review. , 2014, JAMA.

[14]  J. Fitz-Henry The ASA classification and peri-operative risk. , 2011, Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England.

[15]  L. R. Pasternak,et al.  Ambulatory gynaecological surgery: risk and assessment. , 2005, Best practice & research. Clinical obstetrics & gynaecology.

[16]  W. Owens,et al.  American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status Classification System in not a risk classification system. , 2001, Anesthesiology.

[17]  R. Dripps,et al.  The role of anesthesia in surgical mortality. , 1961, JAMA.

[18]  Meyer Saklad,et al.  GRADING OF PATIENTS FOR SURGICAL PROCEDURES , 1941 .

[19]  S. Tenconi,et al.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy as day-surgery procedure: current indications and patients' selection. , 2008, International journal of surgery.