Field dependence–independence as visuospatial and executive functioning in working memory: implications for instructional systems design and research

Field dependence–independence (FDI) has long been conceptualized and discussed as a cognitive style relevant to numerous educational approaches and outcomes. However, the FDI construct is most often measured as a cognitive ability, as opposed to a style, using instruments such as the Group-Embedded Figures test (GEFT) or the Hidden Figures Test (HFT). Specifically, FDI is typically measured as visuospatial ability and executive functioning in working memory. While measurement and use of FDI within psychological and educational research has often resulted in misleading or inconsistent discussion about cognitive styles, this review examines how the long history of FDI research continues to be relevant to contemporary instructional contexts. A broader recognition of FDI as ability is suggested in order to (a) better distinguish ability measurements from those of styles, (b) encourage a reinterpretation and awareness of theoretical connections among past studies that use instruments such as GEFT or HFT, and (c) highlight suggestions for future research and application, particularly with contemporary interactive multimedia learning tools.

[1]  C. Myers Educational Psychology , 1904, Nature.

[2]  G. A. Miller THE PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW THE MAGICAL NUMBER SEVEN, PLUS OR MINUS TWO: SOME LIMITS ON OUR CAPACITY FOR PROCESSING INFORMATION 1 , 1956 .

[3]  S. A. Karp,et al.  Field dependence and intellectual functioning. , 1961, Journal of abnormal and social psychology.

[4]  Goodenough Dr,et al.  Field dependence and intellectual functioning. , 1961 .

[5]  J. Carroll A Model of School Learning , 1963, Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education.

[6]  P K Oltman,et al.  A Portable Rod-and-Frame Apparatus , 1968, Perceptual and motor skills.

[7]  Jacob Cohen Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences , 1969, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[8]  H. A. Witkin A Manual for the embedded figures tests , 1971 .

[9]  C. Palau,et al.  ASSESSMENT IN EDUCATION , 2015 .

[10]  C. A. Moore,et al.  FIELD‐DEPENDENT AND FIELD‐INDEPENDENT COGNITIVE STYLES AND THEIR EDUCATIONAL IMPLICATIONS , 1975 .

[11]  Cathleen Stasz,et al.  Field Independence and the Structuring of Knowledge in a Social Studies Minicourse. , 1976 .

[12]  L. Cronbach,et al.  Aptitude and instructional methods , 1977 .

[13]  R. T. Coward,et al.  Cognitive style and perceptions of the ideal teacher , 1978 .

[14]  Douglas B. McLeod,et al.  The Interaction of Field Independence with Discovery Learning in Mathematics , 1979 .

[15]  V. Zanden,et al.  Educational Psychology: In Theory and Practice , 1980 .

[16]  J. Roberge,et al.  IQ, Field Dependence-Independence, and the Development of Formal Operational Thought , 1980 .

[17]  D R Goodenough,et al.  Cognitive styles: essence and origins. Field dependence and field independence. , 1981, Psychological issues.

[18]  Maribeth Gettinger,et al.  Achievement as a Function of Time Spent in Learning and Time Needed for Learning , 1984 .

[19]  Frank P. McKenna,et al.  Measures of field dependence: Cognitive style or cognitive ability? , 1984 .

[20]  Bernard M. Frank Effect of Field Independence-Dependence and Study Technique on Learning From a Lecture , 1984 .

[21]  S. Messick The nature of cognitive styles: Problems and promise in educational practice , 1984 .

[22]  A. Moran Unresolved Issues in Research on Field Dependence-Independence. , 1985 .

[23]  John G. Hedberg,et al.  Matching Feedback and Cognitive Style in Visual CAI Tasks. , 1985 .

[24]  John Palmer,et al.  On the relation between spatial ability and field dependence , 1986 .

[25]  Bernard M. Frank Cognitive Styles and Teacher Education: Field Dependence and Areas of Specialization Among Teacher Education Majors. , 1986 .

[26]  Designing for diversity: Are field-dependent learners less suited to distance education programs of instruction?* , 1987 .

[27]  Kenneth A. Kavale,et al.  Substance over Style: Assessing the Efficacy of Modality Testing and Teaching , 1987 .

[28]  John Sweller,et al.  Cognitive Load During Problem Solving: Effects on Learning , 1988, Cogn. Sci..

[29]  Joachim Tiedemann,et al.  Measures of Cognitive Styles: A Critical Review , 1989 .

[30]  P. Lachenbruch Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.) , 1989 .

[31]  L. Curry A Critique of the Research on Learning Styles. , 1990 .

[32]  R. Brandt,et al.  On Knowledge and Cognitive Skills: A Conversation with David Perkins. , 1990 .

[33]  A. Paivio,et al.  Dual coding theory and education , 1991 .

[34]  Neil H. Schwartz,et al.  Individual differences in the retention of maps , 1991 .

[35]  Richard E. Snow,et al.  Aptitude Theory: Yesterday, Today, and Tomorrow , 1992 .

[36]  O. Saracho The effects of the teachers’ cognitive styles on their students academic achievement , 1993 .

[37]  R. Mayer,et al.  For whom is a picture worth a thousand words? Extensions of a dual-coding theory of multimedia learning. , 1994 .

[38]  Gwan-Sik Yoon,et al.  The Effects of Instructional Control, Cognitive Style, and Prior Knowledge on Learning of Computer-Assisted Instruction , 1994 .

[39]  S. Messick The matter of style: Manifestations of personality in cognition, learning, and teaching , 1994 .

[40]  O. Saracho,et al.  Matching Preschool Children's and Teachers' Cognitive Styles , 1994, Perceptual and motor skills.

