Can alternative indicators overcome language biases in citation counts? A comparison of Spanish and UK research
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Martin Meyer,et al. What is Special about Patent Citations? Differences between Scientific and Patent Citations , 2000, Scientometrics.
[2] Rodrigo Costas,et al. Assessing the Impact of Publications Saved by Mendeley Users: Is There Any Different Pattern Among Users? , 2014 .
[3] J. Martínez,et al. Enciclopedia del español en el mundo: anuario del Instituto Cervantes 2006-2007 , 2006 .
[4] Mike Thelwall,et al. An automatic method for assessing the teaching impact of books from online academic syllabi , 2016, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..
[5] Björn Hammarfelt,et al. Using altmetrics for assessing research impact in the humanities , 2014, Scientometrics.
[6] Lance B. Kurke,et al. Designing a Great Syllabus , 1994 .
[7] Benjamín Vargas-Quesada,et al. Indicadores Bibliométricos de la Actividad Científica Española 2007. Informe 2009 , 2009 .
[8] Mike Thelwall,et al. Assessing the impact of disciplinary research on teaching: An automatic analysis of online syllabuses , 2008 .
[9] Jacques Michel,et al. Patent citation analysis.A closer look at the basic input data from patent search reports , 2001, Scientometrics.
[10] Jesús Rey-Rocha,et al. Why do I publish research articles in English instead of my own language? Differences in Spanish researchers’ motivations across scientific domains , 2015, Scientometrics.
[11] Michael Thelwall,et al. Web Indicators for Research Evaluation: A Practical Guide , 2016, Synthesis Lectures on Information Concepts, Retrieval, and Services.
[12] Mike Thelwall,et al. Web indicators for research evaluation. Part 3: books and non standard outputs , 2015 .
[13] Thed N. van Leeuwen,et al. Language biases in the coverage of the Science Citation Index and its consequencesfor international comparisons of national research performance , 2001, Scientometrics.
[14] Mike Thelwall,et al. Mendeley readership altmetrics for the social sciences and humanities: Research evaluation and knowledge flows , 2014, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..
[15] Vincent Larivière,et al. Benchmarking scientific output in the social sciences and humanities: The limits of existing databases , 2006, Scientometrics.
[16] Ronald Rousseau,et al. A Multi-metric Approach for Research Evaluations , 2022 .
[17] Lucy Holman Rector. Comparison of Wikipedia and other encyclopedias for accuracy, breadth, and depth in historical articles , 2008 .
[18] Mike Thelwall,et al. How is science cited on the Web? A classification of google unique Web citations , 2007, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..
[19] Mike Thelwall,et al. Mendeley readership counts: An investigation of temporal and disciplinary differences , 2016, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..
[20] Mike Thelwall,et al. Validating online reference managers for scholarly impact measurement , 2011, Scientometrics.
[21] Mike Thelwall,et al. Online presentations as a source of scientific impact? An analysis of PowerPoint files citing academic journals , 2008, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..
[22] Victor Henning,et al. Mendeley - A Last.fm For Research? , 2008, 2008 IEEE Fourth International Conference on eScience.
[23] Rodrigo Costas,et al. The thematic orientation of publications mentioned on social media: Large-scale disciplinary comparison of social media metrics with citations , 2015, Aslib J. Inf. Manag..
[24] Mike Thelwall,et al. Disciplinary differences in Twitter scholarly communication , 2014, Scientometrics.
[25] Mike Thelwall,et al. More precise methods for national research citation impact comparisons , 2015, J. Informetrics.
[26] Vicente P. Guerrero-Bote,et al. Journal maps on the basis of Scopus data: A comparison with the Journal Citation Reports of the ISI , 2010 .
[27] Mike Thelwall,et al. National research impact indicators from Mendeley readers , 2015, J. Informetrics.
[28] Peter Kerkhof,et al. Why Do Scholars Use PowerPoint the Way They Do? , 2015 .
[29] Anton J. Nederhof,et al. Bibliometric monitoring of research performance in the Social Sciences and the Humanities: A Review , 2006, Scientometrics.
