Embedding linear programming in multi objective genetic algorithms for reducing the size of the search space with application to leakage minimization in water distribution networks

This paper shows how embedding a local search algorithm, such as the iterated linear programming (LP), in the multi-objective genetic algorithms (MOGAs) can lead to a reduction in the search space and then to the improvement of the computational efficiency of the MOGAs. In fact, when the optimization problem features both continuous real variables and discrete integer variables, the search space can be subdivided into two sub-spaces, related to the two kinds of variables respectively. The problem can then be structured in such a way that MOGAs can be used for the search within the sub-space of the discrete integer variables. For each solution proposed by the MOGAs, the iterated LP can be used for the search within the sub-space of the continuous real variables. An example of this hybrid algorithm is provided herein as far as water distribution networks are concerned. In particular, the problem of the optimal location of control valves for leakage attenuation is considered. In this framework, the MOGA NSGAII is used to search for the optimal valve locations and for the identification of the isolation valves which have to be closed in the network in order to improve the effectiveness of the control valves whereas the iterated linear programming is used to search for the optimal settings of the control valves. The application to two case studies clearly proves the reduction in the MOGA search space size to render the hybrid algorithm more efficient than the MOGA without iterated linear programming embedded. The iterated LP was embedded in a MOGA to improve the computational efficiency.The research space was subdivided between the component algorithms of the hybrid algorithm.The hybrid algorithm was tested against a "fully genetic" algorithm.

[1]  Enrico Creaco,et al.  Low Level Hybrid Procedure for the Multi-objective Design of Water Distribution Networks , 2014 .

[2]  Avi Ostfeld,et al.  Battle of the Water Networks II , 2014 .

[3]  Stefano Alvisi,et al.  RESEARCH ARTICLE Segment identification in water distribution systems , 2011 .

[4]  E. Todini,et al.  A gradient algorithm for the analysis of pipe networks , 1988 .

[5]  Roberto Gueli,et al.  Discussion of “Optimal Location of Control Valves in Pipe Networks by Genetic Algorithm” by L. F. R. Reis, R. M. Porto, and F. H. Chaudhry , 1999 .

[6]  Luigino Zovatto,et al.  Optimal Location and Control of Pressure Reducing Valves in Water Networks , 2009 .

[7]  Avi Ostfeld,et al.  Evolutionary algorithms and other metaheuristics in water resources: Current status, research challenges and future directions , 2014, Environ. Model. Softw..

[8]  Zoran Kapelan,et al.  Hybrid metaheuristics for multi-objective design of water distribution systems , 2014 .

[9]  Zoran Kapelan,et al.  Probabilistic building block identification for the optimal design and rehabilitation of water distribution systems , 2009 .

[10]  Stefano Alvisi,et al.  A heuristic procedure for the automatic creation of district metered areas in water distribution systems , 2014 .

[11]  M. Di Natale,et al.  A District Sectorization for Water Network Protection from Intentional Contamination , 2014 .

[12]  M. Franchini,et al.  Comparison of Newton-Raphson Global and Loop Algorithms for Water Distribution Network Resolution , 2014 .

[13]  Giuseppe Pezzinga,et al.  Combined optimization of pipes and control valves in water distribution networks , 2005 .

[14]  Stefano Alvisi,et al.  Segment identification in water distribution systems , 2011 .

[15]  Enrico Creaco,et al.  Fast network multi-objective design algorithm combined with an a posteriori procedure for reliability evaluation under various operational scenarios , 2012 .

[16]  K. Vairavamoorthy,et al.  Leakage Reduction in Water Distribution Systems: Optimal Valve Control , 1998 .

[17]  Luisa Fernanda Ribeiro Reis,et al.  Optimal Location of Control Valves in Pipe Networks by Genetic Algorithm , 1997 .

[18]  Kalyanmoy Deb,et al.  Calibration and Optimal Leakage Management for a Real Water Distribution Network , 2011 .

[19]  Helena M. Ramos,et al.  Pressure Control for Leakage Minimisation in Water Distribution Systems Management , 2006 .

[20]  Giovanni Maria Sechi,et al.  Location and Calibration of Valves in Water Distribution Networks Using a Scatter-Search Meta-heuristic Approach , 2009 .

[21]  Aluizio F. R. Araújo,et al.  Improving NSGA-II with an adaptive mutation operator , 2009, GECCO '09.

[22]  Armando Di Nardo,et al.  Water Network Sectorization Based on Graph Theory and Energy Performance Indices , 2014 .

[23]  Chengchao Xu,et al.  Optimal Valve Control in Water‐Distribution Networks , 1990 .

[24]  Enrico Creaco,et al.  Multiobjective Optimization of Pipe Replacements and Control Valve Installations for Leakage Attenuation in Water Distribution Networks , 2015 .

[25]  El-Ghazali Talbi,et al.  A Taxonomy of Hybrid Metaheuristics , 2002, J. Heuristics.

[26]  Hossein M. V. Samani,et al.  GA-ILP Method for Optimization of Water Distribution Networks , 2011 .

[27]  Darian Raad,et al.  Robust multi-objective optimization for water distribution system design using a meta-metaheuristic , 2009, Int. Trans. Oper. Res..

[28]  Kalyanmoy Deb,et al.  A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II , 2002, IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput..

[29]  Mohammed Elgorani Abdelrhman Ali Knowledge-Based Optimization Model for Control Valve Locations in Water Distribution Networks , 2015 .

[30]  Salvatore Venticinque,et al.  An Automated Tool for Smart Water Network Partitioning , 2013, Water Resources Management.

[31]  Godfrey A. Walters,et al.  LEMMO: Hybridising Rule Induction and NSGAII for Multi-Objective Water Systems Design , 2005 .

[32]  Laetitia Vermeulen-Jourdan,et al.  Hybridising rule induction and multi-objective evolutionary search for optimising water distribution systems , 2004, Fourth International Conference on Hybrid Intelligent Systems (HIS'04).