Direct Comparison of Three Commercially Available Devices for Voice Ambulatory Monitoring and Biofeedback

Purpose: To provide a direct comparison of three commercially available devices for voice ambulatory monitoring and biofeedback to assist voice clinicians and researchers in choosing the device that best meets their needs. Methods: The Ambulatory Phonation Monitor (APM), VocaLog, and VoxLog were descriptively compared regarding cost, availability, physical characteristics, and operational features; and quantitatively compared regarding measures of loudness (dB sound pressure level [SPL]), pitch (fundamental frequency – F0), and phonation time. The quantitative comparison used simultaneous registrations acquired during a 90-minute lecture which also included a Smartphone-based system designed to capture the raw voice signal as a reference. Results: Differences regarding cost, physical characteristics, and operational features could influence device choice. All three devices register SPL and phonation time, and also biofeedback based on SPL. Furthermore, the APM and VoxLog provide monitoring and biofeedback...

[1]  George R. Wodicka,et al.  Air-Borne and Tissue-Borne Sensitivities of Bioacoustic Sensors Used on the Skin Surface , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[2]  Timothy D. Lee,et al.  Motor Control and Learning: A Behavioral Emphasis , 1982 .

[3]  Samuel Sonning Improving the system acceptibility of the voice accumulator Voxlog , 2013 .

[4]  Robert E. Hillman,et al.  Mobile Voice Health Monitoring Using a Wearable Accelerometer Sensor and a Smartphone Platform , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[5]  Ingo R Titze,et al.  Estimation of sound pressure levels of voiced speech from skin vibration of the neck. , 2005, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[6]  Robert E Hillman,et al.  Ambulatory Monitoring of Disordered Voices , 2006, The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology.

[7]  Marzyeh Ghassemi,et al.  Learning to Detect Vocal Hyperfunction From Ambulatory Neck-Surface Acceleration Features: Initial Results for Vocal Fold Nodules , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[8]  D. C. Shapiro,et al.  Information Feedback for Skill Acquisition: Instantaneous Knowledge of Results Degrades Learning , 1990 .

[9]  Maria Södersten,et al.  Effects of tactile biofeedback by a portable voice accumulator on voice sound level in speakers with Parkinson's disease. , 2013, Journal of voice : official journal of the Voice Foundation.

[10]  Robert E Hillman,et al.  Development and testing of a portable vocal accumulator. , 2003, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[11]  J. Švec,et al.  Vocal dose measures: quantifying accumulated vibration exposure in vocal fold tissues. , 2003, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[12]  R. Schmidt,et al.  Motor control and learning: A behavioral emphasis, 4th ed. , 2005 .

[13]  J. Perkell,et al.  Objective assessment of vocal hyperfunction: an experimental framework and initial results. , 1989, Journal of speech and hearing research.