[30] Philip M. Davis,et al. The effect of the Web on undergraduate citation behavior: A 2000 update , 2002 .
[31] Mike Thelwall,et al. Web indicators for research evaluation. Part 1: Citations and links to academic articles from the Web , 2015 .
[32] Jennifer Phillips,et al. Analysis of reference sources used in drug-related Wikipedia articles. , 2015, Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA.
[33] Mike Thelwall,et al. Web indicators for research evaluation. Part 2: Social media metrics , 2015 .
[34] Mike Thelwall,et al. Webometric research with the Bing Search API 2.0 , 2012, J. Informetrics.
[35] Cassidy R. Sugimoto,et al. Do Altmetrics Work? Twitter and Ten Other Social Web Services , 2013, PloS one.
[36] Curtis J. Bonk,et al. ONLINE TEACHING IN AN ONLINE WORLD , 2001 .
[37] Henk F. Moed,et al. Developing Bibliometric Indicators of Research Performance in Computer Science , 2007 .
[38] Vincent Larivière,et al. Tweeting biomedicine: An analysis of tweets and citations in the biomedical literature , 2013, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..
[39] Gunther Eysenbach,et al. Can Tweets Predict Citations? Metrics of Social Impact Based on Twitter and Correlation with Traditional Metrics of Scientific Impact , 2011, Journal of medical Internet research.
[40] Jason Priem,et al. How and why scholars cite on Twitter , 2010, ASIST.
[41] Ali Ghazinejad,et al. Who Tweets about Science? , 2015, ISSI.
[42] Blaise Cronin,et al. Bibliometrics and beyond: some thoughts on web-based citation analysis , 2001, J. Inf. Sci..
[43] Debora Shaw,et al. Web citation data for impact assessment: A comparison of four science disciplines , 2005, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..
[44] Johan Bollen,et al. Toward alternative metrics of journal impact: A comparison of download and citation data , 2005, Inf. Process. Manag..
[45] Vincent Larivière,et al. Who reads research articles? An altmetrics analysis of Mendeley user categories , 2015, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..
[46] Enrique Orduña Malea. La web social como nuevo medio de comunicación y evaluación científica [Reseña] , 2016 .
[47] John H. Hummel,et al. Constructing the Course Syllabus: Faculty and Student Perceptions of Important Syllabus Components. , 1999 .
[48] David Stuart. Social Media Metrics , 2009 .
[49] Debora Shaw,et al. Can web citations be a measure of impact? An investigation of journals in the life sciences , 2005, ASIST.
[50] Thed N. van Leeuwen,et al. Technological Relevance of Science: An Assessment of Citation Linkages between Patents and Research Papers , 2000, Scientometrics.
[51] Feza Orhan,et al. Prospective teachers’ opinions on the value of PowerPoint presentations in lecturing , 2010 .
[52] George Veletsianos,et al. Higher education scholars' participation and practices on Twitter , 2012, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..
[53] D. Nicholas,et al. Scholarly reputation in the digital age and the role of emerging platforms and mechanisms , 2016 .
[54] Curtis J. Bonk,et al. Twenty-first century college syllabi: Options for online communication and interactivity , 2002 .
[55] Katrin Weller,et al. Citation Analysis in Twitter: Approaches for Defining and Measuring Information Flows within Tweets during Scientific Conferences , 2011, #MSM.
[56] Koenraad Debackere,et al. Traces of Prior Art: An analysis of non-patent references found in patent documents , 2006, Scientometrics.
[57] Mike Thelwall,et al. Mendeley readership altmetrics for medical articles: An analysis of 45 fields , 2016, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..
[58] Daqing He,et al. User participation in an academic social networking service: A survey of open group users on Mendeley , 2014, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..
[59] Szu-chia S. Lo,et al. Scientific linkage of science research and technology development: a case of genetic engineering research , 2009, Scientometrics.
[60] Loet Leydesdorff,et al. International Collaboration in Science: The Global Map and the Network , 2013, ArXiv.
