Picture-digit differences in processing clock times.

Clock times displayed as digits and as clockfaces were used as stimuli in a series of experiments that tested the hypothesis that a common numerical code was used for processing clock times. Whether the task involved reading times or making comparative judgments of early/late or same/different, digits were always processed faster than clockfaces . The size of the format effect varied, however, with the processing demands of the task and with times at specific locations on the clockface . Also, automatic processing of times presented as clockfaces interfered with comparative judgments made with digits, but digital distractors were not found to interfere with judgments made to times as clockfaces . The findings are discussed within the context of picture-word differences in rate of access to articulatory and semantic codes. Conclusions are also made regarding the relative efficiency of displaying times digitally and in the form of clockfaces .

[1]  Denise C. Park,et al.  Processing of visually presented clock times. , 1980, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[2]  S. Lupker,et al.  Can automatic picture processing influence word judgments? , 1982, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[3]  Harry L. Chiesi,et al.  Picture-word differences in decision latency: An analysis of single and dual memory models , 1977, Memory & cognition.

[4]  A. Paivio Perceptual comparisons through the mind’s eye , 1975, Memory & cognition.

[5]  M. Potter,et al.  Time to understand pictures and words , 1975, Nature.

[6]  M. C. Smith,et al.  Tracing the time course of picture--word processing. , 1980, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[7]  A. Paivio,et al.  Comparisons of mental clocks. , 1978, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.