Radiological findings of screen-detected cancers in a multi-centre randomized, controlled trial of mammographic screening in women from age 40 to 48 years.

AIM To elucidate the mammographic findings of screen-detected cancers in women screened between 40-48 years, and to establish the frequency and nature of abnormal findings on previous mammograms in women with screen-detected cancers. METHODS A radiology review panel consisting of three experienced breast radiologists viewed the screening mammograms in chronological order, confirming that any abnormalities detected corresponded to the cancers detected at later screens. An analysis correlating mammographic features with median invasive size and the proportion measuring less than 10 and 15mm was performed. RESULTS Two hundred and thirty-two women had screen-detected invasive cancers with mammograms available for review. The most frequent features seen at diagnosis were spiculate mass, ill-defined mass, granular calcification, deformity and comedo calcification. Thirty-four percent of mammograms showed calcification. The mammographic sign associated with smallest median size was calcification. Calcification was also the mammographic abnormality most frequently associated with cancers <10mm in size. In total there were 147 abnormal previous screens of 87 women. The most commonly missed features were granular microcalcification, deformity and ill-defined mass. Of the missed abnormalities 20% were classified as malignant, 43% as subtle change and 32% as non-specific. CONCLUSION Compared with older women, screen-detected cancer in younger women more commonly manifests as calcification and less frequently a spiculate mass. Calcification is the sign most frequently associated with invasive cancers <10mm in size. Calcification and deformity are the signs most frequently seen on the previous mammograms of women with screen-detected cancer.

[1]  I. Ellis,et al.  Correlations between the mammographic features of screen detected invasive breast cancer and pathological prognostic factors , 1997 .

[2]  S Field,et al.  Second round cancers: how many were visible on the first round of the UK National Breast Screening Programme, three years earlier? , 1998, Clinical radiology.

[3]  A. Kavanagh,et al.  Incidence of invasive breast cancer and ductal carcinoma in situ in a screening program by age: should older women continue screening? , 2004, Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology.

[4]  F J Gilbert,et al.  Incident round cancers: what lessons can we learn? , 1998, Clinical radiology.

[5]  A. Ugnat,et al.  Survival of women with breast cancer in Ottawa, Canada: variation with age, stage, histology, grade and treatment , 2004, British Journal of Cancer.

[6]  S. Duffy,et al.  Radiology review of the UKCCCR Breast Screening Frequency Trial: potential improvements in sensitivity and lead time of radiological signs. , 2003, Clinical radiology.

[7]  C. Wells,et al.  Correlation between ultrasound characteristics, mammographic findings and histological grade in patients with invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast. , 2000, Clinical radiology.

[8]  I. Ellis,et al.  Mammographic features of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) present on previous mammography. , 1999, Clinical radiology.

[9]  Andrew Evans,et al.  Mammographic sensitivity in women under 50 years presenting symptomatically with breast cancer , 1995 .

[10]  S. Moss,et al.  Randomised controlled trial of mammographic screening in women from age 40: results of screening in the first 10 years , 2005, British Journal of Cancer.

[11]  Alan C. Evans,et al.  The pathological and radiological features of screen-detected breast cancers diagnosed following arbitration of discordant double reading opinions. , 2005, Clinical radiology.

[12]  L. Mariani,et al.  Relationships between age, mammographic features and pathological tumour characteristics in non-palpable breast cancer. , 2000, The British journal of radiology.

[13]  J. Wolfe Risk for breast cancer development determined by mammographic parenchymal pattern , 1976, Cancer.