[61] Katrin Weller,et al. Social Software in Academia: Three Studies on Users' Acceptance of Web 2.0 Services , 2010 .
[62] Lutz Bornmann,et al. Do altmetrics point to the broader impact of research? An overview of benefits and disadvantages of altmetrics , 2014, J. Informetrics.
[63] Antal van den Bosch,et al. Estimating search engine index size variability: a 9-year longitudinal study , 2016, Scientometrics.
[64] Bradley M. Hemminger,et al. Scientometrics 2.0: New metrics of scholarly impact on the social Web , 2010, First Monday.
[65] Mike Thelwall,et al. Supplementary Report I to the Independent Review of the Role of Metrics in Research Assessment and Management , 2015 .
[66] Henk F. Moed,et al. Multidimensional assessment of scholarly research impact , 2014, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..
[67] Kim Holmberg,et al. Altmetrics for Information Professionals: Past, Present and Future , 2015 .
[68] Martin Meyer,et al. Academic patents as an indicator of useful research? A new approach to measure academic inventiveness , 2003 .
[69] William Gunn,et al. Social Signals Reflect Academic Impact: What it Means When a Scholar Adds a Paper to Mendeley , 2013 .
[70] Ulrich Schmoch,et al. Tracing the knowledge transfer from science to technology as reflected in patent indicators , 2005, Scientometrics.
[71] 魏屹东,et al. Scientometrics , 2018, Encyclopedia of Big Data.
[72] Mike Thelwall,et al. Patent citation analysis with Google , 2017, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..
[73] Luis Deltell Escolar,et al. La Guía Docente: un reto en el nuevo modelo de educación universitaria , 2012 .
[74] Hsin-Liang Chen,et al. The perspectives of higher education faculty on Wikipedia , 2010, Electron. Libr..
[75] S. Haustein,et al. Characterizing Social Media Metrics of Scholarly Papers: The Effect of Document Properties and Collaboration Patterns , 2015, PloS one.
[76] Brendan Luyt,et al. Improving Wikipedia's credibility: References and citations in a sample of history articles , 2010, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..
[77] Henk Eijkman. Academics and Wikipedia: Reframing Web 2.0+ as a Disruptor of Traditional Academic Power-Knowledge Arrangements. , 2010 .
[78] Zaida Chinchilla-Rodríguez,et al. Coverage analysis of Scopus: A journal metric approach , 2007, Scientometrics.
[79] Mike Thelwall,et al. Introduction to Webometrics: Quantitative Web Research for the Social Sciences , 2009, Introduction to Webometrics.
[80] Elisa Alonso-Jiménez. Una aproximación a Wikipedia como polisistema cultural , 2015 .
[81] John G. Breslin,et al. Understanding how Twitter is used to spread scientific messages , 2010 .
[82] Jian Wang,et al. Citation time window choice for research impact evaluation , 2013, Scientometrics.
[83] Euan A. Adie,et al. Altmetric: enriching scholarly content with article‐level discussion and metrics , 2013, Learn. Publ..
[84] Patricia Jaramillo,et al. Qué hacer con la tecnología en el aula: inventario de usos de las TIC para aprender y enseñar , 2009 .
[85] Mike Thelwall,et al. Search engine coverage bias: evidence and possible causes , 2004, Inf. Process. Manag..
[86] Nicolás Robinson-García,et al. New data, new possibilities: Exploring the insides of Altmetric.com , 2014, ArXiv.
[87] Frans Albarillo,et al. Language in Social Science Databases: English Versus Non-English Articles in JSTOR and Scopus , 2014 .
[88] Herwig Rehatschek,et al. Wikipedia – challenges and new horizons in enhancing medical education , 2015, BMC Medical Education.
[89] Laura María,et al. Web 2.0: Wikipedia como fuente de información sobre las ciencias de la alimentación y de la nutrición , 2013 .
[90] Hyla H. Polen,et al. Scope, Completeness, and Accuracy of Drug Information in Wikipedia , 2008, The Annals of pharmacotherapy.
