Models of Relevant Cue Integration in Name Retrieval.

Abstract Semantic features have different levels of importance in indexing a target concept. The article proposes that semantic relevance, an algorithmically derived measure based on concept descriptions, may efficiently capture the relative importance of different semantic features. Three models of how semantic features are integrated in terms of relevance during name retrieval are presented. The models have been contrasted with empirical results from a naming-to-description task administered to three different groups of participants: young people, healthy elderly and semantically impaired Alzheimer patients. Predictions of the empirical results made by the models are used to provide a measure of identifiability or the extent to which the models can be distinguished from one another. In three studies we show that an additive-type rule is consistently superior to multiplicative rule and winner-take-all rule in predicting naming accuracy in a naming-to-description task. Finally, we investigated the implications of the integration rules for degraded semantic knowledge.

[1]  J. D. Smith,et al.  Prototypes in the Mist: The Early Epochs of Category Learning , 1998 .

[2]  Mark S. Seidenberg,et al.  Category-Specific Semantic Deficits in Focal and Widespread Brain Damage: A Computational Account , 1998, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[3]  G Salton,et al.  Developments in Automatic Text Retrieval , 1991, Science.

[4]  R. Nosofsky Attention, similarity, and the identification-categorization relationship. , 1986, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[5]  George S. Cree,et al.  Distinctive features hold a privileged status in the computation of word meaning: Implications for theories of semantic memory. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[6]  G. Humphreys,et al.  Hierarchies, similarity, and interactivity in object recognition: “Category-specific” neuropsychological deficits , 2001, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[7]  H. H. Clark The language-as-fixed-effect fallacy: A critique of language statistics in psychological research. , 1973 .

[8]  D. Massaro Speech Perception By Ear and Eye: A Paradigm for Psychological Inquiry , 1989 .

[9]  J. Kruschke,et al.  ALCOVE: an exemplar-based connectionist model of category learning. , 1992, Psychological review.

[10]  Matthew A. Lambon Ralph,et al.  Naming in semantic dementia—what matters? , 1998, Neuropsychologia.

[11]  Ian H. Witten,et al.  The zero-frequency problem: Estimating the probabilities of novel events in adaptive text compression , 1991, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[12]  Gerard Salton,et al.  Term-Weighting Approaches in Automatic Text Retrieval , 1988, Inf. Process. Manag..

[13]  Roger Ratcliff,et al.  Assessing model mimicry using the parametric bootstrap , 2004 .

[14]  Tim Smits,et al.  Fruits and vegetables categorized: An application of the generalized context model , 2002, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[15]  Gert Storms,et al.  Categorization of novel stimuli in well-known natural concepts: A case study , 2001, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[16]  Mark S. Seidenberg,et al.  On the nature and scope of featural representations of word meaning. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[17]  J. Rodd,et al.  Distinctiveness and correlation in conceptual structure: behavioral and computational studies. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[18]  G. Gainotti,et al.  Neuroanatomical correlates of category-specific semantic disorders: a critical survey. , 1995, Memory.

[19]  R. Shepard Stimulus and response generalization: A stochastic model relating generalization to distance in psychological space , 1957 .

[20]  Eleanor Rosch,et al.  Principles of Categorization , 1978 .

[21]  B B Murdock,et al.  TODAM2: a model for the storage and retrieval of item, associative, and serial-order information. , 1993, Psychological review.

[22]  Geoffrey E. Hinton,et al.  Lesioning an attractor network: investigations of acquired dyslexia , 1991 .

[23]  Edward E. Smith,et al.  Categories and concepts , 1984 .

[24]  W. Estes Models of Categorization and Category Learning , 1993 .

[25]  N. Anderson Foundations of information integration theory , 1981 .

[26]  M. L. Lambon Ralph,et al.  Prototypicality, distinctiveness, and intercorrelation: Analyses of the semantic attributes of living and nonliving concepts , 2001, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[27]  G. Sartori,et al.  Semantic relevance best predicts normal and abnormal name retrieval , 2005, Neuropsychologia.

[28]  M. Garrett,et al.  Representing the meanings of object and action words: The featural and unitary semantic space hypothesis , 2004, Cognitive Psychology.

[29]  Douglas L. Medin,et al.  Structural Principles in Categorization , 2019, Perception, Cognition, and Development.

[30]  Joseph P. Levy,et al.  The distinctiveness of form and function in category structure: A connectionist model , 1997 .

[31]  J. F. Marques Naming from definition: The role of feature type and feature distinctiveness , 2005, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[32]  Giuseppe Sartori,et al.  Feature type effects in semantic memory: An event related potentials study , 2005, Neuroscience Letters.

