Biologic hernia implants in experimental intraperitoneal onlay mesh plasty repair: the impact of proprietary collagen processing methods and fibrin sealant application on tissue integration

BackgroundBiologic implants have been recommended for reinforcement in routine and challenging hernia repair. However, experimental and clinical studies have reported adverse effects (e.g., slow implant integration and pronounced foreign body reaction). To evaluate the impact of different material processing methods (cross-linking vs. non-cross-linking of collagen) and implant design, four different biologic hernia implants were compared directly in experimental intraperitoneal onlay mesh plasty (IPOM). Tissue integration, shrinkage, and foreign body reaction were primary outcome parameters.MethodsIn this study, 48 Sprague–Dawley rats were randomized to four treatment groups. Open IPOM repair was performed. One peritoneal defect per animal was covered with 2 × 2 cm patches of cross-linked or non-cross-linked implants including CollaMend (n = 12), Peripatch (n = 12), Surgisis (n = 12), and Tutomesh (n = 12). In half of the animals, fibrin sealant was applied for additional fixation and to cover sutures. The observation period was 60 days. The primary outcome parameters were implant integration, shrinkage, and foreign body reaction. Macroscopic and histologic assessments were performed.ResultsThe integration of implants was insufficient in all the groups. The implants could be detached easily from the underlying tissue, and the penetration of fibroblasts and vessels was limited to the perforations. Foreign body reaction was pronounced with CollaMend and Surgisis, leading to persistent granulomatous inflammation. Shrinkage was excessive with Surgisis, whereas Tutomesh and Peripatch yielded sufficient anti-adhesion and elicited no foreign body reaction.ConclusionAt 2 months, cross-linked and non-cross-linked biologic hernia implants were poorly integrated. Cross-linking led to a more pronounced foreign body reaction. Less inflammatory response may reduce local complications, but did not enhance implant integration in this study.

[1]  Hui Xu,et al.  Host response to implanted porcine-derived biologic materials in a primate model of abdominal wall repair. , 2008, Tissue engineering. Part A.

[2]  F. Agresta,et al.  Transabdominal laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: is there a place for biological mesh? , 2008, Hernia.

[3]  J. Jeekel,et al.  Evaluation of new prosthetic meshes for ventral hernia repair , 2006, Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques.

[4]  T. Benesch,et al.  A comparison of a bovine albumin/glutaraldehyde glue versus fibrin sealant for hernia mesh fixation in experimental onlay and IPOM repair in rats , 2010, Surgical Endoscopy.

[5]  M. Rosen Article Commentary: Biologic Mesh for Abdominal Wall Reconstruction: A Critical Appraisal , 2010, The American surgeon.

[6]  A. M. Altizer,et al.  Are Biologic Grafts Effective for Hernia Repair? , 2009, Surgical innovation.

[7]  J. Deprest,et al.  Biomechanical findings in rats undergoing fascial reconstruction with graft materials suggested as an alternative to polypropylene , 2010, Neurourology and urodynamics.

[8]  S. Genari,et al.  Effects of different sterilization methods on the morphology, mechanical properties, and cytotoxicity of chitosan membranes used as wound dressings. , 2004, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials.

[9]  W. Long,et al.  Synthetic and Biological Mesh in Component Separation: A 10-Year Single Institution Review , 2010, Annals of plastic surgery.

[10]  A. Cappellani,et al.  Use of biological meshes for abdominal wall reconstruction in highly contaminated fields. , 2010, World journal of gastroenterology.

[11]  L. Ansaloni,et al.  Lichtenstein repair of inguinal hernia with Surgisis inguinal hernia matrix soft-tissue graft in immunodepressed patients , 2005, Hernia.

[12]  Stefano Gagliardi,et al.  Immune Response to Small Intestinal Submucosa (Surgisis) Implant in Humans: Preliminary Observations , 2007, Journal of investigative surgery : the official journal of the Academy of Surgical Research.

[13]  R. Schwab,et al.  Fibrin sealant (Tissucol) enhances tissue integration of condensed polytetrafluoroethylene meshes and reduces early adhesion formation in experimental intraabdominal peritoneal onlay mesh repair. , 2008, The Journal of surgical research.

[14]  M. van Griensven,et al.  Adverse effects associated with the use of porcine cross-linked collagen implants in an experimental model of incisional hernia repair. , 2008, The Journal of surgical research.

[15]  H. Redl,et al.  Small intestine submucosa (SIS) implants in experimental IPOM repair. , 2010, The Journal of surgical research.

[16]  B. Trujillo-Hernández,et al.  Reduction of Peritoneal Adhesion to Polypropylene Mesh with the Application of Fibrin Glue , 2008, Acta chirurgica Belgica.

[17]  D. Thoman,et al.  Early Results of the Use of Acellular Dermal Allograft in Type III Paraesophageal Hernia Repair , 2006, JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons.

[18]  H. Lippert,et al.  Mesh fixation with fibrin glue (Tissucol/Tisseel®) in hernia repair dependent on the mesh structure—is there an optimum fibrin–mesh combination?—Investigations on a biomechanical model , 2010, Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery.

[19]  A. Keshishian,et al.  Ventral herniorrhaphy: experience with two different biosynthetic mesh materials, Surgisis and Alloderm , 2006, Hernia.

[20]  S. Horgan,et al.  Short-term outcomes with small intestinal submucosa for ventral abdominal hernia. , 2005, Archives of surgery.

[21]  M. Holzman,et al.  Physiologic properties of small intestine submucosa1 , 2005 .

[22]  A. Rueter,et al.  Elimination of toxicity from polyvinyl trays after sterilization with ethylene oxide. , 1969, Applied microbiology.

[23]  Stephen F Badylak,et al.  Quantification of DNA in biologic scaffold materials. , 2009, The Journal of surgical research.

[24]  M. Holzman,et al.  Physiologic properties of small intestine submucosa. , 2005, The Journal of surgical research.

[25]  Patricia Brown Abdominal wall reconstruction using biological tissue grafts. , 2009, AORN journal.