Open-ended projects opened up — aspects of openness

One of the most important areas of competence for professional engineers is the ability to function well in project work, in particular they need to be able to efficiently solve open-ended problems in different collaborative settings. The development of this ability is however not prominent in engineering education despite numerous authors suggesting open-ended problems as a pedagogical tool to promote development of collaborative problem solving competence by including elements of group or project work in courses. In our own long experience of using open-ended problems in collaborative student projects, we have identified a lack of systematic progression in learning outcomes and skill development. We see this as a major obstacle for fully exploiting the potentials of using open-ended problems as an educational tool. We present a framework that provides a structured view of challenges related to openness that students can encounter in educational projects and that has an impact on the overall complexity of the project. We argue that there are different categories of openness to consider when designing educational settings based on open-ended projects. The categories addressed in this paper are: Character of the problems addressed. Character of the teams. Time constraints. Faculty involvement. External factors. Aspects of openness in the different categories are presented and related to professional engineering competencies. Furthermore, it is discussed how variations in project complexity can be accomplished by variations within the aspects and combinations of aspects. In particular, the framework addresses development and progression of professional competencies.

[1]  Paul M. Leidig,et al.  Resources for instructors of capstone courses in computing , 2001, ITiCSE-WGR '01.

[2]  Peter J. Knoke,et al.  Medium Size Project Model: Variations on a Theme , 1991, CSEE.

[3]  Oh Nam Kwon,et al.  Cultivating divergent thinking in mathematics through an open-ended approach , 2006 .

[4]  Klaus Bothe,et al.  Reverse engineering: the challenge of large-scale real-world educational projects , 2001, Proceedings 14th Conference on Software Engineering Education and Training. 'In search of a software engineering profession' (Cat. No.PR01059).

[5]  K. Patricia Cross,et al.  Collaborative Learning Techniques: A Handbook for College Faculty , 2004 .

[6]  Gerald C. Gannod,et al.  Dimensions for Categorizing Capstone Projects , 2009, 2009 22nd Conference on Software Engineering Education and Training.

[7]  Spencer P. Magleby,et al.  A Survey of Capstone Engineering Courses in North America , 1995 .

[8]  Johan Malmqvist,et al.  Rethinking Engineering Education - The CDIO Approach , 2007 .

[9]  Richard E. Clark,et al.  Why Minimal Guidance During Instruction Does Not Work: An Analysis of the Failure of Constructivist, Discovery, Problem-Based, Experiential, and Inquiry-Based Teaching , 2006 .

[10]  Elliot P. Douglas,et al.  Moving beyond formulas and fixations: solving open-ended engineering problems , 2012 .

[11]  Mats Daniels,et al.  Quality Assurance using International Curricula and Employer Feedback , 2015, ACE.

[12]  Jim Sibley,et al.  Getting Started With Team-Based Learning , 2014 .

[13]  Jennifer Nacht,et al.  University Science And Mathematics Education In Transition , 2016 .

[14]  Arnold Pears,et al.  Developing global teamwork skills: The Runestone project , 2010, IEEE EDUCON 2010 Conference.

[15]  DeSeCo Oecd Definition and Selection of Key Competencies-Executive Summary , 2005 .

[16]  Anette Kolmos,et al.  Problem-Based and Project-Based Learning , 2009 .

[17]  W. Marsden I and J , 2012 .

[18]  Debbie Richards,et al.  Designing Project-Based Courses with a Focus on Group Formation and Assessment , 2009, TOCE.

[19]  J. Pellegrino,et al.  Education for Life and Work: Developing Transferable Knowledge and Skills in the 21st Century , 2013 .

[20]  Sally Fincher,et al.  Computer Science Project Work , 2001 .

[21]  Moshe Y. Vardi,et al.  Globalization and offshoring of software , 2009 .

[22]  Analía Amandi,et al.  Personalised collaborative skills for student models , 2011, Interact. Learn. Environ..

[23]  Mikko Apiola,et al.  Creativity-Supporting Learning Environment---CSLE , 2012, TOCE.

[24]  Mary Shaw,et al.  Models for Undergraduate Project Courses in Software Engineering , 1991, CSEE.

[25]  Mats Daniels,et al.  A learning theory perspective on running open ended group projects (OEGPs) , 2008, ACE '08.

[26]  Ville Isomöttönen,et al.  Learning mechanisms in multidisciplinary teamwork with real customers and open-ended problems , 2015 .