Serial assessment of biomarkers and the risk of stroke or systemic embolism and bleeding in patients with atrial fibrillation in the ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 trial.

AIMS We investigated whether patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) demonstrate detectable changes in biomarkers including high-sensitivity troponin T (hsTnT), N-terminal B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), and growth differentiation factor-15 (GDF-15) over 12 months and whether such changes from baseline to 12 months are associated with the subsequent risk of stroke or systemic embolic events (S/SEE) and bleeding. METHODS AND RESULTS ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 was a randomized trial of the oral factor Xa inhibitor edoxaban in patients with AF and a CHADS2 score of ≥2. We performed a nested prospective biomarker study in 6308 patients, analysing hsTnT, NT-proBNP, and GDF-15 at baseline and 12 months. hsTnT was dynamic in 46.9% (≥2 ng/L change), NT-proBNP in 51.9% (≥200 pg/mL change), GDF-15 in 45.6% (≥300 pg/mL change) during 12 months. In a Cox regression model, upward changes in log2-transformed hsTnT and NT-proBNP were associated with increased risk of S/SEE [adjusted hazard ratio (adj-HR) 1.74; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.36-2.23 and adj-HR 1.27; 95% CI 1.07-1.50, respectively] and log2-transformed GDF-15 with bleeding (adj-HR 1.40; 95% CI 1.02-1.92). Reassessment of ABC-stroke (age, prior stroke/transient ischaemic attack, hsTnT, and NT-proBNP) and ABC-bleeding (age, prior bleeding, haemoglobin, hsTnT, and GDF-15) risk scores at 12 months accurately reclassified a significant proportion of patients compared with their baseline risk [net reclassification improvement (NRI) 0.50; 95% CI 0.36-0.65; NRI 0.42; 95% CI 0.33-0.51, respectively]. CONCLUSION Serial assessment of hsTnT, NT-proBNP, and GDF-15 revealed that a substantial proportion of patients with AF had dynamic values. Greater increases in these biomarkers measured over 1 year are associated with important clinical outcomes in anticoagulated patients with AF.

[1]  T. Omland,et al.  Growth Differentiation Factor 15 Provides Prognostic Information Superior to Established Cardiovascular and Inflammatory Biomarkers in Unselected Patients Hospitalized With COVID-19 , 2020, Circulation.

[2]  G. Lip,et al.  Low-Dose Edoxaban in Very Elderly Patients with Atrial Fibrillation. , 2020, The New England journal of medicine.

[3]  Jeroen J. Bax,et al.  2020 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). , 2020, European heart journal.

[4]  J. Rivera‐Caravaca,et al.  Predicting Adverse Events beyond Stroke and Bleeding with the ABC-Stroke and ABC-Bleeding Scores in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation: The Murcia AF Project , 2020, Thrombosis and Haemostasis.

[5]  E. Antman,et al.  Performance of the ABC Scores for Assessing the Risk of Stroke or Systemic Embolism and Bleeding in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation in ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 , 2019, Circulation.

[6]  Tzeng-Ji Chen,et al.  Relationship of Aging and Incident Comorbidities to Stroke Risk in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation. , 2018, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[7]  G. Lip,et al.  Long-term bleeding risk prediction in ‘real world’ patients with atrial fibrillation: Comparison of the HAS-BLED and ABC-Bleeding risk scores , 2017, Thrombosis and Haemostasis.

[8]  B. Gersh,et al.  Repeated Measurements of Cardiac Biomarkers in Atrial Fibrillation and Validation of the ABC Stroke Score Over Time , 2017, Journal of the American Heart Association.

[9]  V. Cavalli,et al.  GDF15 is elevated in mice following retinal ganglion cell death and in glaucoma patients. , 2017, JCI insight.

[10]  E. Antman,et al.  Cardiovascular Biomarker Score and Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: A Subanalysis of the ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 Randomized Clinical Trial. , 2016, JAMA cardiology.

[11]  S. Yusuf,et al.  The novel biomarker-based ABC (age, biomarkers, clinical history)-bleeding risk score for patients with atrial fibrillation: a derivation and validation study , 2016, The Lancet.

[12]  Claes Held,et al.  The ABC (age, biomarkers, clinical history) stroke risk score: a biomarker-based risk score for predicting stroke in atrial fibrillation , 2016, European heart journal.

[13]  C. Granger,et al.  Growth Differentiation Factor 15, a Marker of Oxidative Stress and Inflammation, for Risk Assessment in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation: Insights from the ARISTOTLE Trial , 2014 .

[14]  S. Yusuf,et al.  Importance of persistent elevation of cardiac biomarkers in atrial fibrillation: a RE-LY substudy , 2014, Heart.

[15]  E. Antman,et al.  Edoxaban versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation. , 2013, The New England journal of medicine.

[16]  C. Granger,et al.  Biomarkers in atrial fibrillation: a clinical review. , 2013, European heart journal.

[17]  G. Lip,et al.  Antithrombotic Therapy for Atrial Fibrillation: CHEST Guideline and Expert Panel Report , 2012, Chest.

[18]  J. Cohn,et al.  Serial Measurement of Growth-Differentiation Factor-15 in Heart Failure: Relation to Disease Severity and Prognosis in the Valsartan Heart Failure Trial , 2010, Circulation.

[19]  S. Yusuf,et al.  Dabigatran versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation. , 2009, The New England journal of medicine.

[20]  S. Schulman,et al.  Definition of major bleeding in clinical investigations of antihemostatic medicinal products in non‐surgical patients , 2005, Journal of thrombosis and haemostasis : JTH.

[21]  M. Allessie,et al.  Electrical, contractile and structural remodeling during atrial fibrillation. , 2002, Cardiovascular research.