Improving classification accuracy of airborne LiDAR intensity data by geometric calibration and radiometric correction

Airborne light detection and ranging (LiDAR) systems are used to measure the range (distance from the sensor to the target) and the intensity data (the backscattered energy from the target). LiDAR has been used extensively to model the topography of the Earth surface. Nowadays, LiDAR systems operating in the near-infrared spectral range are also gaining high interest for land cover classification and object recognition. LiDAR system requires geometric calibration (GC) and radiometric correction (RC) in order to maximize the benefit from the collected LiDAR data. This paper evaluates the impact of the GC and the RC of the LiDAR data on land cover classification. The procedure includes the use of a quasi-rigorous method for the GC and the radar (range) equation for the RC of the LiDAR data. The geometric calibration procedure is used to adjust the coordinates of the point cloud by removing the impact of biases in the system parameters as well as deriving corrected ranges and scan angles (in the absence of the system’s raw measurements) for the RC process. The geometrically calibrated ranges and scan angles are then used to correct the intensity data from the atmospheric attenuation and background backscattering based on the radar (range) equation. The atmospheric attenuation, which has not been fully addressed in the previous literature, is modeled by considering the parameters of absorption as well as scattering derived from existing empirical models and public (free) molecular absorption database. A LiDAR dataset covering an urban area is used to evaluate the effect of the GC and RC of the LiDAR data on land cover classification. The results are evaluated using a true ortho-rectified aerial image acquired during the same flight mission. The classification results show an accuracy improvement of about 9.4–12.8% for the LiDAR data used after the GC and RC. The study provides a practical approach for the LiDAR system GC and RC which can be implemented by most of the data end users. The outcome from this research work is a data processing tool that maximizes the benefits of using the intensity data for object recognition and land cover classification, which will be quite important for LiDAR data users.

[1]  Harri Kaartinen,et al.  Effect of Target Moisture on Laser Scanner Intensity , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[2]  A. Bucholtz,et al.  Rayleigh-scattering calculations for the terrestrial atmosphere. , 1995, Applied optics.

[3]  Ayman F. Habib,et al.  Alternative Methodologies for LiDAR System Calibration , 2010, Remote. Sens..

[4]  Lorenzo Bruzzone,et al.  Fusion of Hyperspectral and LIDAR Remote Sensing Data for Classification of Complex Forest Areas , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[5]  Juha Hyyppä,et al.  Correcting Airborne Laser Scanning Intensity Data for Automatic Gain Control Effect , 2010, IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters.

[6]  Juha Hyyppä,et al.  Radiometric Calibration of LIDAR Intensity With Commercially Available Reference Targets , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[7]  Boris Jutzi,et al.  Investigations on surface reflection models for intensity normalization in airborne laser scanning (ALS) data , 2010 .

[8]  James R. Anderson,et al.  A land use and land cover classification system for use with remote sensor data , 1976 .

[9]  Gang Li,et al.  The HITRAN 2008 molecular spectroscopic database , 2005 .

[10]  D. W. Latham,et al.  A rediscussion of the atmospheric extinction and the absolute spectral-energy distribution of Vega. , 1975 .

[11]  Changjae Kim,et al.  New Methodologies for True Orthophoto Generation , 2007 .

[12]  Derek D. Lichti,et al.  Rigorous approach to bore-sight self-calibration in airborne laser scanning , 2006 .

[13]  George Vosselman,et al.  Adjustment of airborne laser altimetry strips , 2004 .

[14]  O. Steinvall,et al.  Effects of target shape and reflection on laser radar cross sections. , 2000, Applied optics.

[15]  H. Maas Methods for measuring height and planimetry discrepancies in airborne laserscanner data , 2002 .

[16]  Norbert Pfeifer,et al.  A Comprehensive Automated 3D Approach for Building Extraction, Reconstruction, and Regularization from Airborne Laser Scanning Point Clouds , 2008, Sensors.

[17]  H. Burman Calibration and orientation of airborne image and laser scanner data using GPS and INS , 2000 .

[18]  Anton Dandarov,et al.  A General Model of the Atmospheric Scattering in the Wavelength Interval 300 - 1100nm , 2009 .

[19]  Sagi Filin Calibration of airborne and spaceborne laser altimeters using natural surfaces , 2001 .

[20]  N. Pfeifer,et al.  Correction of laser scanning intensity data: Data and model-driven approaches , 2007 .

[21]  Shu-Ching Chen,et al.  Automatic Construction of Building Footprints From Airborne LIDAR Data , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[22]  A. Jelalian Laser radar systems , 1980 .

[23]  Juha Hyyppä,et al.  RADIOMETRIC CALIBRATION OF ALS INTENSITY , 2007 .

[24]  Chris Hopkinson,et al.  Mapping piping plover (Charadrius melodus melodus) habitat in coastal areas using airborne lidar data , 2007 .

[25]  Ants Vain,et al.  Use of Naturally Available Reference Targets to Calibrate Airborne Laser Scanning Intensity Data , 2009, Sensors.

[26]  V. E. Zuev Laser-light transmission through the atmosphere , 1976 .

[27]  Doreen S. Boyd,et al.  VALIDATION OF AIRBORNE LIDAR INTENSITY VALUES FROM A FORESTED LANDSCAPE USING HYMAP DATA: PRELIMINARY ANALYSES , 2007 .

[28]  P. Sterzai,et al.  Radiometric correction in laser scanning , 2006 .

[30]  E. Bork,et al.  Integrating LIDAR data and multispectral imagery for enhanced classification of rangeland vegetation: A meta analysis , 2007 .

[31]  Harri Kaartinen,et al.  Remote Sensing Radiometric Calibration of Terrestrial Laser Scanners with External Reference Targets , 2022 .

[32]  Sarah Bretz,et al.  Preliminary survey of the solar reflectance of cool roofing materials , 1997 .

[33]  J. Brasington,et al.  Object-based land cover classification using airborne LiDAR , 2008 .

[34]  T. Webster,et al.  Object-oriented land cover classification of lidar-derived surfaces , 2006 .

[35]  Antero Kukko,et al.  Effect of incidence angle on laser scanner intensity and surface data. , 2008, Applied optics.

[36]  Sanna Kaasalainen,et al.  Aperture size effects on backscatter intensity measurements in Earth and space remote sensing. , 2008, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[37]  Boyan Petkov,et al.  Improved algorithm for calculations of Rayleigh-scattering optical depth in standard atmospheres. , 2005, Applied optics.