Electrification Potential Factor: Energy-Based Value Proposition Analysis of Plug-In Hybrid Electric Vehicles

Automotive electrification in the past decade was accompanied by infrastructural changes in the electric power industry. The dual fuel (gasoline and electricity) and dual operation (vehicle to grid (V2G) and grid to vehicle) modes of plug-in hybrid electric vehicles (PHEVs) make them attractive to the automotive and the electric power industries. The value proposition of PHEVs from consumer and automotive perspectives depends on a number of key indicators, such as fuel economy, emissions, battery lifetime, and incremental premium over a hybrid electric (HEV) or a conventional vehicle (CV). In addition, the value proposition of a PHEV from a utility perspective can diverge or even conflict with the consumer or automotive industry perspective. The traditional distance-based utility factor (UF) is primarily used to estimate the vehicle miles that are electrifiable. In this paper, a novel energy-based electrification potential factor (EPF) is proposed to differentiate between travel miles that are electrified and electrifiable. The EPF also acts as a coupling factor that can be also used to assess the overall benefits and impacts of PHEVs from consumer, automotive industry, and utility perspectives. The EPF is developed using existing transportation survey data and detailed simulations using the Powertrain System Analysis Toolkit (PSAT). For different driving profiles and control strategies (charge sustaining, charge depleting, blended, and all electric), the tradeoffs between driving cost and battery lifetime are analyzed. Specific battery lifetime targets are set, and a baseline HEV is used to compare the driving cost savings of the PHEV before determining the EPF. The viability and usefulness of the proposed EPF is demonstrated through comprehensive vehicular simulations and tradeoff analyses.

[1]  Jeremy J. Michalek,et al.  Optimal Plug-In Hybrid Vehicle Design and Allocation for Minimum Life Cycle Cost, Petroleum Consumption and Greenhouse Gas Emissions , 2010 .

[2]  Ali Emadi,et al.  Advanced Integrated Bidirectional AC/DC and DC/DC Converter for Plug-In Hybrid Electric Vehicles , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology.

[3]  S. Chowdhury,et al.  Power electronic interfaces , 2009 .

[4]  Willett Kempton,et al.  Vehicle-to-grid power fundamentals: Calculating capacity and net revenue , 2005 .

[5]  Richard Barney Carlson,et al.  Deriving in-use PHEV fuel economy predictions from standardized test cycle results , 2009, 2009 IEEE Vehicle Power and Propulsion Conference.

[6]  Stanton W. Hadley,et al.  Potential Impacts of Plug-in Hybrid Electric Vehicles on Regional Power Generation , 2009 .

[7]  Willett Kempton,et al.  Vehicle-to-grid power implementation: From stabilizing the grid to supporting large-scale renewable energy , 2005 .

[8]  Jeremy J. Michalek,et al.  Optimal Plug-In Hybrid Electric Vehicle Design and Allocation for Minimum Life Cycle Cost, Petroleum Consumption, and Greenhouse Gas Emissions , 2010 .

[9]  Tony Markel,et al.  Cost-Benefit Analysis of Plug-In Hybrid Electric Vehicle Technology , 2007 .

[10]  Thomas H. Bradley,et al.  Analysis of plug-in hybrid electric vehicle utility factors , 2010 .

[11]  Ramteen Sioshansi,et al.  The Value of Plug-In Hybrid Electric Vehicles as Grid Resources , 2010 .

[12]  Zoran Filipi,et al.  Characterizing naturalistic driving patterns for Plug-in Hybrid Electric Vehicle analysis , 2009, 2009 IEEE Vehicle Power and Propulsion Conference.

[13]  D. B. Elliott,et al.  Economic Assessment And Impacts Assessment Of Plug-In Hybrid Vehicles On Electric Utilities And Regional U.S. Power Grids , 2007 .

[14]  Alireza Khaligh,et al.  Deterministic Scheduling of a Fleet of Plug-In Hybrid Vehicles for Distributed Generation , 2011 .

[15]  A. Khaligh,et al.  Power electronics intensive solutions for advanced electric, hybrid electric, and fuel cell vehicular power systems , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics.