Evidence on the role of ownership structure on firms' innovative performance

Based on the Knowledge Production Function framework given by Griliches (1979), we slightly modify it so that the innovative output depends upon a set of factors related to the firm internal characteristics and are influenced by the environment. Specifically, regarding the firm internal determinants the effect of the concentration of the ownership, the composition of the boards of directors and the effect of the nature of the ownership (foreign and public) are analyzed. Additionally, in order to capture the determinants of the environment in which the firm operates other variables concerning the internationalization of market, the agglomeration economies and the regional knowledge externalities are also considered. In order to assess the impact of these determinants on the number of patents and models of use awarded by the firm, the discreteness of the latter variable has to be taken into account. We apply Poisson and Negative Binomial models for a more comprehensive evaluation of the hypothesis in a panel of Spanish manufacturing firms. The results show patenting activity is positively favoured by being located in an environment with a high innovative activity, due to the existence of knowledge spillovers and agglomeration economies.

[1]  J. Howells.  The location of research and development: Some observations and evidence from Britain , 1984 .

[2]  R. Levin,et al.  Endogenous Technical Change and Barriers to Entry , 1974 .

[3]  M. Feldman,et al.  Knowledge spillovers and the geography of innovation , 2004 .

[4]  Brian Ashcroft,et al.  Corporate structure, ownership and the likelihood of innovation , 1996 .

[5]  Sokbae Lee,et al.  Is Distance Dying at Last? Falling Home Bias in Fixed Effects Models of Patent Citations , 2007 .

[6]  I. Piquer.  Los proyectos de I+D de las empresas: un análisis empírico de algunas de sus características , 1993 .

[7]  Gerben van der Panne,et al.  Agglomeration externalities: Marshall versus Jacobs , 2004 .

[8]  C. F. Phillips.  Industrial Market Structure and Economic Performance , 1971 .

[9]  D. Czarnitzki,et al.  Management Control and Innovative Activity , 2004 .

[10]  Z. Griliches,et al.  Patents and R and D: Is There a Lag? , 1986 .

[11]  Shorey Peterson,et al.  The Modern Corporation and Private Property. , 1933 .

[12]  Edwin Mansfield,et al.  Industrial Research and Development Expenditures: Determinants, Prospects, and Relation to Size of Firm and Inventive Output , 1964, Journal of Political Economy.

[13]  Lydia Greunz,et al.  Industrial structure and innovation - evidence from European regions , 2004 .

[14]  Corinne Autant-Bernard,et al.  Science and knowledge flows: evidence from the French case , 2001 .

[15]  Leo Sveikauskas,et al.  The Contribution of R&D to Productivity Growth. , 1986 .

[16]  J. Galende,et al.  Internal factors determining a firm’s innovative behaviour , 2003 .

[17]  Steven Klepper,et al.  A Reprise of Size and R & D , 1996 .

[18]  Bruno Crépon,et al.  Research and development, competition and innovation pseudo-maximum likelihood and simulated maximum likelihood methods applied to count data models with heterogeneity☆ , 1997 .

[19]  A. Cameron,et al.  Regression-based tests for overdispersion in the Poisson model☆ , 1990 .

[20]  H. Demsetz,et al.  The Structure of Corporate Ownership: Causes and Consequences , 1985, Journal of Political Economy.

[21]  Scott A. Snell,et al.  External control, corporate strategy, and firm performance in research‐intensive industries , 1988 .

[22]  M. J. Guillén,et al.  Productividad, capital tecnológico e investigación en la economía española , 1985 .

[23]  S. Winter,et al.  An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change.by Richard R. Nelson; Sidney G. Winter , 1987 .

[24]  Yishay Yafeh,et al.  Large Shareholders and Banks: Who Monitors and How? , 2003 .

[25]  Rachel Griffith,et al.  How Special is the Special Relationship? Using the Impact of Us R&D Spillovers on UK Firms as a Test of Technology Sourcing , 2004 .

[26]  M. Feldman,et al.  Innovation in Cities: Science-Based Diversity, Specialization and Localized Competition , 1999 .

[27]  Kornelius Kraft,et al.  Market Structure, Firm Characteristics and Innovative Activity , 1989 .

[28]  A. Shleifer,et al.  A Survey of Corporate Governance , 1996 .

[29]  P. Bishop,et al.  External ownership and innovation in the United Kingdom , 1999 .

[30]  Pravin K. Trivedi,et al.  Regression Analysis of Count Data , 1998 .

[31]  Esteban Fernández Sánchez.  Innovación, tecnología y alianzas estratégicas: factores clave de la competencia , 1996 .

[32]  M. Albert.  Análisis microeconómico de los determinantes de la innovación: aplicación a las empresas industriales españolas , 1997 .

[33]  Peggy M. Lee.  A comparison of ownership structures and innovations of US and Japanese firms , 2005 .

[34]  Ross L. Watts,et al.  The Investment Opportunity Set and Corporate Financing, Dividend, and Compensation Policies , 1992 .

[35]  John Leahy,et al.  Ownership Structure, Control Type Classifications and the Performance of Large British Companies , 1991 .

[36]  Maryann P. Feldman,et al.  Real Effects of Academic Research: Comment , 1992 .

[37]  K. Gugler,et al.  Average q, marginal q, and the relation between ownership and performance , 2003 .

[38]  Mark Casson,et al.  The Entrepreneur: An Economic Theory , 1982 .

[39]  Peggy M. Lee,et al.  Ownership Structures and R&D Investments of U.S. and Japanese Firms: Agency and Stewardship Perspectives , 2003 .

[40]  A. Shleifer,et al.  Management Ownership and Market Valuation: An Empirical Analysis , 1988 .

[41]  G. Dosi.  Sources, Procedures, and Microeconomic Effects of Innovation , 1988 .

[42]  K. Hosono,et al.  Corporate governance and research and development: Evidence from Japan , 2004 .

[43]  R. Blundell,et al.  Market share, market value and innovation in a panel of British manufacturing firms , 1999 .

[44]  Denis Gromb,et al.  Large Shareholders, Monitoring, and the Value of the Firm , 1997 .

[45]  F. Crespi.  Notes on the Determinants of Innovation: A Multi-Perspective Analysis , 2004 .

[46]  P. Beneito.  Choosing among alternative technological strategies: an empirical analysis of formal sources of innovation , 2003 .

[47]  Bruno Crépon,et al.  Research, Innovation, and Productivity: an Econometric Analysis at the Firm Level , 1998 .

[48]  L. Bottazzi,et al.  Innovation and Spillovers in Regions: Evidence from European Patent Data , 2002 .

[49]  J. Schumpeter.  Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy , 1943 .

[50]  A. Shleifer,et al.  MANAGEMENT OWNERSHIP AND MARKET VALUATION* An Em~k~d Amdy~s , 1988 .

[51]  G. Licht,et al.  Patents and R&D: an econometric investigation using applications for German, European and US patents by German companies , 1998 .