ABSTRACT The application of conventional statistical methods to directional data generally produces erroneous results. Various regression models for a circular response have been presented in the literature, however these are unsatisfactory either in the limited relationships that can be modeled, or the limitations on the number or type of covariates admissible. One difficulty with circular regression is devising a meaningful regression function. This problem is exacerbated when trying to incorporate both linear and circular variables as covariates. Due to these complexities, circular regression is ripe for exploration via tree-based methods, in which a formal regression function is not needed, but where insight into the general structure and relationship between predictors and the response may be obtained. A basic framework for regression trees, predicting a circular response from a combination of circular and linear predictors, will be presented.
[1]
Alan J. Lee,et al.
Regression Models for an Angular Response
,
1992
.
[2]
Louis-Paul Rivest,et al.
A decentred predictor for circular-circular regression
,
1997
.
[3]
S. R. Jammalamadaka,et al.
Topics in Circular Statistics
,
2001
.
[4]
R. Tibshirani,et al.
Improvements on Cross-Validation: The 632+ Bootstrap Method
,
1997
.
[5]
Ulric J. Lund.
Least circular distance regression for directional data
,
1999
.
[6]
Richard A. Johnson,et al.
Some Angular-Linear Distributions and Related Regression Models
,
1978
.