The electrophysiological effect of working memory load on involuntary attention in an auditory–visual distraction paradigm: an ERP study

Event-related brain potentials (ERPs) were used to examine the electrophysiological effect of working memory (WM) load on involuntary attention caused by a task-irrelevant sound in an auditory–visual distraction paradigm. The different WM loads were manipulated by requiring subjects to remember the order of either three digits (low-load condition) or seven digits (high-load condition), and the irrelevant auditory stimuli consisted of repetitive standard sounds (80%) and environmental novel sounds (20%). We found that the difference waves (novel-minus-standard) showed significant MMN and Novelty-P3 components in the two WM load conditions. The amplitude of MMN increased with increasing the WM load, which indicated a more engaged change detection process under high-load condition. Then, the amplitude of Novelty-P3 was attenuated under high-load condition, which indicated a much reduced involuntary orienting of attention to novel sounds when increasing the WM load. These results indicated the top–down control of involuntary attention might be mainly active at the early change detection stage and the control of the later involuntary orienting of attention might be passive.

[1]  N. Lavie,et al.  The role of working memory in attentional capture , 2005, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[2]  Jia-Hong Gao,et al.  More workload on the central executive of working memory, less attention capture by novel visual distractors: evidence from an fMRI study , 2004, NeuroImage.

[3]  Carles Escera,et al.  When Loading Working Memory Reduces Distraction: Behavioral and Electrophysiological Evidence from an Auditory-Visual Distraction Paradigm , 2008, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[4]  I. Winkler,et al.  Involuntary Attention and Distractibility as Evaluated with Event-Related Brain Potentials , 2000, Audiology and Neurotology.

[5]  E. Viding,et al.  Load theory of selective attention and cognitive control. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[6]  C. Escera,et al.  Role of Mismatch Negativity and Novelty-P3 in Involuntary Auditory Attention , 2007 .

[7]  R. Ilmoniemi,et al.  Processing of novel sounds and frequency changes in the human auditory cortex: magnetoencephalographic recordings. , 1998, Psychophysiology.

[8]  R. Näätänen The role of attention in auditory information processing as revealed by event-related potentials and other brain measures of cognitive function , 1990, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[9]  Erich Schrger,et al.  A Neural Mechanism for Involuntary Attention Shifts to Changes in Auditory Stimulation , 1996, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[10]  M. Chun,et al.  Concurrent working memory load can facilitate selective attention: evidence for specialized load. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[11]  I. Winkler,et al.  Top-down control over involuntary attention switching in the auditory modality , 2003, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[12]  N. Cowan,et al.  Visual working memory depends on attentional filtering , 2006, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[13]  E. Schröger,et al.  Perceptual and cognitive task difficulty has differential effects on auditory distraction , 2007, Brain Research.

[14]  A. Muller-Gass,et al.  The effect of visual task difficulty and attentional direction on the detection of acoustic change as indexed by the Mismatch Negativity , 2006, Brain Research.

[15]  J. Fuster The Prefrontal Cortex—An Update Time Is of the Essence , 2001, Neuron.

[16]  E. Schröger,et al.  A comparison of auditory and visual distraction effects: behavioral and event-related indices. , 2001, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[17]  T Fernández,et al.  Primary task demands modulate P3a amplitude. , 2000, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[18]  D. Friedman,et al.  The novelty P3: an event-related brain potential (ERP) sign of the brain's evaluation of novelty , 2001, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[19]  Erich Schröger,et al.  Working memory controls involuntary attention switching: evidence from an auditory distraction paradigm , 2003, The European journal of neuroscience.

[20]  E. Schröger,et al.  Bottom-up influences on working memory: behavioral and electrophysiological distraction varies with distractor strength. , 2004, Experimental psychology.

[21]  R. Knight,et al.  Neural Mechanisms of Involuntary Attention to Acoustic Novelty and Change , 1998, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[22]  N. Lavie Distracted and confused?: Selective attention under load , 2005, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[23]  J. C. Johnston,et al.  Attention and performance. , 2001, Annual review of psychology.

[24]  B. Postle Working memory as an emergent property of the mind and brain , 2006, Neuroscience.

[25]  E. Vogel,et al.  Interactions between attention and working memory , 2006, Neuroscience.

[26]  J. Duncan An adaptive coding model of neural function in prefrontal cortex , 2001 .