[41]  James D. Klein,et al.  The effects of search tool type and cognitive style on performance during hypermedia database searches , 1996 .

[42]  Myint Swe Khine,et al.  The Interaction of Cognitive Styles with Varying Levels of Feedback in Multimedia Presentation , 1996, Multimedia Technology and Applications.

[43]  Samuel Messick BRIDGING COGNITION AND PERSONALITY IN EDUCATION: THE ROLE OF STYLE IN PERFORMANCE AND DEVELOPMENT , 1996 .

[44]  C. Tinajero,et al.  Field dependence‐independence and academic achievement: a re‐examination of their relationship , 1997 .

[45]  R. Riding On the Nature of Cognitive Style , 1997 .

[46]  P. Black,et al.  Assessment and Classroom Learning , 1998 .

[47]  Kent A. Rittschof,et al.  Learner Differences for Affecting Schemata for Thematic Maps. , 1998 .

[48]  R. Mayer,et al.  Maximizing Constructivist Learning From Multimedia Communications by Minimizing Cognitive Load , 1999 .

[49]  Steven A. Stahl Different Strokes for Different Folks? A Critique of Learning Styles. , 1999 .

[50]  David M. Moore,et al.  Interaction of Cognitive Style and Learner Control in a Hypermedia Environment , 2000 .

[51]  J. Richardson,et al.  Field Dependence Revisited I: Intelligence , 2000 .

[52]  Mehmet Bahar,et al.  The Relationship Between Some Psychological Factors and their Effect on the Performance of Grid Questions and Word Association Tests , 2000 .

[53]  M. J. Emerson,et al.  Field dependence–independence from a working memory perspective: A dual-task investigation of the Hidden Figures Test , 2001, Memory.

[54]  Nigel Ford,et al.  Matching/mismatching revisited: an empirical study of learning and teaching styles , 2001, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[55]  Mary Hegarty,et al.  How are visuospatial working memory, executive functioning, and spatial abilities related? A latent-variable analysis. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[56]  David A. Rettinger,et al.  How are visuospatial working memory, executive functioning, and spatial abilities related? A latent-variable analysis. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[57]  Robert D. Macredie,et al.  Cognitive styles and hypermedia navigation: Development of a learning model , 2002, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[58]  J. T. Richards,et al.  Training, transfer, and retention of three-dimensional spatial memory in virtual environments. , 2002, Journal of vestibular research : equilibrium & orientation.

[59]  H. Forssberg,et al.  Training of Working Memory in Children With ADHD , 2002 .

[60]  R. Mayer,et al.  Three Facets of Visual and Verbal Learners: Cognitive Ability, Cognitive Style, and Learning Preference. , 2003 .

[61]  Richard E. Mayer,et al.  Elements of a Science of E-Learning , 2003 .

[62]  D. Leutner,et al.  Direct Measurement of Cognitive Load in Multimedia Learning , 2003 .

[63]  George Ghinea,et al.  The impact of cognitive styles on perceptual distributed multimedia quality , 2003, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[64]  R. Mayer,et al.  Nine Ways to Reduce Cognitive Load in Multimedia Learning , 2003 .

[65]  V. Aleven,et al.  Help Seeking and Help Design in Interactive Learning Environments , 2003 .

[66]  Olivia N. Saracho,et al.  Matching Teachers' and Students' Cognitive Styles , 2003 .

[67]  C. S. Green,et al.  Action video game modifies visual selective attention , 2003, Nature.

[68]  C. Angeli,et al.  Examining the effects of text-only and text-and-visual instructional materials on the achievement of field-dependent and field-independent learners during problem-solving with modeling software , 2004 .

[69]  Li-fang Zhang,et al.  Field-dependence/independence: cognitive style or perceptual ability? - Validating against thinking styles and academic achievement , 2004 .

[70]  Robert D. Macredie,et al.  Cognitive Modeling of Student Learning in Web-Based Instructional Programs , 2004, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[71]  Francis M. Dwyer,et al.  Effect of Instructional Strategies and Individual Differences: A Meta-Analytic Assessment. , 2005 .

[72]  R. Sternberg,et al.  A Threefold Model of Intellectual Styles , 2005 .

[73]  J. Merriënboer,et al.  Research on cognitive load theory and its design implications for e-learning , 2005 .

[74]  J. Sweller,et al.  Cognitive Load Theory and Complex Learning: Recent Developments and Future Directions , 2005 .

[75]  R. Moreno Learning in High-Tech and Multimedia Environments , 2006 .

[76]  Thomas Huk,et al.  Who benefits from learning with 3D models? the case of spatial ability , 2006, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[77]  P. Roelfsema,et al.  The effect of items in working memory on the deployment of attention and the eyes during visual search. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[78]  D. Tomasi,et al.  Different activation patterns for working memory load and visual attention load , 2007, Brain Research.

[79]  C S Green,et al.  Action-Video-Game Experience Alters the Spatial Resolution of Vision , 2007, Psychological science.

[80]  M. D’Esposito Working memory. , 2008, Handbook of clinical neurology.

[81]  Xiao-Hua Zhou,et al.  Statistical Methods for Meta‐Analysis , 2008 .

[82]  Dennis J. Delprato,et al.  Mind and Its Evolution: A Dual Coding Theoretical Approach , 2009 .

[83]  Illusions of space, field dependence and the efficiency of working memory , 2010 .

[84]  Sanghee Yeo Handbook of individual differences, learning, and instruction. , 2010, Korean journal of medical education.

[85]  In search of the hidden: contextual processing in parietal cortex , 2010 .