Ecosystem services trade-offs and determinants in China's Yangtze River Economic Belt from 2000 to 2015.

Ecosystem services (ES) play an important role in sustaining ecological security, sustainable development and human well-being. This study investigates spatio-temporal changes in five key ES in the Yangtze River Economic Belt of China in 2000-2015-water conservation (WC), soil retention (SR), carbon sequestration (CS), biodiversity conservation (BC) and food supply (FS), by applying three ecological models (InVEST, RUSLE, CASA). Employing scenario simulations, the study quantifies distinct effects of significant factors on ES changes. Using spatial overlapping and Spearman's rank correlation respectively, the study distinguishes spatial patterns of synergies and trade-offs between five ES at the grid and city-scales. The results show that CS, FS, WC and SR presented an overall upward trend, increasing by 22.7%, 16.9%, 6.4% and 4.7%, respectively, while BC remained steady with a marginal degradation. Change in these five ES exhibited dramatic spatial heterogeneity. Across 131 cities, 98.5% of which increased in CS, 87.7% in WC, 68.5% in FS, and 53.1% in SR, while more than half experienced slight degradation in BC. There is high heterogeneity and a great diversity among spatial distributions of ES synergies and trade-offs, which is largely dependent on ES pairs and spatial patterns of land use. Land use/land cover change was the dominant force driving changes in SR, BC and CS, while meteorological factors exhibited a greater effect on WS change than land use/land cover change. The paper examines the synergies between WC-SR, CS-BC and BC-FS on the city level, while WC-BC exhibits significant trade-offs, and no significant relationships for other ES pairs. It is imperative that ES trade-offs at different scales are incorporated to strengthen ecological protection and management policies in project implementation, maintaining ES within vital regions in China. More sophisticated methods and more ES indicators need to be incorporated to enhance the robustness and completeness of assessment.

[1]  Yi'na Hu,et al.  Integrating ecosystem services trade-offs with paddy land-to-dry land decisions: A scenario approach in Erhai Lake Basin, southwest China. , 2018, The Science of the total environment.

[2]  Guishan Yang,et al.  Changing patterns and determinants of natural capital in the Yangtze River Delta of China 2000-2010. , 2014, The Science of the total environment.

[3]  José I. Barredo,et al.  Mapping and assessment of ecosystems and their services - An analytical framework for ecosystem assessments under action 5 of the EU biodiversity strategy to 2020 , 2013 .

[4]  M. Isabirye,et al.  Prediction of soil erosion in a Lake Victoria basin catchment using a GIS-based Universal Soil Loss model , 2003 .

[5]  Wenwu Zhao,et al.  Ecosystem service trade-offs and their influencing factors: A case study in the Loess Plateau of China. , 2017, The Science of the total environment.

[6]  J. Mcneely,et al.  The Wealth of Nature: Ecosystem Services, Biodiversity, and Human Well-Being , 2009 .

[7]  Millenium Ecosystem Assessment.  Ecosystems and human well-being: synthesis , 2005 .

[8]  Michael Robertson,et al.  Quantifying ecosystem services trade-offs from agricultural practices , 2014 .

[9]  Jinyue Yan,et al.  The development of China's Yangtze River Economic Belt: how to make it in a green way? , 2017, Science bulletin.

[10]  Juergen Kreyling,et al.  Interactions among ecosystem services across Europe: Bagplots and cumulative correlation coefficients reveal synergies, trade-offs, and regional patterns , 2015 .

[11]  M. Feldman,et al.  Natural capital and ecosystem services informing decisions: From promise to practice , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[12]  D. Semmens,et al.  A GIS application for assessing, mapping, and quantifying the social values of ecosystem services , 2011 .

[13]  John B. Bradford,et al.  Recognizing trade‐offs in multi‐objective land management , 2012 .

[14]  Yanxu Liu,et al.  Linking ecosystem services and landscape patterns to assess urban ecosystem health: A case study in Shenzhen City, China , 2015 .

[15]  Fabio Zagonari,et al.  Using ecosystem services in decision-making to support sustainable development: Critiques, model development, a case study, and perspectives. , 2016, The Science of the total environment.

[16]  G. Daily,et al.  Modeling multiple ecosystem services, biodiversity conservation, commodity production, and tradeoffs at landscape scales , 2009 .

[17]  A. Zhu,et al.  A China data set of soil properties for land surface modeling , 2013 .

[18]  Jie Guo,et al.  A land-cover-based approach to assessing ecosystem services supply and demand dynamics in the rapidly urbanizing Yangtze River Delta region , 2018 .

