Can MRI replace serial biopsies in men on active surveillance for prostate cancer?

Purpose of review The role of MRI in active surveillance to date has been in assessing men with low or intermediate-risk disease to identify those men harbouring higher risk disease undersampled at standard biopsy. MRI as a tool for reassessing men over the surveillance period, as an alternative to repeat standard biopsies, is also of interest. Recent findings Multiple studies suggest that MRI early in active surveillance can identify men whose prostate cancer was undersampled at initial biopsy, and MRI-targeted biopsies can be offered. There are a small number of centres now using MRI in the routine follow-up of men on active surveillance. The presence of a lesion on MRI indicates that a man is at higher likelihood of radiological progression than men with a negative MRI at diagnosis. These findings need to be validated in longer-term studies with predefined criteria for radiological significance and radiological progression. Summary MRI is useful in the identification of men with higher-risk prostate cancer prior to commencement of a formal active surveillance programme. It is also of use in following up men on active surveillance, as a way to detect change in tumour over time.

[1]  Theodorus H van der Kwast,et al.  The contemporary concept of significant versus insignificant prostate cancer. , 2011, European urology.

[2]  M. van Glabbeke,et al.  New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors , 2000, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[3]  M. Cooperberg,et al.  Active surveillance for prostate cancer: a systematic review of the literature. , 2012, European urology.

[4]  P. Gøtzsche,et al.  Natural history of breast cancers detected in the Swedish mammography screening programme: a cohort study. , 2011, The Lancet. Oncology.

[5]  J. Fütterer,et al.  Standards of reporting for MRI-targeted biopsy studies (START) of the prostate: recommendations from an International Working Group. , 2013, European urology.

[6]  Guided e-MRI prostate biopsy can solve the discordance between Gleason score biopsy and radical prostatectomy pathology. , 2010, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[7]  P. Zondervan,et al.  The Role of Imaging in the Active Surveillance of Small Renal Masses , 2014, Current Urology Reports.

[8]  P. Choyke,et al.  Accuracy of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging in confirming eligibility for active surveillance for men with prostate cancer , 2013, Cancer.

[9]  Brandon Whitcher,et al.  MAPPED study design: a 6 month randomised controlled study to evaluate the effect of dutasteride on prostate cancer volume using magnetic resonance imaging. , 2013, Contemporary clinical trials.

[10]  Thomas Hambrock,et al.  Evaluation of Diffusion-Weighted MR Imaging at Inclusion in an Active Surveillance Protocol for Low-Risk Prostate Cancer , 2013, Investigative radiology.

[11]  J O Barentsz,et al.  Beyond RECIST: molecular and functional imaging techniques for evaluation of response to targeted therapy. , 2009, Cancer treatment reviews.

[12]  H. Ahmed,et al.  Prostate Cancer Risk Inflation as a Consequence of Image-targeted Biopsy of the Prostate: A Computer Simulation Study , 2014, European urology.

[13]  Katarzyna J Macura,et al.  Prostate cancer: sextant localization at MR imaging and MR spectroscopic imaging before prostatectomy--results of ACRIN prospective multi-institutional clinicopathologic study. , 2009, Radiology.

[14]  K. Macura,et al.  Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging Characterization of Prostate Lesions in the Active Surveillance Population: Incremental Value of Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Prediction of Disease Reclassification , 2013, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[15]  Clare Allen,et al.  How good is MRI at detecting and characterising cancer within the prostate? , 2006, European urology.

[16]  E. Gehan,et al.  Will there be resistance to the RECIST (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors)? , 2000, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[17]  Neil Fleshner,et al.  Impact of multiparametric endorectal coil prostate magnetic resonance imaging on disease reclassification among active surveillance candidates: a prospective cohort study. , 2012, The Journal of urology.

[18]  Xavier Leroy,et al.  Dynamic contrast-enhanced-magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of intraprostatic prostate cancer: correlation with radical prostatectomy specimens. , 2009, Urology.

[19]  M. Melamed,et al.  Identifying candidates for active surveillance: an evaluation of the repeat biopsy strategy for men with favorable risk prostate cancer. , 2012, The Journal of urology.

[20]  P. Walsh,et al.  Pathologic and clinical findings to predict tumor extent of nonpalpable (stage T1c) prostate cancer. , 1994, JAMA.

[21]  M. Ruutu,et al.  Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in prostate cancer patients on active surveillance one year after diagnosis and before repeat biopsy , 2013, Scandinavian journal of urology.

[22]  D. Dearnaley,et al.  Medium-term outcomes of active surveillance for localised prostate cancer. , 2013, European urology.

[23]  R. V. D. van den Bergh,et al.  Psychological aspects of active surveillance , 2012, Current opinion in urology.

[24]  Yipeng Hu,et al.  Characterizing clinically significant prostate cancer using template prostate mapping biopsy. , 2011, The Journal of urology.

[25]  James A Eastham,et al.  Pathological upgrading and up staging with immediate repeat biopsy in patients eligible for active surveillance. , 2008, The Journal of urology.

[26]  B. Trock,et al.  Pathological outcomes in men with low risk and very low risk prostate cancer: implications on the practice of active surveillance. , 2013, The Journal of urology.

[27]  Benjamin E Ayres,et al.  The role of transperineal template prostate biopsies in restaging men with prostate cancer managed by active surveillance , 2012, BJU international.

[28]  M Van Glabbeke,et al.  New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, National Cancer Institute of the United States, National Cancer Institute of Canada. , 2000, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[29]  M. Giger,et al.  Quantitative analysis of multiparametric prostate MR images: differentiation between prostate cancer and normal tissue and correlation with Gleason score--a computer-aided diagnosis development study. , 2013, Radiology.

[30]  L. Schwartz,et al.  New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). , 2009, European journal of cancer.

[31]  Mana Ishibashi,et al.  Detection and Localization of Prostate Cancer With the Targeted Biopsy Strategy Based on ADC Map: A Prospective Large-Scale Cohort Study , 2012, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.