Cooperation and Conflict in the Evolution of Signal Interactions

Various inv ertebrate and vertebrate species in which males produce acoustic or biolumi nescent signals for long-range sexual advertisement exhibit collec­ tive patterns of temporal signal interactions. These patterns range fro m simple concentrations of signaling during a narrow diel interval to synchronous and alternating interactions entailing precisely timed phase relationships between neighboring individuals. Signals invo lved in synchrony and alternation are generally produced with rhythms that are under the control of central nervous oscilla tors. Neighboring individuals effe ct these interactions via mutual phase delays or phase advances of their oscill ators or actual changes in the fre e-run­ ning periods of their oscilla tors. Both synchrony and alternation may repr esent adaptations to avoid spiteful behavior or to maximize the ability of a local group to attract females or evade natural enemies. Alternatively, these collec­ tive patterns may represent incid ental outcomes of competition between males jamming each othe r' s signals. The neural mechanisms that effect signal jam­ ming can be selected for by critical psychophysical factors such as precedence eff ects. Additional competitive pressures that may generate synchrony, alter­ nation, and other collective patterns of signal interaction include mutual as­ sessment of rivals, evasion of detection by dominant individ uals, disruption of communication within courting pairs, and narr owness of the time intervals during which recep tive females are present.

[1]  J. Buck,et al.  Biology of Synchronous Flashing of Fireflies , 1966, Nature.

[2]  W. Bailey,et al.  The Tettigoniidae: biology, systematics and evolution. , 1990 .

[3]  Patrick L. Galliart The acoustic behavior of the katydid Amblycorypha parvipennis and the function of acoustic interaction in sexual selection , 1993 .

[4]  Glenn K. Morris,et al.  Calling display and mating behaviour of Copiphora rhinoceros Pictet (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae) , 1980, Animal Behaviour.

[5]  J. M. Smith,et al.  The Logic of Animal Conflict , 1973, Nature.

[6]  Peter M. Narins,et al.  Characterization of the advertisement call oscillator in the frogEleutherodactylus coqui , 1985, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[7]  J. Buck,et al.  FLASH CONTROL AND FEMALE DIALOG REPERTORY IN THE FIREFLY PHOTINUS GREENI , 1986 .

[8]  P. Narins Evolution of Anuran Chorus Behavior: Neural and Behavioral Constraints , 1992, The American Naturalist.

[9]  M. D. Jones Sound Signals and Alternation Behaviour in Pholidoptera , 1963, Nature.

[10]  R. Aiken Effects of group density on call rate, phonokinesis, and mating success in Palmacorixa nana (Heteroptera: Corixidae) , 1982 .

[11]  J. Copeland,et al.  Flash competition in male Photinus macdermotti fireflies , 1988, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[12]  J. E. Lloyd,et al.  Model for the Mating Protocol of Synchronously Flashing Fireflies , 1973, Nature.

[13]  J. Schwartz THE FUNCTION OF CALL ALTERNATION IN ANURAN AMPHIBIANS: A TEST OF THREE HYPOTHESES , 1987, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[14]  Charles S. Peskin,et al.  Mathematical aspects of heart physiology , 1975 .

[15]  Michael D Greenfield,et al.  Katydid synchronous chorusing is an evolutionarily stable outcome of female choice , 1993, Nature.

[16]  Effect of Intermale Distance and Female Presence on the Nature of Chorusing by Paired Amblycorypha Parvipennis (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae) Males , 1991 .

[17]  Torben Dabelsteen,et al.  INTERACTIVE PLAYBACK: A FINELY TUNED RESPONSE , 1992 .

[18]  V. Wynne-Edwards Animal dispersion in relation to social behaviour , 1962 .

[19]  K. Wells The social behaviour of anuran amphibians , 1977, Animal Behaviour.

[20]  Peter M. Narins,et al.  Biological Constraints on Anuran Acoustic Communication: Auditory Capabilities of Naturally Behaving Animals , 1992 .

[21]  P. Narins Behavioral refractory period in neotropical treefrogs , 1982, Journal of comparative physiology.

[22]  F. Huber Brain controlled behaviour in Orthopterans , 1965 .

[23]  R M Church,et al.  Comparison of variance and covariance patterns in parallel and serial theories of timing. , 1992, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[24]  F. Harrington CHORUS HOWLING BY WOLVES: ACOUSTIC STRUCTURE, PACK SIZE AND THE BEAU GESTE EFFECT , 1989 .

