Application of Nonaxisymmetric Endwall Contouring to Conventional and High-Lift Turbine Airfoils

Here, we report on the application of nonaxisymmetric endwall contouring to mitigate the endwall losses of one conventional and two high-lift low-pressure turbine airfoil designs. The design methodology presented combines a gradient-based optimization algorithm with a three-dimensional computational fluid dynamics (CFD) flow solver to systematically vary a free-form parameterization of the endwall. The ability of the CFD solver employed in this work to predict endwall loss modifications resulting from nonaxisymmetric contouring is demonstrated with previously published data. Based on the validated trend accuracy of the solver for predicting the effects of endwall contouring, the magnitude of predicted viscous losses forms the objective function for the endwall design methodology. This system has subsequently been employed to optimize contours for the conventional-lift Pack B and high-lift Pack D-F and Pack D-A low-pressure turbine airfoil designs. Comparisons between the predicted and measured loss benefits associated with the contouring for Pack D-F design are shown to be in reasonable agreement. Additionally, the predictions and data demonstrate that the Pack D-F endwall contour is effective at reducing losses primarily associated with the passage vortex. However, some deficiencies in predictive capabilities demonstrated here highlight the need for a better understanding of the physics of endwall loss-generation and improved predictive capabilities.

[1]  John P. Clark,et al.  Predicting Transition in Turbomachinery—Part II: Model Validation and Benchmarking , 2007 .

[2]  R. Simpson,et al.  Time-depeiident and time-averaged turbulence structure near the nose of a wing-body junction , 1990, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[3]  Ralph J. Volino,et al.  Secondary Flow Measurements in a Turbine Passage With Endwall Flow Modification , 2000 .

[4]  Om P. Sharma,et al.  Predictions of Endwall Losses and Secondary Flows in Axial Flow Turbine Cascades , 1987 .

[5]  N. Ron-Ho,et al.  A Multiple-Grid Scheme for Solving the Euler Equations , 1982 .

[6]  C. H. Sieverding,et al.  Recent Progress in the Understanding of Basic Aspects of Secondary Flows in Turbine Blade Passages , 1985 .

[7]  L. Fottner,et al.  The Influence of Load Distribution on Secondary Flow in Straight Turbine Cascades , 1993 .

[8]  T. J. Praisner,et al.  The Dynamics of the Horseshoe Vortex and Associated Endwall Heat Transfer—Part I: Temporal Behavior , 2006 .

[9]  John P. Clark,et al.  Predicting Transition in Turbomachinery—Part I: A Review and New Model Development , 2007 .

[10]  D. Wilcox Turbulence modeling for CFD , 1993 .

[11]  David Gregory-Smith,et al.  Nonaxisymmetric Turbine End Wall Design: Part II—Experimental Validation , 2000 .

[12]  R. Ni A multiple grid scheme for solving the Euler equations , 1981 .

[13]  David Gregory-Smith,et al.  Nonaxisymmetric Turbine End Wall Design: Part I— Three-Dimensional Linear Design System , 2000 .