Chemical ignition delay of candidate drop-in replacement jet fuels under fuel-lean conditions: A shock tube study

Abstract Ignition delay times were measured behind reflected shock waves under fuel lean, high pressures conditions for conventional (JP-8) and alternative jet fuels — Fischer-Tropsch (F-T), alcohol to jet (ATJ), direct sugar to hydrocarbon (DSHC), and four bio-jet — and a biodiesel-like fuel. The primary goal of this study was to investigate the effect of fuel structure on ignition delay in order to assess differences in fuel ignition delay relative to JP-8. To support this effort, the ignition characteristics of a few hydrocarbons that are proposed as jet fuel surrogate components were also investigated: n-heptane, n-dodecane, m-xylene, n-dodecane/m-xylene blend (77%/23% by volume) and 2,2,4,6,6-pentamethylheptane (iso-dodecane). Two single-pulse shock tubes (heated and non-heated) were used to obtain the current data set. Using argon as the diluent (93% by volume), the experimental conditions covered a pre-ignition temperature range of approximately 980–1800 K at a pressure of 16 ± 0.8 atm and an equivalence ratio of 0.5. Experimental results show negligible differences between the ignition delay times of JP-8, F-T, DSHC, biodiesel, and the four bio-jet fuels. They are very similar to those of n-heptane, n-dodecane, n-dodecane/m-xylene blend and iso-dodecane under similar conditions. However, the ignition delay times of the ATJ were slightly longer at higher temperatures, and similar to iso-dodecane. m-Xylene reported significantly longer ignition delay times than the other fuels tested under identical conditions. Kinetic modeling results show that light branching and carbon chain length of large n-paraffins do not alter ignition delay because the predominant reactions are oxidation of C1-C4 fuel fragments. They also show for the n-dodecane/m-xylene blend that a discernable slowing of ignition delay by fuel decomposition and oxidation of m-xylene occurs at m-xylene concentrations greater than 50% (by mol.). Further testing is required to understand this behavior at stoichiometric and fuel rich conditions. In addition, an empirical correlation was obtained between the global activation energy of the measured ignition delay times for the single paraffinic species and their derived cetane numbers. This contributes to recent efforts aimed to provide relationships between pre-vaporized, homogeneous combustion properties with existing combustion indicators.

[1]  S. Hochgreb,et al.  Relight Imaging at Low Temperature, Low Pressure Conditions , 2008 .

[2]  Ronald K. Hanson,et al.  Shock tube ignition measurements of iso-octane/air and toluene/air at high pressures , 2005 .

[3]  Edwin Corporan,et al.  Ignition and Emission Characteristics of Surrogate and Practical Jet Fuels , 2008 .

[4]  T. Lieuwen,et al.  Fuel Flexibility Influences on Premixed Combustor Blowout, Flashback, Autoignition, and Stability paper addresses the impact of fuel composition on the operability of lean premixed , 2006 .

[5]  S. M. Sarathy,et al.  Comprehensive chemical kinetic modeling of the oxidation of 2-methylalkanes from C7 to C20 , 2011 .

[6]  Ronald K. Hanson,et al.  Fundamental Kinetics Database Utilizing Shock Tube Measurements , 2009 .

[7]  Edward R. Ritter,et al.  THERM: a computer code for estimating thermodynamic properties for species important to combustion and reaction modeling , 1991, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci..

[8]  Thomas J. Bruno,et al.  Comparison of Synthetic Isoparaffinic Kerosene Turbine Fuels with the Composition-Explicit Distillation Curve Method , 2010 .

[9]  Charles K. Westbrook,et al.  Chemical kinetics of hydrocarbon ignition in practical combustion systems , 2000 .

[10]  P. Veloo,et al.  Predicting the global combustion behaviors of petroleum-derived and alternative jet fuels by simple fuel property measurements , 2016 .

[11]  A. Lifshitz,et al.  Chapter 16.4 - Chemical and Combustion Kinetics: 16.4 Single-Pulse Shock Tube , 2001 .

[12]  William J. Pitz,et al.  DETAILED CHEMICAL KINETIC MECHANISMS FOR COMBUSTION OF OXYGENATED FUELS , 2000 .

[13]  Robert C. Hendricks,et al.  Alternate Fuels for Use in Commercial Aircraft , 2008 .

[14]  Marcos Chaos,et al.  Chemical-kinetic modeling of ignition delay: Considerations in interpreting shock tube data , 2010 .

[15]  Ronald K. Hanson,et al.  Jet fuel ignition delay times: Shock tube experiments over wide conditions and surrogate model predictions , 2008 .

[16]  Ronald K. Hanson,et al.  Ignition delay times of conventional and alternative fuels behind reflected shock waves , 2015 .

[17]  Kyungwook Min,et al.  An Ignition Delay Study of Category A and C Aviation Fuel , 2015 .

[18]  Louis J. Spadaccini,et al.  Autoignition characteristics of aircraft-type fuels , 1981 .

[19]  Heinz Pitsch,et al.  Development of an Experimental Database and Kinetic Models for Surrogate Diesel Fuels , 2007 .