[25]  B Soucek Model of alternating and aggressive communication with the example of katydid chirping. , 1975, Journal of theoretical biology.

[26]  M. Ryan,et al.  Sexual selection for sensory exploitation in the frog Physalaemus pustulosus , 1990, Nature.

[27]  T. J. Walker,et al.  Energetics of singing in crickets: Effect of temperature in three trilling species (Orthoptera: Gryllidae) , 1981, Journal of comparative physiology.

[28]  Ian Stewart,et al.  Coupled Oscillators and Biological Synchronization A subtle mathematical thread connects clocks, ambling elephants, brain rhythms and the onset of chaos , 1993 .

[29]  M. D. Jones The acoustic behaviour of the bush cricket Pholidoptera griseoaptera. I. Alternation, synchronism and rivalry between males. , 1966, The Journal of experimental biology.

[30]  G. Klump,et al.  Use of non-arbitrary acoustic criteria in mate choice by female gray tree frogs , 1987, Nature.

[31]  The Effect of Acoustic Signals on the Chirp Rhythm in the Bush Cricket Pholidoptera Griseoaptera , 1974 .

[32]  A. Arak,et al.  The adaptive significance of acoustic spacing in male bushcrickets Tettigonia viridissima: a perturbation experiment , 2004, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[33]  J. Buck,et al.  CONTROL OF FLASHING IN FIREFLIES. II. ROLE OF CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM , 1963 .

[34]  K. C. Shaw An Analysis of the Phonoresponse of Males of the True Katydid, Pterophylla Camellifolia (Fabricius) (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae) , 1968 .

[35]  S. Telford,et al.  The effect of chorus organization on mate localization in the Painted Reed frog (Hyperolius marmoratus) , 2004, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[36]  M. Ryan Synchronized calling in a treefrog (Smilisca sila). Short behavioral latencies and implications for neural pathways involved in call perception and production. , 1986, Brain, Behavior and Evolution.

[37]  Georg M. Klump,et al.  Masking of acoustic signals by the chorus background noise in the green tree frog: A limitation on mate choice , 1988, Animal Behaviour.

[38]  K. Henwood,et al.  A Quantitative Analysis of the Dawn Chorus: Temporal Selection for Communicatory Optimization , 1979, The American Naturalist.

[39]  Thorleifur Eiríksson Density Dependent Song Duration in the Grasshopper Omocestus Viridulus , 1992 .

[40]  Michael D Greenfield,et al.  Phonotaxis and aggression in the coneheaded katydid Neoconocephalus affinis , 1985 .

[41]  Peter K. McGregor,et al.  Playback and Studies of Animal Communication , 1992, NATO ASI Series.

[42]  Gerald S. Pollack,et al.  Discrimination of calling song models by the cricket,Teleogryllus oceanicus: the influence of sound direction on neural encoding of the stimulus temporal pattern and on phonotactic behavior , 1986, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[43]  G. Pollack,et al.  Selective attention in an insect auditory neuron , 1988, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[44]  John R. Krebs,et al.  THE DAWN CHORUS IN THE GREAT TIT (PARUS-MAJOR) - PROXIMATE AND ULTIMATE CAUSES , 1983 .

[45]  B. Ermentrout,et al.  An adaptive model for synchrony in the firefly Pteroptyx malaccae , 1991 .

[46]  William E. Wagner Deceptive or honest signalling of fighting ability? A test of alternative hypotheses for the function of changes in call dominant frequency by male cricket frogs , 1992, Animal Behaviour.

[47]  J. Doolan,et al.  Spatial Dynamics and Breeding Ecology in the Cicada Cystosoma saundersii: The Interaction Between Distributions of Resources and Intraspecific Behaviour , 1981 .

[48]  A. Meixner,et al.  Acoustic and Associated Behavior of the Coneheaded Katydid, Neoconocephalus nebrascensis (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae) , 1986 .

[49]  E. Sismondo,et al.  Synchronous, Alternating, and Phase-Locked Stridulation by a Tropical Katydid , 1990, Science.

[50]  T. Burk Symposium: Insect Behavioral Ecology--'81: Evolutionary Significance of Predation on Sexually Signalling Males , 1982 .

[51]  A. J. Young Studies on the acoustic behaviour of certain orthoptera , 1971 .

