Frequent template switching in postreplication gaps: suppression of deleterious consequences by the Escherichia coli Uup and RadD proteins

Abstract When replication forks encounter template DNA lesions, the lesion is simply skipped in some cases. The resulting lesion-containing gap must be converted to duplex DNA to permit repair. Some gap filling occurs via template switching, a process that generates recombination-like branched DNA intermediates. The Escherichia coli Uup and RadD proteins function in different pathways to process the branched intermediates. Uup is a UvrA-like ABC family ATPase. RadD is a RecQ-like SF2 family ATPase. Loss of both functions uncovers frequent and RecA-independent deletion events in a plasmid-based assay. Elevated levels of crossing over and repeat expansions accompany these deletion events, indicating that many, if not most, of these events are associated with template switching in postreplication gaps as opposed to simple replication slippage. The deletion data underpin simulations indicating that multiple postreplication gaps may be generated per replication cycle. Both Uup and RadD bind to branched DNAs in vitro. RadD protein suppresses crossovers and Uup prevents nucleoid mis-segregation. Loss of Uup and RadD function increases sensitivity to ciprofloxacin. We present Uup and RadD as genomic guardians. These proteins govern two pathways for resolution of branched DNA intermediates such that potentially deleterious genome rearrangements arising from frequent template switching are averted.

[1]  E. Krin,et al.  RadD Contributes to R-Loop Avoidance in Sub-MIC Tobramycin , 2019, mBio.

[2]  S. Ben-Yehuda,et al.  Bacillus subtilis DisA regulates RecA-mediated DNA strand exchange , 2019, Nucleic acids research.

[3]  Judith Oehler,et al.  Factors affecting template switch recombination associated with restarted DNA replication , 2019, eLife.

[4]  Antoine M. van Oijen,et al.  Spatial and temporal organization of RecA in the Escherichia coli DNA-damage response , 2018, bioRxiv.

[5]  S. Percival,et al.  Mode of action of poloxamer‐based surfactants in wound care and efficacy on biofilms , 2018, International wound journal.

[6]  Antoine M. van Oijen,et al.  DNA polymerase IV primarily operates outside of DNA replication forks in Escherichia coli , 2018, PLoS genetics.

[7]  M. Lamers,et al.  Single-molecule studies contrast ordered DNA replication with stochastic translesion synthesis , 2017, eLife.

[8]  J. Loparo,et al.  Single-molecule imaging reveals multiple pathways for the recruitment of translesion polymerases after DNA damage , 2017, Nature Communications.

[9]  D. Cortez,et al.  Functions of SMARCAL1, ZRANB3, and HLTF in maintaining genome stability , 2017, Critical reviews in biochemistry and molecular biology.

[10]  Raquel Herrador,et al.  Replication Fork Slowing and Reversal upon DNA Damage Require PCNA Polyubiquitination and ZRANB3 DNA Translocase Activity , 2017, Molecular cell.

[11]  S. Lovett Template-switching during replication fork repair in bacteria. , 2017, DNA repair.

[12]  M. Osborne,et al.  PCNA ubiquitylation ensures timely completion of unperturbed DNA replication in fission yeast , 2017, PLoS genetics.

[13]  D. Branzei,et al.  Building up and breaking down: mechanisms controlling recombination during replication , 2017, Critical reviews in biochemistry and molecular biology.

[14]  Stephan Uphoff,et al.  Single-molecule imaging of UvrA and UvrB recruitment to DNA lesions in living Escherichia coli , 2016, Nature Communications.

[15]  M. Cox,et al.  Escherichia coli RadD Protein Functionally Interacts with the Single-stranded DNA-binding Protein* , 2016, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[16]  R. Fuchs Tolerance of lesions in E. coli: Chronological competition between Translesion Synthesis and Damage Avoidance. , 2016, DNA repair.

[17]  T. Paz-Elizur,et al.  High-resolution genomic assays provide insight into the division of labor between TLS and HDR in mammalian replication of damaged DNA. , 2016, DNA repair.

[18]  J. Loparo,et al.  Exchange between Escherichia coli polymerases II and III on a processivity clamp , 2015, Nucleic acids research.

