Fully automated nipple detection in digital breast tomosynthesis

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE We propose a nipple detection algorithm for use with digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) images. DBT images have been developed to overcome the weaknesses of 2D mammograms for denser breasts by providing 3D breast images. The nipple location acts as an invaluable landmark in DBT images for aligning the right and left breasts and describing the relative location of any existing lesions. METHODS Nipples may be visible or invisible in a breast image, and therefore a nipple detection method must be able to detect the nipples for both cases. The detection method for visible nipples based on their shape is simple and highly efficient. However, it is difficult to detect invisible nipples because they do not have a prominent shape. Fibroglandular tissue in a breast is anatomically connected with the nipple. Thus, the nipple location can be detected by analyzing the location of such tissue. In this paper, we propose a method for detecting the location of both visible and invisible nipples using fibroglandular tissue and changes in the breast area. RESULTS Our algorithm was applied to 138 DBT images, and its nipple detection accuracy was evaluated based on the mean Euclidean distance. The results indicate that our proposed method achieves a mean Euclidean distance of 3.10±2.58mm. CONCLUSIONS The nipple location can be a very important piece of information in the process of a DBT image registration. This paper presents a method for the automatic nipple detection in a DBT image. The extracted nipple location plays an essential role in classifying any existing lesions and comparing both the right and left breasts. Thus, the proposed method can help with computer-aided detection for a more efficient DBT image analysis.

[1]  Martin Rumpf,et al.  An Adaptive Level Set Method for Medical Image Segmentation , 2001, IPMI.

[2]  Niranjan Khandelwal,et al.  A Heuristic Approach to Automated Nipple Detection in Digital Mammograms , 2013, Journal of Digital Imaging.

[3]  B. Zheng,et al.  Bilateral mammographic density asymmetry and breast cancer risk: a preliminary assessment. , 2012, European journal of radiology.

[4]  D. Kopans,et al.  Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: State of the Art. , 2015, Radiology.

[5]  Gisella Gennaro,et al.  Digital breast tomosynthesis versus digital mammography: a clinical performance study , 2010, European Radiology.

[6]  Klaus D. Tönnies,et al.  Segmentation of medical images using adaptive region growing , 2001, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[7]  Michael Brady,et al.  Automatic Nipple Detection on Mammograms , 2003, MICCAI.

[8]  N. Petrick,et al.  Computerized nipple identification for multiple image analysis in computer-aided diagnosis. , 2004, Medical physics.

[9]  R. J. Ramteke,et al.  Automatic Medical Image Classification and Abnormality Detection Using K-Nearest Neighbour , 2012 .

[10]  Wen-Nung Lie,et al.  Automatic target segmentation by locally adaptive image thresholding , 1995, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[11]  L. Fajardo,et al.  Previous mammograms in patients with impalpable breast carcinoma: retrospective vs blinded interpretation. 1993 ARRS President's Award. , 1993, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[12]  J. Manning,et al.  Breast asymmetry and predisposition to breast cancer , 2006, Breast Cancer Research.

[13]  Jerry L Prince,et al.  Current methods in medical image segmentation. , 2000, Annual review of biomedical engineering.

[14]  Martin J Yaffe,et al.  Digital tomosynthesis: technique. , 2014, Radiologic clinics of North America.

[15]  H.P. Ng,et al.  Medical Image Segmentation Using K-Means Clustering and Improved Watershed Algorithm , 2006, 2006 IEEE Southwest Symposium on Image Analysis and Interpretation.

[16]  Samir Kumar Bandyopadhyay An Approach for registration method to find corresponding mass lesions in temporal mammogram pairs , 2010 .

[17]  David Gur,et al.  Digital breast tomosynthesis: observer performance study. , 2009, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[18]  L. Feldkamp,et al.  Practical cone-beam algorithm , 1984 .

[19]  Mark A Helvie,et al.  Digital mammography imaging: breast tomosynthesis and advanced applications. , 2010, Radiologic clinics of North America.

[20]  Shyr-Shen Yu,et al.  AUTOMATIC NIPPLE DETECTION IN MAMMOGRAMS USING LOCAL MAXIMUM FEATURES ALONG BREAST CONTOUR , 2015 .

[21]  Nico Karssemeijer,et al.  Generating Synthetic Mammograms From Reconstructed Tomosynthesis Volumes , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[22]  Tor D Tosteson,et al.  Digital breast tomosynthesis: initial experience in 98 women with abnormal digital screening mammography. , 2007, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[23]  Federica Zanca,et al.  Two-view and single-view tomosynthesis versus full-field digital mammography: high-resolution X-ray imaging observer study. , 2012, Radiology.

[24]  E. S. de Paredes,et al.  Missed breast carcinoma: pitfalls and pearls. , 2003, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[25]  Huai Li,et al.  Artificial convolution neural network for medical image pattern recognition , 1995, Neural Networks.

[26]  Seung-Hoon Chae,et al.  Detection method of visible and invisible nipples on digital breast tomosynthesis , 2015, Medical Imaging.

[27]  A. Arieno,et al.  Screening for dense breasts: digital breast tomosynthesis. , 2015, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[28]  A. Jemal,et al.  Cancer statistics, 2014 , 2014, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.