The Evolution of Web-based Medical Information on Sore Throat: a Longitudinal Study

Background The content of a page can change and is likely to change over time; this is one of the useful qualities of the Web, but also a dangerous one. Objective To monitor the evolution of Web page contents on sore throat over a 3 year period. Methods Two medical doctors independently evaluated 34 Web pages on sore throat. Pages were found using a metasearch engine. The evaluation factors were: the adherence of medical contents to a gold standard (American Academy of Pediatrics recommendations) composed of 5 subfactors (epidemiological, clinical, complications, diagnosis, and therapy); the completeness of the contents in terms of considered/missed factors of the gold standard; references to medical literature; and a specified last update of the page. During the observation period these sites were revisited twice, after 28 and 39 months, to examine any changes therein since the first visit. Results The degree of adherence to the gold standard did not significantly change. Variations (both positive and negative) were recorded solely with regard to the update and references factors as well as with regard to the availability of the pages over time (18% disappeared during the observation period). Conclusions In 3 years medical contents have not changed significantly and despite the contemporary epochal Internet revolution (in terms of, eg, technology, graphics, and access) and the increase in the number of sites dealing with the issue of sore throat, there has been no corresponding qualitative increase in the contents of the pages monitored.

[1]  V P Abbott,et al.  Web page quality: can we measure it and what do we find? A report of exploratory findings. , 2000, Journal of public health medicine.

[2]  P Impicciatore,et al.  Parents on the Web: Risks for Quality Management of Cough in Children , 2000, Pediatrics.

[3]  Emma Irvin,et al.  Surfing for Back Pain Patients: The Nature and Quality of Back Pain Information on the Internet , 2001, Spine.

[4]  G Eysenbach,et al.  Labeling and Filtering of Medical Information on the Internet , 1999, Methods of Information in Medicine.

[5]  M. Winker,et al.  Guidelines for medical and health information sites on the internet: principles governing AMA web sites. American Medical Association. , 2000, JAMA.

[6]  A D'Atri,et al.  Accessing Information on Medical/Health Web Sites by Italian Families: a Pilot Study , 2000, Clinical pediatrics.

[7]  P. Impicciatore,et al.  Reliability of health information for the public on the world wide web: systematic survey of advice on managing fever in children at home , 1997, BMJ.

[8]  G D Lundberg,et al.  Assessing, controlling, and assuring the quality of medical information on the Internet: Caveant lector et viewor--Let the reader and viewer beware. , 1997, JAMA.

[9]  H. J. Mcclung,et al.  The Internet as a source for current patient information. , 1998, Pediatrics.

[10]  Nicolas P Terry,et al.  Rating the Raters: Legal Exposure of Trustmark Authorities in the Context of Consumer Health Informatics , 2000, Journal of medical Internet research.

[11]  R. Kravitz,et al.  Health information on the Internet: accessibility, quality, and readability in English and Spanish. , 2001, JAMA.

[12]  Maurizio Bonati,et al.  Follow up of quality of public oriented health information on the world wide web: systematic re-evaluation , 2002, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[13]  H. Christensen,et al.  Quality of web based information on treatment of depression: cross sectional survey , 2000, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[14]  G. Eysenbach Infodemiology: The epidemiology of (mis)information. , 2002, The American journal of medicine.

[15]  J. Powell,et al.  Empirical studies assessing the quality of health information for consumers on the world wide web: a systematic review. , 2002, JAMA.