Sensory experience ratings for over 5,000 mono- and disyllabic words

[1]  Michael J Cortese,et al.  Imageability and age of acquisition effects in disyllabic word recognition , 2013, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[2]  J. Adelman.  Visual word recognition, volume 2 : meaning and context, individuals and development , 2012 .

[3]  Marc Brysbaert,et al.  Identifying students with dyslexia in higher education , 2012, Annals of dyslexia.

[4]  M. Brysbaert,et al.  Age-of-acquisition ratings for 30,000 English words , 2012, Behavior research methods.

[5]  Ian S. Hargreaves,et al.  The neural correlates of the body-object interaction effect in semantic processing , 2012, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[6]  Michael J. Cortese,et al.  Imageability estimates for 3,000 disyllabic words , 2011, Behavior Research Methods.

[7]  Barbara J. Juhasz,et al.  Tangible Words are Recognized Faster: The Grounding of Meaning in Sensory and Perceptual Systems , 2011, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[8]  K. Rastle,et al.  The British Lexicon Project: Lexical decision data for 28,730 monosyllabic and disyllabic English words , 2011, Behavior research methods.

[9]  Penny M. Pexman,et al.  Imageability and body–object interaction ratings for 599 multisyllabic nouns , 2011, Behavior research methods.

[10]  Ian S. Hargreaves,et al.  Is more always better? Effects of semantic richness on lexical decision, speeded pronunciation, and semantic classification , 2011, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[11]  Cyrus Shaoul,et al.  Exploring lexical co-occurrence space using HiDEx , 2010, Behavior research methods.

[12]  G. Vigliocco,et al.  Emotion words, regardless of polarity, have a processing advantage over neutral words , 2009, Cognition.

[13]  M. Sereno,et al.  Short article: Size matters: Bigger is faster , 2009, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[14]  D. Balota,et al.  Visual word recognition of multisyllabic words , 2009 .

[15]  Max Kuhn,et al.  Building Predictive Models in R Using the caret Package , 2008 .

[16]  Paul D. Siakaluk,et al.  Body—object interaction ratings for 1,618 monosyllabic nouns , 2008, Behavior research methods.

[17]  D. Balota,et al.  Moving beyond Coltheart’s N: A new measure of orthographic similarity , 2008, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[18]  M. Gullick,et al.  Age of acquisition's effect on memory for semantically associated word pairs , 2008, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[19]  Ian S. Hargreaves,et al.  There are many ways to be rich: Effects of three measures of semantic richness on visual word recognition , 2008, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[20]  Penny M. Pexman,et al.  Evidence for the activation of sensorimotor information during visual word recognition: The body–object interaction effect , 2008, Cognition.

[21]  Lee H. Wurm,et al.  Danger and usefulness: An alternative framework for understanding rapid evaluation effects in perception? , 2007, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[22]  Rebecca Treiman,et al.  The English Lexicon Project , 2007, Behavior research methods.

[23]  Michael J Cortese,et al.  Age of acquisition predicts naming and lexical-decision performance above and beyond 22 other predictor variables: An analysis of 2,342 words , 2007, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[24]  Friedemann Pulvermüller,et al.  Reading cinnamon activates olfactory brain regions , 2006, NeuroImage.

[25]  M. Brysbaert,et al.  Reexamining the word length effect in visual word recognition: New evidence from the English Lexicon Project , 2006, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[26]  Mark Yates,et al.  Phonological neighbors speed visual word processing: evidence from multiple tasks. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[27]  Barbara J. Juhasz,et al.  Age-of-acquisition effects in word and picture identification. , 2005, Psychological bulletin.

[28]  Friedemann Pulvermüller,et al.  Brain Signatures of Meaning Access in Action Word Recognition , 2005, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[29]  J. Tenenbaum,et al.  The Large-Scale Structure of Semantic Networks: Statistical Analyses and a Model of Semantic Growth , 2005, Cogn. Sci..

[30]  Michael J Cortese,et al.  Imageability ratings for 3,000 monosyllabic words , 2004, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[31]  Michael J Cortese,et al.  Visual word recognition of single-syllable words. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[32]  Christine D. Wilson,et al.  Grounding conceptual knowledge in modality-specific systems , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[33]  Mark S. Seidenberg,et al.  Age of Acquisition Effects in Word Reading and Other Tasks , 2002 .

[34]  M. L. Lambon Ralph,et al.  Age of acquisition effects in adult lexical processing reflect loss of plasticity in maturing systems: insights from connectionist networks. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[35]  M Brysbaert,et al.  Age-of-acquisition effects in semantic processing tasks. , 2000, Acta psychologica.

[36]  Curt Burgess,et al.  Producing high-dimensional semantic spaces from lexical co-occurrence , 1996 .

[37]  George A. Miller,et al.  WordNet: A Lexical Database for English , 1995, HLT.

[38]  R. W. Stowe,et al.  Context availability and lexical decisions for abstract and concrete words , 1988 .

[39]  D. Balota,et al.  Are lexical decisions a good measure of lexical access? The role of word frequency in the neglected decision stage. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[40]  A. Cutler.  Making up materials is a confounded nuisance, or: Will we able to run any psycholinguistic experiments at all in 1990? , 1981, Cognition.

[41]  R. Logie,et al.  Age-of-acquisition, imagery, concreteness, familiarity, and ambiguity measures for 1,944 words , 1980 .

[42]  B. Bergum,et al.  Attention and Performance VI , 1978 .

[43]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[44]  David A. Balota,et al.  Megastudies : What do millions ( or so ) of trials tell us about lexical processing ? , 2011 .

[45]  Daragh E. Sibley,et al.  Error, error everywhere: A look at megastudies of word reading , 2009 .

[46]  Lawrence W. Barsalou,et al.  Language and simulation in conceptual processing , 2008 .

[47]  Dirk van Rijn,et al.  Proceedings of the 31st annual conference of the Cognitive Science Society , 2003 .

[48]  M Coltheart,et al.  DRC: a dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. , 2001, Psychological review.

[49]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Understanding normal and impaired word reading: computational principles in quasi-regular domains. , 1996, Psychological review.

[50]  W. F. Battig,et al.  Handbook of semantic word norms , 1978 .

[51]  Max Coltheart,et al.  Access to the internal lexicon , 1977 .

[52]  Christopher A. Kurby,et al.  Please Scroll down for Article the Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Semantic Size Does Not Matter: " Bigger " Words Are Not Recognized Faster , 2022 .

[53]  Mark J. Huff,et al.  Human Neuroscience Original Research Article an Abundance of Riches: Cross-task Comparisons of Semantic Richness Effects in Visual Word Recognition , 2022 .