CAN FINAL EXAMINATIONS AMPLIFY STUDENTS’ MISCONCEPTIONS IN CHEMISTRY?

Many researches have been conducted in order to examine students’ misconceptions in chemistry. The present study focuses on students' difficulties regarding the concepts chemical structure and bonding, which are essential for understanding many concepts and topics in chemistry. Research conducted around the world has clearly shown that the concepts associated with chemical structure and bonding, such as molecules, ions, hydrogen bonds, and giant lattices are abstract and are highly based on the sub-microscopic nature of chemistry. In Israel, the central developed Matriculation Examination in chemistry is one of the main sources for information on misconceptions of students. The analyses of the Matriculation Examinations in chemistry, over a period of more than 12 years, revealed each year that students have a fundamental misunderstanding and difficulties regarding these concepts. No doubt, the teaching and learning of these concepts is a serious and continuous problem. In this study we present several factors leading to these misconceptions. More specifically, we focus on how the structure and content of the National Matriculation Examinations conducted in Israel influence chemistry teaching and learning. We think that this type of assessment can be a major factor in the development of students’ learning difficulties and alternative conceptions. [Chem. Educ. Res. Pract.: 2004, 5, 301-325]

[1]  W. Robinson,et al.  Chemistry Problem-Solving: Symbol, Macro, Micro, and Process Aspects , 2003 .

[2]  Keith S. Taber,et al.  The Mismatch between Assumed Prior Knowledge and the Learner's Conceptions: A typology of learning impediments , 2001 .

[3]  Keith S. Taber,et al.  BUILDING THE STRUCTURAL CONCEPTS OF CHEMISTRY: SOME CONSIDERATIONS FROM EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH , 2001 .

[4]  K. Taber,et al.  LEARNERS’ EXPLANATIONS FOR CHEMICAL PHENOMENA , 2000 .

[5]  Allan G. Harrison,et al.  Learning about atoms, molecules, and chemical bonds: A case study of multiple-model use in grade 11 chemistry , 2000 .

[6]  David F. Treagust,et al.  Modelling in Science Lessons: Are There Better Ways to Learn With Models? , 1998 .

[7]  Keith S. Taber,et al.  An alternative conceptual framework from chemistry education , 1998 .

[8]  Georgios Tsaparlis,et al.  Atomic and Molecular Structure in Chemical Education: A Critical Analysis from Various Perspectives of Science Education. , 1997 .

[9]  R. Gillespie.  The Great Ideas of Chemistry , 1997 .

[10]  David F. Treagust,et al.  Secondary students' mental models of atoms and molecules: Implications for teaching chemistry , 1996 .

[11]  Stuart A. Rosenfeld,et al.  Metaphorical Models in Chemistry , 1995 .

[12]  Keith S. Taber,et al.  Development of Student Understanding: a case study of stability and lability in cognitive structure , 1995 .

[13]  Alan K. Griffiths,et al.  Grade-12 Students' Misconceptions Relating to Fundamental Characteristics of Atoms and Molecules. , 1992 .

[14]  A. Johnstone.  Why is science difficult to learn? Things are seldom what they seem , 1991 .

[15]  Jean Lythcott,et al.  Problem solving and requisite knowledge of chemistry , 1990 .

[16]  Carolyn S. Carter,et al.  What makes chemistry difficult? Alternate perceptions , 1989 .

[17]  L. Shulman.  Those Who Understand: Knowledge Growth in Teaching , 1986 .

[18]  Robert K. Merton,et al.  The Focused Interview , 1946, American Journal of Sociology.

[19]  J. Gilbert.  Chemical education: towards research-based practice , 2003 .

[20]  Yehudit Judy Dori,et al.  From Nationwide Standardized Testing to School-Based Alternative Embedded Assessment in Israel: Students' Performance in the Matriculation 2000 Project , 2003 .

[21]  S. Erduran.  Examining the Mismatch between Pupil and Teacher Knowledge in Acid-Base Chemistry. , 2003 .

[22]  Rosária Justi,et al.  Models and Modelling in Chemical Education , 2002 .

[23]  George M. Bodner,et al.  Mental Models : The Role of Representations in Problem Solving in Chemistry PROCEEDINGS , 2002 .

[24]  Clive Sutton,et al.  Beliefs about science and beliefs about language , 1996 .

[25]  David F. Treagust,et al.  Improving teaching and learning in science and mathematics , 1996 .

[26]  S. Gilbert.  Model building and a definition of science , 1991 .

[27]  Bat-Sheva Eylon,et al.  Is an atom of copper malleable , 1986 .

[28]  R. Driver,et al.  Pupils and Paradigms: a Review of Literature Related to Concept Development in Adolescent Science Students , 1978 .

[29]  T. S. Kendler.  Concept formation. , 1961, Annual review of psychology.