Return Postage in Mail Surveys: A Meta Analysis

This paper describes a five-step procedure for meta-analysis. Especially important was the contacting of authors of prior papers. This was done primarily to improve the accuracy of the coding; it also helped to identify unpublished research and to supply missing information. Application of the five-step procedure to the issue of return postage in mail surveys yielded significantly more papers and produced more definitive conclusions than those derived from traditional reviews. This meta-analysis indicated that business reply postage is seldom costeffective because first class postage yields an additional 9% return. Business reply rates were lower than for other first class postage in each of the 20 comparisons.

[1]  David L. Wallace,et al.  A Case For-and Against-Mail Questionnaires , 1954 .

[2]  R. Stevenson,et al.  Increasing Returns in International Mail Surveys , 1974 .

[3]  Frederick Wiseman,et al.  Factor Interaction Effects in Mail Survey Response Rates , 1973 .

[4]  Kevin F. McCrohan,et al.  A Cost/benefit Approach to Postage used on Mail Questionnaires , 1981 .

[5]  J. Feldman.  Meta-Analysis: Cumulating Research Findings Across Studies , 1984 .

[6]  R. Rosenthal,et al.  Statistical versus traditional procedures for summarizing research findings. , 1980, Psychological bulletin.

[7]  Wolfgang Blass-Wilhelms,et al.  Der Einfluß der Frankierungsart auf den Rücklauf von Antwortkarten , 1982 .

[8]  David B. Orr,et al.  Considerations, Costs, and Returns in a Large-Scale Follow-Up Study , 1965 .

[9]  W. Jack Duncan,et al.  Mail Questionnaires in Survey Research: A Review of Response Inducement Techniques , 1979 .

[10]  Robert A. Peterson,et al.  An experimental investigation of mail-survey responses , 1975 .

[11]  John B. Forsythe,et al.  Obtaining Cooperation in a Survey of Business Executives , 1977 .

[12]  Roger A. Kerin,et al.  Methodological considerations in corporate mail surveys: A research note , 1976 .

[13]  L. Kanuk,et al.  Mail Surveys and Response Rates: A Literature Review , 1975 .

[14]  Andrew E. Kimball.  Increasing the Rate of Return in Mail Surveys , 1961 .

[15]  J. Armstrong.  Advocacy and Objectivity in Science , 1979 .

[16]  John F. Veiga,et al.  Getting the mail questionnaire returned: Some practical research considerations. , 1974 .

[17]  Donald S. Longworth.  Use of a Mail Questionnaire , 1953 .

[18]  James R. Harris,et al.  Stamps versus postal permits: A decisional guide for return postage in mail questionnaires , 1980 .

[19]  A. L. Ferriss.  A Note on Stimulating Response to Questionnaires , 1951 .

[20]  D. O. Price.  On the Use of Stamped Return Envelopes with Mail Questionnaires , 1950 .

[21]  David W. Finn,et al.  Response speeds, functions, and predictability in mail surveys , 1983 .

[22]  Gregg B. Jackson,et al.  Methods for Integrative Reviews , 1980 .

[23]  B. Green,et al.  Quantitative methods for literature reviews. , 1984, Annual review of psychology.

[24]  W. Tullar,et al.  A Factor Interactive Investigation of Mail Survey Response Rates from a Commercial Population , 1977 .

[25]  M. Pressley,et al.  A multifactor experiment on the generalizability of direct mail advertising response techniques to mail survey design , 1980 .

[26]  J. Gullahorn,et al.  AN INVESTIGATION OF THE EFFECTS OF THREE FACTORS ON RESPONSE TO MAIL QUESTIONNAIRES , 1963 .

[27]  C. Scott.  Research on Mail Surveys , 1961 .

[28]  R. Rosenthal.  Combining results of independent studies. , 1978 .

[29]  Gerald Linda,et al.  Multiple Criteria Effects in a Mail Survey Experiment , 1978 .

[30]  James R. Harris,et al.  Questionnaire Returns: Stamps versus Business Reply Envelopes Revisited , 1978 .

[31]  T. Heberlein,et al.  Factors affecting response rates to mailed questionnaires: A quantitative analysis of the published literature. , 1978 .

[32]  G. Glass,et al.  Meta-analysis in social research , 1981 .

[33]  E. C. Hammond,et al.  Inhalation in Relation to Type and Amount of Smoking , 1959 .

[34]  Daniel J. Svyantek,et al.  Analyzing meta-analysis: Potential problems, an unsuccessful replication, and evaluation criteria. , 1985 .

[35]  W. E. Hensley.  Increasing Response Rate by Choice of Postage Stamps , 1974 .

[36]  David Labrecque,et al.  A Response Rate Experiment Using Mail Questionnaires , 1978 .

[37]  R G Orwin,et al.  Effects of deficient reporting on meta-analysis: a conceptual framework and reanalysis. , 1985, Psychological bulletin.

[38]  H. Cooper,et al.  A Quantitative Review of Research Design Effects on Response Rates to Questionnaires , 1983 .

[39]  R. A. Robinson,et al.  Making Mail Surveys More Reliable , 1951 .

[40]  A. S. Linsky.  STIMULATING RESPONSES TO MAILED QUESTIONNAIRES: A REVIEW , 1975 .