[20]  C. Westbrook,et al.  Detailed chemical kinetic oxidation mechanism for a biodiesel surrogate , 2007 .

[21]  M. H. Jones,et al.  Physical and Chemical Analysis of Alcohol-to-Jet (ATJ) Fuel and Development of Surrogate Fuel Mixtures , 2015 .

[22]  Chih-Jen Sung,et al.  A comparative experimental study of the autoignition characteristics of alternative and conventional jet fuel/oxidizer mixtures , 2010 .

[23]  G. Thomas,et al.  Autoignition Characteristics of Gaseous Fuels at Representative Gas Turbine Conditions , 2001 .

[24]  Ronald K. Hanson,et al.  n-Dodecane oxidation at high-pressures: Measurements of ignition delay times and OH concentration time-histories , 2009 .

[25]  C. Westbrook,et al.  A Comprehensive Modeling Study of n-Heptane Oxidation , 1998 .

[26]  C. Westbrook,et al.  A comprehensive detailed chemical kinetic reaction mechanism for combustion of n-alkane hydrocarbons from n-octane to n-hexadecane , 2009 .

[27]  John B. Heywood,et al.  Internal combustion engine fundamentals , 1988 .

[28]  D. Fino,et al.  Influence on the performance and emissions of an automotive Euro 5 diesel engine fueled with F30 from Farnesane , 2014 .

[29]  Fokion N. Egolfopoulos,et al.  Detailed and simplified kinetic models of n-dodecane oxidation: The role of fuel cracking in aliphatic hydrocarbon combustion , 2009 .

[30]  John M. Simmie,et al.  Autoignition measurements and a validated kinetic model for the biodiesel surrogate, methyl butanoate , 2008 .

[31]  C. Westbrook,et al.  Detailed chemical kinetic mechanism for the oxidation of biodiesel fuels blend surrogate , 2009 .

[32]  G. Weisser,et al.  Modelling of combustion and nitric oxide formation for medium-speed DI diesel engines , 2001 .

[33]  G. Adomeit,et al.  Self-ignition of S.I. engine model fuels: A shock tube investigation at high pressure ☆ , 1997 .

[34]  Thomas A. Litzinger,et al.  Combustion Science to Reduce PM Emissions for Military Platforms , 2012 .

[35]  S. Saxena,et al.  A shock tube study of ignition delay in the combustion of ethylene , 2011 .

[36]  M. Navarro,et al.  Experimental and modeling study of C5H10O2 ethyl and methyl esters. , 2007, The journal of physical chemistry. A.

[37]  M. Oehlschlaeger,et al.  A shock tube study of iso-octane ignition at elevated pressures: The influence of diluent gases , 2008 .

[38]  William J. Pitz,et al.  The autoignition of iso-cetane at high to moderate temperatures and elevated pressures: Shock tube experiments and kinetic modeling , 2009 .

[39]  Matthew A. Oehlschlaeger,et al.  A Shock Tube Study of the Ignition of n-Heptane, n-Decane, n-Dodecane, and n-Tetradecane at Elevated Pressures , 2009 .

[40]  A. J. Dean,et al.  Autoignition of surrogate fuels at elevated temperatures and pressures , 2007 .

[41]  K. Das,et al.  Effect of operating conditions of thermochemical liquefaction on biocrude production from Spirulina platensis. , 2011, Bioresource technology.

[42]  B P Mullins,et al.  Spontaneous ignition of liquid fuels , 1955 .

[43]  K. Brezinsky,et al.  High pressure study of m-xylene oxidation , 2011 .

[44]  Other Contributors Are Indicated Where They Contribute.  Python Software Foundation , 2017 .

[45]  Aw Drews.  Standard Test Method for Hydrocarbon Types in Middle Distillates by Mass Spectrometry , 1998 .

[46]  Sandeep Gowdagiri,et al.  A shock tube ignition delay study of conventional diesel fuel and hydroprocessed renewable diesel fuel from algal oil , 2014 .

[47]  Tim Edwards,et al.  Evaluation of Combustion Performance of Alternative Aviation Fuels , 2010 .

[48]  Gerhard Knothe,et al.  Biodiesel and renewable diesel: A comparison , 2010 .

[49]  Thomas J. Bruno,et al.  Comparison of Biomass-Derived Turbine Fuels with the Composition-Explicit Distillation Curve Method , 2011 .

[50]  Yiguang Ju,et al.  The combustion properties of 2,6,10-trimethyl dodecane and a chemical functional group analysis , 2014 .

[51]  M. Rickard,et al.  COMPARISON OF CHARACTERISTIC TIME DIAGNOSTICS FOR IGNITION AND OXIDATION OF FUEL/OXIDIZER MIXTURES BEHIND REFLECTED SHOCK WAVES , 2005 .

[52]  Brian J. McKay,et al.  Properties of Fischer-Tropsch (FT) Blends for Use in Military Equipment , 2006 .

[53]  Robert L. McCormick,et al.  Compendium of Experimental Cetane Numbers , 2014 .

[54]  D. Goodwin,et al.  Cantera: An Object-oriented Software Toolkit for Chemical Kinetics, Thermodynamics, and Transport Processes. Version 2.2.0 , 2015 .