Associations between Secondary School Pupils' Definitions of Bullying, Attitudes towards Bullying, and Tendencies to Engage in Bullying: Age and sex differences

A self-report questionnaire about involvement in different types of bullying, what behaviours were regarded as bullying, and attitudes towards bullying, bullies and victims was completed by pupils in Year 7 (aged 11/12) through to Year 10 (aged 14/15) ( n = 170). Overall, direct verbal assault was the most commonly reported, and stealing the least frequently reported, type of bullying. For six specific types of bullying investigated, and for a composite measure of all types of bullying, significantly fewer Year 9 pupils than pupils in the other three years reported that they had behaved in these ways in the previous week. No significant sex differences emerged on these measures. These findings suggest that general patterns in bullying activities as a function of age and sex obtained in previous studies do not always hold. Although most pupils indicated that they thought that six out of eight types of behaviour viewed as bullying by researchers should be regarded as bullying, a substantial minority did not. The present study also extended bullying research by examining associations between pupils' definitions and attitudes towards bullying and their reports of bullying others. For one specific type of bullying, 'Forcing people to do things that they don't want to do', significantly fewer pupils who reported that they had behaved in this way than who reported that they had not done so included it in their definition of bullying. A consistent pattern of significant negative correlations of moderate size between attitudes and self-reported involvement in specific types of bullying were obtained. The implications of these findings for those concerned with tackling bullying in schools were discussed.

[1]  D. Olweus.  Aggression in the schools : bullies and whipping boys , 1978 .

[2]  N. Crick,et al.  Gender differences in children's normative beliefs about aggression: how do I hurt thee? Let me count the ways. , 1996, Child development.

[3]  H. Cowie,et al.  tackling bullying through the curriculum , 2002 .

[4]  K. Lagerspetz,et al.  Is Indirect Aggression Typical of Females? Gender Differences in Aggressiveness in 11- to 12-Year-Old Children , 1988 .

[5]  D. G. Perry,et al.  Victims of Peer Aggression. , 1988 .

[6]  K. Björkqvist,et al.  5 – The Development of Direct and Indirect Aggressive Strategies in Males and Females , 1992 .

[7]  K. Björkqvist,et al.  Of Mice and Women: Aspects of Female Aggression , 1994, Politics and the Life Sciences.

[8]  H. Cooper,et al.  A statistical review of the literature concerning the self-serving attribution bias in interpersonal influence situations , 1980 .

[9]  O. Mihashi.  The Symbolism of Social Discrimination: A Decoding of Discriminatory Language , 1987, Current Anthropology.

[10]  K Rigby,et al.  Bullying among Australian school children: reported behavior and attitudes toward victims. , 1991, The Journal of social psychology.

[11]  Peter K. Smith,et al.  the Sheffield Project: methodology and findings , 2002 .

[12]  Charles D. Barrett.  Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior , 1980 .

[13]  M. Boulton,et al.  Bully/victim problems in middle-school children: Stability, self-perceived competence, peer perceptions and peer acceptance , 1994 .

[14]  G. Miller.  Childhood bullying and teasing: What school personnel, other professionals, and parents can do , 1998 .

[15]  K. Lagerspetz,et al.  Do Girls Manipulate and Boys Fight? Developmental Trends in Regard to Direct and Indirect Aggression , 1992 .

[16]  M. J. Norušis,et al.  SPSS advanced statistics user's guide , 1990 .

[17]  Dale T. Miller,et al.  Self-serving biases in the attribution of causality: Fact or fiction? , 1975 .

[18]  Peter K. Smith,et al.  A Survey of the Nature and Extent of Bullying in Junior/Middle and Secondary Schools. , 1993 .

[19]  Pete Smith,et al.  Types of bullying behaviour and their correlates , 1994 .

[20]  Dennis Child,et al.  The essentials of factor analysis , 1970 .

[21]  C. Arora.  Defining Bullying , 1996 .

[22]  D. Olweus.  Bully/victim problems among schoolchildren: Basic facts and effects of a school based intervention program. , 1991 .

[23]  I. Ajzen,et al.  Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior , 1980 .

[24]  J. Parker,et al.  Peer relations and later personal adjustment: are low-accepted children at risk? , 1987, Psychological bulletin.

[25]  A. M. O'Moore,et al.  Bullying in Dublin Schools , 1989 .

[26]  M. Boulton,et al.  The Effects of a Short Video Intervention on Secondary School Pupils' Involvement in Definitions of and Attitudes towards Bullying , 1996 .

[27]  M. Boulton,et al.  Bully/victim problems among middle school children. , 1992, The British journal of educational psychology.

[28]  M. Boulton,et al.  Twenty years' research on peer victimization and psychosocial maladjustment: a meta-analytic review of cross-sectional studies. , 2000, Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines.