Incentivizing knowledge exchange engagement: direct and indirect benefits of external engagement

ABSTRACT Engagement in knowledge exchange (KE) with external actors has become widely accepted as an integral mission of universities. However, research and teaching performance remain more important for career progression, while engagement activities are more weakly institutionalized. This raises the question of why academics participate in knowledge exchange engagement activities. This paper examines to what extent academics perceive that they are rewarded directly for KE by their university and to what extent they perceive to benefit in terms of their performance in other missions (research and teaching). Furthermore, we examine how these perceptions are associated with actual engagement behavior. We use data from a sample of academics in seven European universities to examine whether direct and indirect benefits from engagement are linked to engagement in a broad range of KE activities. The results suggest that direct university rewards are associated with less engagement in KE activities, while perceived indirect benefits are associated with more engagement. These relationships are particularly strong in STEM fields.

[1]  T. Thune,et al.  Task complementarity in academic work: a study of the relationship between research, education and third mission tasks among university professors , 2022, The Journal of Technology Transfer.

[2]  A. Bonaccorsi,et al.  SSH researchers make an impact differently. Looking at public research from the perspective of users , 2021 .

[3]  M. Freel,et al.  Faculty ideals and universities' third mission , 2019, Technological Forecasting and Social Change.

[4]  L. H. van de Burgwal,et al.  Incentives for knowledge valorisation: a European benchmark , 2019 .

[5]  R. Garcia,et al.  How the Benefits, Results and Barriers of Collaboration Affect University Engagement with Industry , 2018, Science and Public Policy.

[6]  Martin Weiß,et al.  Insights Into University Knowledge Transfer in the Social Sciences and Humanities (SSH) and Other Scientific Disciplines – More Similarities Than Differences , 2018, Front. Res. Metr. Anal..

[7]  Kristel Miller,et al.  Entrepreneurial academics and academic entrepreneurs: a systematic literature review , 2018, Int. J. Technol. Manag..

[8]  Magnus Gulbrandsen,et al.  The effects of non-academic work experience on external interaction and research performance , 2017 .

[9]  T. Noordewier,et al.  Overstating and Understating Interaction Results in International Business Research , 2016 .

[10]  Pere Arqué-Castells,et al.  Royalty sharing, effort and invention in universities: Evidence from Portugal and Spain , 2016 .

[11]  M. Hemmert.  Knowledge acquisition by university researchers through company collaborations: Evidence from South Korea , 2016 .

[12]  Federica Rossi,et al.  Third-mission policy goals and incentives from performance-based funding: Are they aligned? , 2016 .

[13]  Yuandi Wang,et al.  Does teaching benefit from university–industry collaboration? Investigating the role of academic commercialization and engagement , 2016, Scientometrics.

[14]  Attila Pausits,et al.  One and two equals three? The third mission of higher education institutions , 2015 .

[15]  Mabel Sánchez-Barrioluengo,et al.  Articulating the ‘three-missions’ in Spanish universities , 2014 .

[16]  Kylie M. Smith,et al.  Engagement and academic promotion: a review of the literature , 2014 .

[17]  Julia Olmos-Peñuela,et al.  Knowledge transfer activities in social sciences and humanities: Explaining the interactions of research groups with non-academic agents , 2014 .

[18]  Bruno S. Frey,et al.  And the Winner is...? The Motivating Power of Employee Awards , 2013 .

[19]  Kirsten Bregn.  Detrimental Effects of Performance-Related Pay in the Public Sector? On the Need for a Broader Theoretical Perspective , 2013 .

[20]  Fumi Kitagawa,et al.  Knowledge exchange: a comparison of policies, strategies, and funding incentives in English and Scottish higher education , 2013 .

[21]  Nola Hewitt-Dundas,et al.  Research intensity and knowledge transfer activity in UK universities , 2012 .

[22]  Alice Lam,et al.  What motivates academic scientists to engage in research commercialization: ‘Gold’, ‘ribbon’ or ‘puzzle’? , 2011 .

[23]  V. Arza.  Channels, benefits and risks of public–private interactions for knowledge transfer: conceptual framework inspired by Latin America , 2010 .

[24]  N. Baldini,et al.  Do royalties really foster university patenting activity? An answer from Italy , 2010 .

[25]  M. Perkmann,et al.  Why do academics engage with industry? The entrepreneurial university and individual motivations , 2009 .

[26]  Susanne Neckermann,et al.  Academics Appreciate Awards - A New Aspect of Incentives in Research , 2008, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[27]  Philippe Laredo,et al.  Revisiting the Third Mission of Universities: Toward a Renewed Categorization of University Activities? , 2007 .

[28]  Pablo D'Este,et al.  University-industry linkages in the UK: What are the factors underlying the variety of interactions with industry? , 2007 .

[29]  T. Thune.  University-industry collaboration: The network embeddedness approach , 2007 .

[30]  John C. Scott.  The Mission of the University: Medieval to Postmodern Transformations , 2006 .

[31]  David B. Balkin,et al.  Entrepreneurship from the Ivory Tower: Do Incentive Systems Matter? , 2004 .

[32]  Klaus M. Schmidt,et al.  Fairness and Incentives in a Multi-Task Principle-Agent Model , 2004 .

[33]  Ernst Fehr,et al.  Fairness and Incentives in a Multi-Task Principal-Agent Model , 2004 .

[34]  Canice Prendergast.  The Provision of Incentives in Firms , 1999 .

[35]  S. Ghoshal,et al.  Social Capital, Intellectual Capital, and the Organizational Advantage , 1998 .

[36]  Terry S. Overton,et al.  Estimating Nonresponse Bias in Mail Surveys , 1977 .

[37]  Kwadwo Atta-Owusu,et al.  What motivates academics for external engagement? Exploring the effects of motivational drivers and organizational fairness , 2021 .

[38]  F. Barjak,et al.  The effectiveness of policies for formal knowledge transfer from European universities and public research institutes to firms , 2015 .

[39]  Paul R. Milgrom,et al.  The economic nature of the firm: Multitask principal–agent analyses: incentive contracts, asset ownership, and job design , 2009 .

[40]  Edward A. Bender.  And the winner is... , 2005, Nursing older people.