[52]  D. Otte Evolution of Cricket Songs , 1992 .

[53]  J. Buck,et al.  Toward a Functional Interpretation of Synchronous Flashing by Fireflies , 1978, The American Naturalist.

[54]  D. B. Dusenbery Sensory Ecology: How Organisms Acquire and Respond to Information , 1992 .

[55]  Albert D. Carlson,et al.  Flash Communication in Fireflies , 1985, The Quarterly Review of Biology.

[56]  Song modification in the Orthoptera I. Proclamation songs of Platycleis spp. (Tettigoniidae) , 1976 .

[57]  G. Westby,et al.  Electrical communication and jamming avoidance betwen resting Gymnotus carapo , 1979, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[58]  R Zelick Jamming avoidance in electric fish and frogs: strategies of signal oscillator timing. , 1986, Brain, behavior and evolution.

[59]  K. McComb Playback as a Tool for Studying Contests between Social Groups , 1992 .

[60]  Frank E. Hanson,et al.  Control of flashing in fireflies , 1981, Journal of comparative physiology.

[61]  W. A. Snedden,et al.  Nightly calling durations of male sagebrush crickets, Cyphoderris strepitans: size, mating and seasonal effects , 1990 .

[62]  M. Samways Song modification in the Orthoptera. , 1977 .

[63]  J. Fullard,et al.  Phonotactic preferences of female meadow katydids (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae: Conocephalus nigropleurum) , 1978 .

[64]  H. Römer Environmental and Biological Constraints for the Evolution of Long-Range Signalling and Hearing in Acoustic Insects , 1993 .

[65]  R. Robertson,et al.  Neuronal Circuits: An Evolutionary Perspective , 1986, Science.

[66]  M. D. Jones The acoustic behaviour of the bush cricket Pholidoptera griseoaptera. 2. Interaction with artificial sound signals. , 1966, The Journal of experimental biology.

[67]  John A. Doherty,et al.  Phonotaxis in the cricket,Gryllus bimaculatus DeGeer: comparisons of choice and no-choice paradigms , 2004, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[68]  J. Struger,et al.  Acoustic entrainment to randomly generated calls by the frog, Hyla crucifer , 1980 .

[69]  Michael D Greenfield,et al.  Interspecific acoustic interactions among katydids Neoconocephalus: inhibition-induced shifts in diel periodicity , 1988, Animal Behaviour.

[70]  R. Karban INCREASED REPRODUCTIVE SUCCESS AT HIGH DENSITIES AND PREDATOR SATIATION FOR PERIODICAL CICADAS , 1982 .

[71]  F C Hoppensteadt,et al.  Synchronization of periodical cicada emergences. , 1976, Science.

[72]  William H. Cade,et al.  Alternation calling and spacing patterns in the field cricket Acanthogryllus fortipes (Orthoptera; Gryllidae) , 1982 .

[73]  R. Estes Behaviour and Life History of the Wildebeest (Connochaetes taurinus Burchell) , 1966, Nature.

[74]  M. Tejedo Do Male Natterjack Toads Join Larger Breeding Choruses to Increase Mating Success , 1993 .

[75]  A. M. Young,et al.  Temporal Selection for Communicatory Optimization: The Dawn-Dusk Chorus as an Adaptation in Tropical Cicadas , 1981, The American Naturalist.

[76]  T. J. Walker,et al.  Acoustic Synchrony: Two Mechanisms in the Snowy Tree Cricket , 1969, Science.

[77]  Hanson Fe Comparative studies of firefly pacemakers. , 1978 .

[78]  M. K. Tourtellot,et al.  Chorus structure in tarbush grasshoppers: inhibition, selective phonoresponse and signal competition , 1995, Animal Behaviour.

[79]  S. Strogatz,et al.  Synchronization of pulse-coupled biological oscillators , 1990 .

[80]  E. Lewis,et al.  The call-timing algorithm of the white-lipped frog,Leptodactylus albilabris , 1989, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[81]  G. K. Morris,et al.  Bat Predation and Its Influence on Calling Behavior in Neotropical Katydids , 1987, Science.

[82]  The effect of stimulus chirps on a cricket's chirping (Acheta domesticus) , 1969, Zeitschrift für vergleichende Physiologie.