[19]  Xibao Xu,et al.  Ecological risk assessment of ecosystem services in the Taihu Lake Basin of China from 1985 to 2020. , 2016, The Science of the total environment.

[20]  G. Daily,et al.  Integrating ecosystem-service tradeoffs into land-use decisions , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[21]  Garry D. Peterson,et al.  Understanding relationships among multiple ecosystem services. , 2009, Ecology letters.

[22]  G. Mace,et al.  Bringing Ecosystem Services into Economic Decision-Making: Land Use in the United Kingdom , 2013, Science.

[23]  E. Jeppesen,et al.  Using palaeolimnological data and historical records to assess long-term dynamics of ecosystem services in typical Yangtze shallow lakes (China). , 2017, The Science of the total environment.

[24]  Nina Schwarz,et al.  Synergies, Trade-offs, and Losses of Ecosystem Services in Urban Regions: an Integrated Multiscale Framework Applied to the Leipzig-Halle Region, Germany , 2012 .

[25]  Ling Li,et al.  Lake hydrology, water quality and ecology impacts of altered river–lake interactions: advances in research on the middle Yangtze river , 2016 .

[26]  Xibao Xu,et al.  Impacts of China's Three Gorges Dam Project on net primary productivity in the reservoir area. , 2011, The Science of the total environment.

[27]  J. Randerson,et al.  Terrestrial ecosystem production: A process model based on global satellite and surface data , 1993 .

[28]  W. H. Wischmeier,et al.  Predicting rainfall erosion losses : a guide to conservation planning , 1978 .

[29]  Boyan Li,et al.  Trade-offs and synergies in ecosystem services for the Yinchuan Basin in China , 2018 .

[30]  Stefano Balbi,et al.  Modeling trade-offs among ecosystem services in agricultural production systems , 2015, Environ. Model. Softw..

[31]  Xuguang Tang,et al.  Impacts of land use changes on net ecosystem production in the Taihu Lake Basin of China from 1985 to 2010 , 2017 .

[32]  Xiyong Hou,et al.  How important are the wetlands in the middle-lower Yangtze River region: An ecosystem service valuation approach , 2014 .

[33]  Jiansheng Wu,et al.  Ecosystem services response to urbanization in metropolitan areas: Thresholds identification. , 2017, The Science of the total environment.

[34]  E. Uchida,et al.  The effect of a protected area on the tradeoffs between short-run and long-run benefits from mangrove ecosystems , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[35]  Mingsong Zhao,et al.  Response of ecosystem services to socioeconomic development in the Yangtze River Basin, China , 2017 .

[36]  B. Halpern,et al.  Evaluating tradeoffs among ecosystem services to inform marine spatial planning , 2013 .

[37]  Jian Peng,et al.  Significant trade-off for the impact of Grain-for-Green Programme on ecosystem services in North-western Yunnan, China. , 2017, The Science of the total environment.

[38]  K. Chan,et al.  Human impacts and ecosystem services: Insufficient research for trade-off evaluation , 2015 .

[39]  Daniel C. Yoder,et al.  The application of the Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation, Version 2, to evaluate the impacts of alternative climate change scenarios on runoff and sediment yield , 2012, Journal of Soil and Water Conservation.

[40]  Steve Norman,et al.  Integrating ecosystem services into risk management decisions: case study with Spanish citrus and the insecticide chlorpyrifos. , 2015, The Science of the total environment.

[41]  S. Gergel,et al.  Ecosystem service trade-offs and synergies misunderstood without landscape history , 2016 .

[42]  Alexander J. Henshaw,et al.  Polyscape: A GIS mapping framework providing efficient and spatially explicit landscape-scale valuation of multiple ecosystem services , 2013 .

[43]  Bingfang Wu,et al.  Improvements in ecosystem services from investments in natural capital , 2016, Science.

[44]  Stephen Polasky,et al.  Projected land-use change impacts on ecosystem services in the United States , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[45]  R. O'Neill,et al.  The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital , 1997, Nature.

[46]  Carrie V. Kappel,et al.  Ecosystem service tradeoff analysis reveals the value of marine spatial planning for multiple ocean uses , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[47]  Pei Xu,et al.  Mapping the flood mitigation services of ecosystems - A case study in the Upper Yangtze River Basin , 2013 .

[48]  A. Kinzig,et al.  Linking ecosystem characteristics to final ecosystem services for public policy , 2014, Ecology letters.

[49]  Martin Volk,et al.  Towards systematic analyses of ecosystem service trade-offs and synergies : Main concepts, methods and the road ahead , 2017 .