Measures of baseline intent to use automated vehicles: A case study of Texas cities

Abstract Early consistent measurement of intent to use automated vehicles will help explore the public’s reactions, improve the knowledge base, and facilitate an understanding of the potential benefits that could be achieved. Adopting a car technology acceptance model (CTAM), online surveys were implemented in several Texas cities including 2016 survey of Dallas, Houston, and Waco, which is an extension of a prior 2015 survey study in Austin. Adding different geographic content provided an opportunity to assess trends and to obtain more robust results and different insights on the consumer acceptance and travel behavior impacts of self-driving vehicles. Following an extensive descriptive analyses, a multivariate model was estimated to examine the factors influencing intent to use in Texas cities. The results show an increase in intent to use from 2015 to 2016. Demographic variables mattered but to lesser extent compared to psychosocial variables of the CTAM, which were highly significant in predicting intent to use. Younger individuals, males and individuals with physical conditions that prohibiting them from driving had a higher likelihood of intent to use. Travel behavior characteristics were also important. For example, individuals owning a vehicle with highly automated features had a higher intention to use. The strongest associations with intent to use were observed for attitudes toward self-driving vehicles, performance expectation, perceived safety, and social influence. In moving forward, it will be important to continue to monitor and track the behavior with diverse populations, and build an evidence-based consensus through continuous measurement on intent to use automated vehicles.

[1]  Brice G. Nichols,et al.  Using an Activity-Based Model to Explore Possible Impacts of Automated Vehicles , 2015 .

[2]  Riender Happee,et al.  Public opinion on automated driving: results of an international questionnaire among 5000 respondents , 2015 .

[3]  Michael Sivak,et al.  A Survey of Public Opinion about Autonomous and Self-Driving Vehicles in the U.S., the U.K., and Australia , 2014 .

[4]  E. Rogers,et al.  Diffusion of Innovations , 1964 .

[5]  C. Bhat,et al.  Consumer preferences and willingness to pay for advanced vehicle technology options and fuel types , 2015 .

[6]  K. Kockelman,et al.  Forecasting Americans' Long-Term Adoption of Connected and Autonomous Vehicle Technologies , 2016 .

[7]  K. Kockelman,et al.  Are we ready to embrace connected and self-driving vehicles? A case study of Texans , 2016, Transportation.

[8]  Joseph F. Coughlin,et al.  In-vehicle technology for self-driving cars: Advantages and challenges for aging drivers , 2014 .

[9]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models , 1989 .

[10]  Stephen D. Boyles,et al.  Effects of Autonomous Vehicle Ownership on Trip, Mode, and Route Choice , 2015 .

[11]  Johanna Zmud,et al.  Self-Driving Vehicles: Determinants of Adoption and Conditions of Usage , 2016 .

[12]  S. Haustein,et al.  On sceptics and enthusiasts: What are the expectations towards self-driving cars? , 2018, Transport Policy.

[13]  Suzanne Childress,et al.  Using an Activity-Based Model to Explore the Potential Impacts of Automated Vehicles , 2015 .

[14]  Danielle Dai,et al.  Public Perceptions of Self-Driving Cars: The Case of Berkeley, California , 2014 .

[15]  Eva M. Fraedrich,et al.  Societal and Individual Acceptance of Autonomous Driving , 2016 .

[16]  Justin M. Owens,et al.  Cross-generational acceptance of and interest in advanced vehicle technologies: A nationwide survey , 2015 .

[17]  Pearl Brereton,et al.  Does the technology acceptance model predict actual use? A systematic literature review , 2010, Inf. Softw. Technol..

[18]  Bart van Arem,et al.  Policy and society related implications of automated driving: A review of literature and directions for future research , 2017, J. Intell. Transp. Syst..

[19]  Kara M. Kockelman,et al.  Assessing Public Opinions of and Interest in New Vehicle Technologies: An Austin Perspective , 2016 .

[20]  Gordon B. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View , 2003, MIS Q..

[21]  Rico Krueger,et al.  Preferences for shared autonomous vehicles , 2016 .

[22]  Riender Happee,et al.  A Conceptual Model to Explain, Predict, and Improve User Acceptance of Driverless Vehicles , 2016 .

[23]  Corey D. Harper,et al.  Estimating potential increases in travel with autonomous vehicles for the non-driving, elderly and people with travel-restrictive medical conditions , 2016 .

[24]  Manfred Tscheligi,et al.  Towards Autonomous Cars: The Effect of Autonomy Levels on Acceptance and User Experience , 2014, AutomotiveUI.

[25]  William Payre,et al.  Intention to use a fully automated car: attitudes and a priori acceptability , 2014 .

[26]  Kay W. Axhausen,et al.  Literature review on surveys investigating the acceptance of automated vehicles , 2017, Transportation.

[27]  Michael A. Regan,et al.  Measuring Acceptability through Questionnaires and Focus Groups , 2018, Driver Acceptance of New Technology.