[91] Susan Breakenridge Fink. The Many Purposes of Course Syllabi: Which are Essential and Useful? , 2012 .
[92] Timothy W. Finin,et al. Why we twitter: understanding microblogging usage and communities , 2007, WebKDD/SNA-KDD '07.
[93] Eric H. J. Spruyt,et al. Changing publication patterns in the Social Sciences and Humanities, 2000–2009 , 2012, Scientometrics.
[94] Rodrigo Costas,et al. Do “altmetrics” correlate with citations? Extensive comparison of altmetric indicators with citations from a multidisciplinary perspective , 2014, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..
[95] Mike Thelwall,et al. Are wikipedia citations important evidence of the impact of scholarly articles and books? , 2017, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..
[96] Liwen Vaughan,et al. Web citation data for impact assessment: A comparison of four science disciplines: Book Reviews , 2005 .
[97] Debora Shaw,et al. Bibliographic and Web citations: What is the difference? , 2003, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..
[98] Julià Minguillón,et al. Wikipedia at university: what faculty think and do about it , 2015, Electron. Libr..
[99] Robert Costanza,et al. Perceived credibility of Internet encyclopedias , 2011, Comput. Educ..
[100] Carmen Marta-Lazo,et al. LA EDUCACIÓN MEDIÁTICA EN LAS TITULACIONES DE EDUCACIÓN Y COMUNICACIÓN DE LAS UNIVERSIDADES ESPAÑOLAS. ANÁLISIS DE LOS RECURSOS RECOMENDADOS EN LAS GUÍAS DOCENTES , 2014 .
[101] Koenraad Debackere,et al. Linking science to technology: Using bibliographic references in patents to build linkage schemes , 2004, Scientometrics.
[102] C. Lee Giles,et al. Scholarly publishing in the Internet age: a citation analysis of computer science literature , 2001, Inf. Process. Manag..
[103] Elena Maceviciute. Review of: Thelwall, Michael. Introduction to webometrics: quantitative web research for the social sciences. San Rafael, CA: Morgan & Claypool, 2009 , 2010, Inf. Res..
[104] José Luis Ortega,et al. Relationship between altmetric and bibliometric indicators across academic social sites: The case of CSIC's members , 2015, J. Informetrics.
[105] Mike Thelwall,et al. Can Mendeley bookmarks reflect readership? A survey of user motivations , 2016, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..
[106] M. Thelwall,et al. Research Blogs and the Discussion of Scholarly Information , 2012, PloS one.
[107] Yao-Tsu Tung. A Case Study of Undergraduate Course Syllabi in Taiwan , 2010 .
[108] Alison J. Head,et al. How Today's College Students use Wikipedia for Course-related Research , 2010, First Monday.
[109] Tara L. Pummer,et al. Reliability of Wikipedia as a medication information source for pharmacy students , 2011 .
[110] Panayiotis Zaphiris,et al. Cultural Differences in Collaborative Authoring of Wikipedia , 2006, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..
[111] Richard E. West,et al. Mendeley: Creating Communities of Scholarly Inquiry Through Research Collaboration , 2011 .
[112] Peter E. Doolittle,et al. Recommended Syllabus Components: What Do Higher Education Faculty Include in Their Syllabi?. , 2010 .
[113] Mike Thelwall,et al. Are scholarly articles disproportionately read in their own country? An analysis of mendeley readers , 2015, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..
[114] Kimberly S. Hamilton,et al. The increasing linkage between U.S. technology and public science , 1997 .
[115] Teresa Welsh. An Evaluation of Online Syllabi in The University of Tennessee College of Communications 1 , 2008 .
[116] Scott Chamberlain,et al. Consuming Article-Level Metrics: Observations and Lessons , 2013 .
[117] Mike Thelwall,et al. Motivations for URL citations to open access library and information science articles , 2006, Scientometrics.
[118] Johan Bollen,et al. How the Scientific Community Reacts to Newly Submitted Preprints: Article Downloads, Twitter Mentions, and Citations , 2012, PloS one.