Evaluation of undersized bioretention stormwater control measures for treatment of highway bridge deck runoff.

Two grassed bioretention cells were constructed in the easement of a bridge deck in Knightdale, North Carolina, USA, in October, 2009. One was intentionally undersized ('small'), while the other was full sized ('large') per current North Carolina standards. The large and small cells captured runoff from the 25- and 8-mm events, respectively. Both bioretention cells employed average fill media depths of 0.65 m and internal water storage (IWS) zones of 0.6 m. Flow-proportional, composite water quality samples were collected and analyzed for nitrogen species, phosphorus species, and TSS. During 13 months of data collection, the large cell's median effluent concentrations and loads were less than those from the small cell. The small cell's TN and TSS load reductions were 84 and 50%, respectively, of those achieved by the large cell, with both cells significantly reducing TN and TSS. TP loads were not significantly reduced by either cell, likely due to low TP concentrations in the highway runoff which may have approached irreducible levels. Outflow pollutant loads from the large and small cell were not significantly different from one another for any of the examined pollutants. The small cell's relative performance provides support for retrofitting undersized systems in urbanized areas where there is insufficient space available for conventional full-sized stormwater treatment systems.

[1]  Ana Deletic,et al.  Hydrologic and pollutant removal performance of stormwater biofiltration systems at the field scale , 2009 .

[2]  William F. Hunt,et al.  Mitigation of Impervious Surface Hydrology Using Bioretention in North Carolina and Maryland , 2009 .

[3]  Michael E. Barrett,et al.  Storm Water Pollutant Removal in Roadside Vegetated Buffer Strips , 2004 .

[4]  Eric Strecker,et al.  DETERMINING URBAN STORM WATER BMP EFFECTIVENESS , 2001 .

[5]  Allen P. Davis,et al.  Field Performance of Bioretention: Hydrology Impacts , 2008 .

[6]  A. Deletic,et al.  Impact of a submerged zone and a carbon source on heavy metal removal in stormwater biofilters , 2009 .

[7]  A. Davis,et al.  Water Quality Improvement through Reductions of Pollutant Loads Using Bioretention , 2009 .

[8]  Michael E. Dietz,et al.  Saturation to improve pollutant retention in a rain garden. , 2006, Environmental science & technology.

[9]  Yongzhang Zhou,et al.  Quality characterization and impact assessment of highway runoff in urban and rural area of Guangzhou, China , 2008, Environmental monitoring and assessment.

[10]  Michael E. Dietz,et al.  A Field Evaluation of Rain Garden Flow and Pollutant Treatment , 2005 .

[11]  A. Pandit,et al.  Estimations of Soil Conservation Service Curve Numbers for Concrete and Asphalt , 2009 .

[12]  D. E. Line,et al.  Field study of the ability of two grassed bioretention cells to reduce storm-water runoff pollution. , 2009 .

[13]  William F. Hunt,et al.  Establishing Storm-Water BMP Evaluation Metrics Based upon Ambient Water Quality Associated with Benthic Macroinvertebrate Populations , 2010 .

[14]  William F. Hunt,et al.  Impacts of Media Depth on Effluent Water Quality and Hydrologic Performance of Undersized Bioretention Cells , 2011 .

[15]  William F. Hunt,et al.  Pollutant Removal and Peak Flow Mitigation by a Bioretention Cell in Urban Charlotte, N.C. , 2008 .

[16]  Marty E Tittlebaum,et al.  Event‐Based Stormwater Quality and Quantity Loadings from Elevated Urban Infrastructure Affected by Transportation , 2005, Water environment research : a research publication of the Water Environment Federation.

[17]  Mohammad Shokouhian,et al.  Water Quality Improvement through Bioretention Media: Nitrogen and Phosphorus Removal , 2006, Water environment research : a research publication of the Water Environment Federation.

[18]  Craig J. Allan,et al.  CHARACTERIZATION AND POLLUTANT LOADING ESTIMATION FOR HIGHWAY RUNOFF , 1998 .