[33]  E. Rosch Cognitive Representations of Semantic Categories. , 1975 .

[34]  Ken McRae,et al.  Category - Specific semantic deficits , 2008 .

[35]  T. Landauer,et al.  A Solution to Plato's Problem: The Latent Semantic Analysis Theory of Acquisition, Induction, and Representation of Knowledge. , 1997 .

[36]  M. Ross Quillian,et al.  Retrieval time from semantic memory , 1969 .

[37]  O. G. Selfridge,et al.  Pandemonium: a paradigm for learning , 1988 .

[38]  N. Perrin,et al.  Varieties of perceptual independence. , 1986, Psychological review.

[39]  G. Sartori,et al.  An ERP study of low and high relevance semantic features , 2006, Brain Research Bulletin.

[40]  J. Hodges,et al.  Is semantic memory consistently impaired early in the course of Alzheimer's disease? Neuroanatomical and diagnostic implications , 1995, Neuropsychologia.

[41]  Mark H. Ashcraft,et al.  Property norms for typical and atypical items from 17 categories: A description and discussion , 1978 .

[42]  Giuseppe Sartori,et al.  Semantic relevance explains category effects in medial fusiform gyri , 2006, NeuroImage.

[43]  Gerard Salton,et al.  Automatic Text Processing: The Transformation, Analysis, and Retrieval of Information by Computer , 1989 .

[44]  M. D. O'Brien,et al.  Cerebral blood flow in dementia , 1986, Neurology.

[45]  E. Rosch,et al.  Cognition and Categorization , 1980 .

[46]  G. Sartori,et al.  Semantic Relevance and Semantic Disorders , 2004, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[47]  John R. Anderson,et al.  The Adaptive Nature of Human Categorization. , 1991 .

[48]  R. Nosofsky Attention and learning processes in the identification and categorization of integral stimuli. , 1987, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[49]  R. Nosofsky American Psychological Association, Inc. Choice, Similarity, and the Context Theory of Classification , 2022 .

[50]  D. Mann,et al.  A quantitative morphometric analysis of the neuronal and synaptic content of the frontal and temporal cortex in patients with Alzheimer's disease , 1987, Journal of the Neurological Sciences.

[51]  G. Gigerenzer,et al.  Probabilistic mental models: a Brunswikian theory of confidence. , 1991, Psychological review.

[52]  Lorella Lotto,et al.  Naming times and standardized norms for the italian PD/DPSS set of 266 pictures: Direct comparisons with American, English, French, and Spanish published databases , 2000, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[53]  Douglas L. Medin,et al.  Context theory of classification learning. , 1978 .

[54]  D. Bub,et al.  Semantic memory loss in dementia of Alzheimer's type. What do various measures measure? , 1990, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[55]  Kara D. Federmeier,et al.  Electrophysiology reveals semantic memory use in language comprehension , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[56]  D. Massaro,et al.  Models of integration given multiple sources of information. , 1990, Psychological review.

[57]  W. R. Garner,et al.  Perceptual independence: definitions, models, and experimental paradigms. , 1969, Psychological bulletin.

[58]  P. McCullagh,et al.  Generalized Linear Models , 1984 .

[59]  Michael M. Cohen,et al.  A comparison of learning models , 1995 .

[60]  M. Folstein,et al.  Clinical diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease , 1984, Neurology.

[61]  L. Barsalou Context-independent and context-dependent information in concepts , 1982, Memory & cognition.

[62]  Peter McLeod,et al.  Attractor dynamics in word recognition: converging evidence from errors by normal subjects, dyslexic patients and a connectionist model , 2000, Cognition.

[63]  James L. McClelland,et al.  A computational model of semantic memory impairment: modality specificity and emergent category specificity. , 1991, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[64]  R. Shepard,et al.  Toward a universal law of generalization for psychological science. , 1987, Science.

[65]  Emer M. E. Forde,et al.  Category specific recognition impairments: a review of important case studies and influential theories , 1999 .

[66]  A. Tversky Features of Similarity , 1977 .

[67]  Maria Caterina Silveri Interaction between vision and language in category-specific semantic impairment , 1998 .

[68]  W. Estes Array models for category learning , 1986, Cognitive Psychology.

[69]  S. Folstein,et al.  "Mini-mental state". A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. , 1975, Journal of psychiatric research.

[70]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Structure and deterioration of semantic memory: a neuropsychological and computational investigation. , 2004, Psychological review.

[71]  Exploring cognition : damaged brains and neural networks : readings in cognitive neuropsychology and connectionist modelling , 2000 .