[83]  A. Lall Action spectra for the initiation of bioluminescent flashing activity in males of twilight-active firefly Photinus scintillans (Coleoptera: Lampyridae) , 1993 .

[84]  Onset of Evening Chorus in Tibicen marginalis (Homoptera: Cicadidae) , 1979 .

[85]  K. C. Shaw,et al.  Forum: Role of Weight and Acoustic Parameters, Including Nature of Chorusing, in the Mating Success of Males of the Katydid, Amblycorypha Parvipennis (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae) , 1991 .

[86]  Peter M. Narins,et al.  Chorus dynamics of a neotropical amphibian assemblage: comparison of computer simulation and natural behaviour , 1989, Animal Behaviour.

[87]  B. Sullivan Male Calling Behavior in Response to Playback of Conspecific Advertisement Calls in Two Bufonids , 1985 .

[88]  G. Parker,et al.  An evolutionarily stable strategy approach to indiscriminate spite , 1979, Nature.

[89]  M. West-Eberhard Sexual selection, competitive communication and species specific signals in insects , 1984 .

[90]  Richard D. Alexander,et al.  Studies on the Acoustical Behavior of Seventeen-Year Cicadas (Homoptera: Cicadidae: Magicicada) , 1958 .

[91]  Daniel Otte On Theories of Flash Synchronization in Fireflies , 1980, The American Naturalist.

[92]  Unsynchronized chorusing in the coneheaded katydid Neoconocephalus affinis (Beauvois) , 1983, Animal Behaviour.

[93]  J. Schwartz Why stop calling? A study of unison bout singing in a Neotropical treefrog , 1991, Animal Behaviour.

[94]  D. Tank,et al.  In Vivo Ca2+ Dynamics in a Cricket Auditory Neuron: An Example of Chemical Computation , 1994, Science.

[95]  N. Passmore,et al.  Two-choice phonotaxis in Hyperolius marmoratus (Anura: Hyperoliidae): the effect of temporal variation in presented stimuli , 1988, Animal Behaviour.

[96]  Michael D Greenfield,et al.  Synchronous and Alternating Choruses in Insects and Anurans: Common Mechanisms and Diverse Functions , 1994 .

[97]  J. Krebs,et al.  Mate selection in Pacific tree frogs , 1975, Nature.

[98]  Inhibition and Excitation in the Acoustic Behaviour of Pholidoptera , 1964, Nature.

[99]  F E Hanson,et al.  Synchrony and Flash Entrainment in a New Guinea Firefly , 1971, Science.

[100]  Michael D Greenfield,et al.  Psychoacoustics of female phonotaxis and the evolution of male signal interactions in Orthoptera , 1995 .

[101]  J. Schwartz Male Advertisement and Female Choice in Frogs: Recent Findings and New Approaches to the Study of Communication in a Dynamic Acoustic Environment , 1994 .

[102]  G. K. Morris,et al.  Orthopteran mating systems : sexual competition in a diverse group of insects , 1983 .

[103]  J. G. Morin Symposium: Insect Behavioral Ecology--85: "Firefleas" of the Sea: Luminescent Signaling in Marine Ostracode Crustaceans , 1986 .

[104]  R. Alexander A comparative study of sound production in insects : with special reference to the singing Orthoptera and Cicadidae of the eastern United States , 1956 .

[105]  Richard D. Alexander,et al.  NATURAL SELECTION AND SPECIALIZED CHORUSING BEHAVIOR IN ACOUSTICAL INSECTS , 1975 .

[106]  J. Buck,et al.  Mechanism of Rhythmic Synchronous Flashing of Fireflies , 1968, Science.

[107]  D. Helversen Parallel processing in auditory pattern recognition and directional analysis by the grasshopperChorthippus biguttulus L. (Acrididae) , 1984, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[108]  J. Case COURTING BEHAVIOR IN A SYNCHRONOUSLY FLASHING, AGGREGATIVE FIREFLY, PTEROPTYX TENER , 1980 .

[109]  T. Clutton‐Brock,et al.  THE ROARING OF RED DEER AND THE EVOLUTION OF HONEST ADVERTISEMENT , 1979 .

[110]  R A Wyttenbach,et al.  Demonstration of the precedence effect in an insect. , 1993, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[111]  R. M. Nally On the reproductive energetics of chorusing males: Costs and patterns of call production in two sympatric species of Ranidella (Anura) , 1984 .