Are repeatedly victimized households different?

Much recent victimization research has concentrated on predicting who will be victimized, with relatively little concern for the number of events suffered. This study turns to the latter issue by focusing attention on the prediction of repeat victimization. A statistical methodology is employed which allows for the explicit recognition that an initial victimization must occur prior to any repeat event. When applied to property crime information from the 1984 British Crime Survey, we find little evidence that repeat victims have distinctive characteristics compared with single victims. Nevertheless, households with characteristics which protect from victimization, in the sense of giving rise to a low initial risk, have this protection reduced for a subsequent event. Moreover, comparing two households with different risk characteristics, their repeat victimization probabilities are more similar than were those for the initial occurrence.

[1]  Michael R. Gottfredson,et al.  Victims of Personal Crime: An Empirical Foundation for a Theory of Personal Victimization , 1977 .

[2]  Leslie W. Kennedy,et al.  ROUTINE ACTIVITIES AND CRIME: AN ANALYSIS OF VICTIMIZATION IN CANADA * , 1990 .

[3]  Robert J. Sampson,et al.  Violent victimization and offending: Individual-, situational-, and community-level risk factors. , 1994 .

[4]  G. King,et al.  Unifying Political Methodology: The Likelihood Theory of Statistical Inference , 1989 .

[5]  Alan Trickett,et al.  Property Crime Victimisation: The Roles of Individual and Area Influences , 1995 .

[6]  James F. Nelson Multiple Victimization in American Cities: A Statistical Analysis of Rare Events , 1980, American Journal of Sociology.

[7]  David P. Farrington,et al.  THE ONSET AND PERSISTENCE OF OFFENDING , 1992 .

[8]  Kenneth C. Land,et al.  MACRO‐MICRO INTEGRATION IN THE STUDY OF VICTIMIZATION: A HIERARCHICAL LOGISTIC MODEL ANALYSIS ACROSS SEATTLE NEIGHBORHOODS* , 1994 .

[9]  K. Pease,et al.  WHAT IS DIFFERENT ABOUT HIGH CRIME AREAS , 1992 .

[10]  Richard F. Sparks,et al.  Multiple Victimization: Evidence, Theory, and Future Research , 1981 .

[11]  G. Jarjoura,et al.  Household Characteristics, Neighborhood Composition and Victimization Risk , 1989 .

[12]  Ken Pease,et al.  Once bitten, twice bitten: repeat victimisation and its implications for crime prevention , 1993 .

[13]  J. S. Long,et al.  Social Differentiation in Criminal Victimization: A Test of Routine Activities/Lifestyle Theories , 1987 .

[14]  Peter Schmidt,et al.  On the Cost of Partial Observability in the Bivariate Probit Model , 1985 .

[15]  P. Pashardes,et al.  Constructing the true cost of living index from the Engel curves of the PIGLOG model , 1989 .

[16]  Robert J. Sampson,et al.  Linking the micro- and macro-level dimensions of lifestyle-routine activity and opportunity models of predatory victimization , 1987 .

[17]  Terance D. Miethe,et al.  Understanding Theories of Criminal Victimization , 1993, Crime and Justice.

[18]  M. Maxfield Household composition, routine activity, and victimization: A comparative analysis , 1987 .

[19]  A. Cameron,et al.  Econometric models based on count data. Comparisons and applications of some estimators and tests , 1986 .

[20]  Graham Farrell,et al.  Multiple Victimisation: Its Extent and Significance , 1992 .

[21]  Alan Trickett,et al.  Area characteristics and regional variates as determinants of area property crime levels , 1992 .

[22]  Janet L. Lauritsen,et al.  Repeat victimization among adolescents and young adults , 1995 .

[23]  Andrew M. Jones A double‐hurdle model of cigarette consumption , 1989 .

[24]  Ken Pease,et al.  A VICTIM IS A VICTIM IS A VICTIM?Chronic Victimization in Four Sweeps of the British Crime Survey , 1995 .

[25]  Michael R. Gottfredson Victims of crime: The dimensions of risk , 1984 .

[26]  Daniel S. Nagin,et al.  THE STABILITY OF CRIMINAL POTENTIAL FROM CHILDHOOD TO ADULTHOOD , 1992 .