Strengthening protected areas for biodiversity and ecosystem services in China

Significance Following severe environmental degradation from rapid economic development, China is now advancing policies to secure biodiversity and ecosystem services. We report the first nationwide assessment, showing that protected areas (PAs) are not well delineated to protect either biodiversity or key ecosystem services. This serious deficiency exists in many countries. We propose creating a national park system in China to help guide development along a path of green growth, improving the well-being of both people and nature. This involves establishing new, strictly protected PAs for biodiversity and ecosystem services that are highly sensitive to human impacts, as well as a new PA category—in China and ideally worldwide—for integrating biodiversity, ecosystem services, and human activities to achieve sustainable development goals. Recent expansion of the scale of human activities poses severe threats to Earth’s life-support systems. Increasingly, protected areas (PAs) are expected to serve dual goals: protect biodiversity and secure ecosystem services. We report a nationwide assessment for China, quantifying the provision of threatened species habitat and four key regulating services—water retention, soil retention, sandstorm prevention, and carbon sequestration—in nature reserves (the primary category of PAs in China). We find that China’s nature reserves serve moderately well for mammals and birds, but not for other major taxa, nor for these key regulating ecosystem services. China’s nature reserves encompass 15.1% of the country’s land surface. They capture 17.9% and 16.4% of the entire habitat area for threatened mammals and birds, but only 13.1% for plants, 10.0% for amphibians, and 8.5% for reptiles. Nature reserves encompass only 10.2–12.5% of the source areas for the four key regulating services. They are concentrated in western China, whereas much threatened species’ habitat and regulating service source areas occur in eastern provinces. Our analysis illuminates a strategy for greatly strengthening PAs, through creating the first comprehensive national park system of China. This would encompass both nature reserves, in which human activities are highly restricted, and a new category of PAs for ecosystem services, in which human activities not impacting key services are permitted. This could close the gap in a politically feasible way. We also propose a new category of PAs globally, for sustaining the provision of ecosystems services and achieving sustainable development goals.

[1]  G. Daily,et al.  Securing natural capital and expanding equity to rescale civilization , 2012, Nature.

[2]  Stuart L. Pimm,et al.  Global patterns of terrestrial vertebrate diversity and conservation , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[3]  Xinshi Zhang,et al.  Value of ecosystem services in China , 2000 .

[4]  W. Cha The Current Population and Distribution of Wild Crested Ibis Nipponia nippon , 2014 .

[5]  Peter Kareiva,et al.  What is Conservation Science? , 2012 .

[6]  C. Bradshaw,et al.  Human population reduction is not a quick fix for environmental problems , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[7]  Y. Zong,et al.  The 1998 Flood on the Yangtze, China , 2000 .

[8]  T. Robinson,et al.  Sustainable Development Goals , 2016 .

[9]  Zhijun Ma,et al.  Assessment of red list of birds in China , 2016 .

[10]  P. Marquet,et al.  Representation of Ecosystem Services by Terrestrial Protected Areas: Chile as a Case Study , 2013, PloS one.

[11]  G. Daily,et al.  Natural Capital: Theory and Practice of Mapping Ecosystem Services , 2011 .

[12]  Min Wang,et al.  China’s geographical regionalization in Chinese secondary school curriculum (1902–2012) , 2013, Journal of Geographical Sciences.

[13]  Binbin V. Li,et al.  China's endemic vertebrates sheltering under the protective umbrella of the giant panda , 2016, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[14]  Bingfang Wu,et al.  Improvements in ecosystem services from investments in natural capital , 2016, Science.

[15]  A. Cleveland China's Mammal Diversity and Geographic Distribution , 2016, Journal of Mammalogy.

[16]  R. Costanza,et al.  Global mapping of ecosystem services and conservation priorities , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[17]  Wu Yang,et al.  Framing ecosystem services in the telecoupled Anthropocene , 2016 .

[18]  B. Soares-Filho,et al.  Role of Brazilian Amazon protected areas in climate change mitigation , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[19]  H. Possingham,et al.  Dynamic marine protected areas can improve the resilience of coral reef systems. , 2009, Ecology letters.

[20]  M. Feldman,et al.  Natural capital and ecosystem services informing decisions: From promise to practice , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[21]  N. Dudley Guidelines for applying protected area management categories , 2008 .

[22]  D. Doak,et al.  What is the future of conservation? , 2014, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[23]  G A da Fonseca,et al.  Effectiveness of parks in protecting tropical biodiversity. , 2001, Science.

[24]  Sue Stolton,et al.  Guidelines for applying protected area management categories including IUCN WCPA best practice guidance on recognising protected areas and assigning management categories and governance types , 2013 .

[25]  G. Daily,et al.  Confronting and resolving competing values behind conservation objectives , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[26]  Fu Bo,et al.  Scheme of ecological regionalization in China , 2001 .

[27]  N. Kingston,et al.  World Database on Protected Areas (WDPA) , 2013 .

[28]  Chang’an Li,et al.  Human impact on floods and flood disasters on the Yangtze River , 2001 .

[29]  Douglas W. Yu,et al.  Effectiveness of China's nature reserves in representing ecological diversity , 2011 .

[30]  Jianguo Liu,et al.  An integrated approach to understanding the linkages between ecosystem services and human well‐being , 2015, Ecosystem Health and Sustainability.