[19]  C. Myers,et al.  Genetic Interactions Implicating Postreplicative Repair in Okazaki Fragment Processing , 2015, PLoS genetics.

[20]  Antoine M. van Oijen,et al.  Regulation of Mutagenic DNA Polymerase V Activation in Space and Time , 2015, PLoS genetics.

[21]  M. Cox,et al.  Escherichia coli radD (yejH) gene: a novel function involved in radiation resistance and double‐strand break repair , 2015, Molecular microbiology.

[22]  H. Kaur,et al.  Top3-Rmi1 DNA single-strand decatenase is integral to the formation and resolution of meiotic recombination intermediates. , 2015, Molecular cell.

[23]  Joseph T. P. Yeeles,et al.  Replisome-mediated Translesion Synthesis and Leading Strand Template Lesion Skipping Are Competing Bypass Mechanisms* , 2014, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[24]  F. Ochsenbein,et al.  The Chromatin Assembly Factor 1 Promotes Rad51-Dependent Template Switches at Replication Forks by Counteracting D-Loop Disassembly by the RecQ-Type Helicase Rqh1 , 2014, PLoS biology.

[25]  Cindy Follonier,et al.  Visualization of recombination–mediated damage-bypass by template switching , 2014, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[26]  Joseph T. P. Yeeles,et al.  Regression of Replication Forks Stalled by Leading-strand Template Damage , 2014, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[27]  Michael M. Cox,et al.  Escherichia coli Genes and Pathways Involved in Surviving Extreme Exposure to Ionizing Radiation , 2014, Journal of bacteriology.

[28]  H. Maki,et al.  DNA polymerase IV mediates efficient and quick recovery of replication forks stalled at N2-dG adducts , 2014, Nucleic acids research.

[29]  Heejun Choi,et al.  Nonperturbative Imaging of Nucleoid Morphology in Live Bacterial Cells during an Antimicrobial Peptide Attack , 2014, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[30]  J. Loparo,et al.  Polymerase exchange on single DNA molecules reveals processivity clamp control of translesion synthesis , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[31]  A. Kuzminov The Precarious Prokaryotic Chromosome , 2014, Journal of bacteriology.

[32]  A. Sarasin,et al.  Gap-filling and bypass at the replication fork are both active mechanisms for tolerance of low-dose ultraviolet-induced DNA damage in the human genome. , 2014, DNA repair.

[33]  L. Bočkor,et al.  Comparison of Intraplasmid Rearrangements in Agrobacterium tumefaciens and Escherichia coli , 2013 .

[34]  R. Woodgate,et al.  Translesion DNA polymerases. , 2013, Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology.

[35]  Zhihao Zhuang,et al.  Regulatory role of ubiquitin in eukaryotic DNA translesion synthesis. , 2013, Biochemistry.

[36]  P. Pasero,et al.  Rescuing stalled or damaged replication forks. , 2013, Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology.

[37]  A. Carattoli,et al.  Tandem multiplication of the IS26-flanked amplicon with the bla(SHV-5) gene within plasmid p1658/97. , 2013, FEMS microbiology letters.

[38]  S. Boiteux,et al.  DNA Repair Mechanisms and the Bypass of DNA Damage in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2013, Genetics.

[39]  P. Sung,et al.  Role of Replication Protein A in Double Holliday Junction Dissolution Mediated by the BLM-Topo IIIα-RMI1-RMI2 Protein Complex* , 2013, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[40]  Yun-Jaie Choi,et al.  Antibacterial properties of a pre-formulated recombinant phage endolysin, SAL-1. , 2013, International journal of antimicrobial agents.

[41]  Yiguang Jin,et al.  A multifunctional in situ–forming hydrogel for wound healing , 2012, Wound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair Society.

[42]  B. Michel,et al.  Replication Fork Reversal after Replication–Transcription Collision , 2012, PLoS genetics.

[43]  A. Kuzminov,et al.  Replication Forks Stalled at Ultraviolet Lesions Are Rescued via RecA and RuvABC Protein-catalyzed Disintegration in Escherichia coli* , 2011, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[44]  N. de Wind,et al.  DNA damage bypass operates in the S and G2 phases of the cell cycle and exhibits differential mutagenicity , 2011, Nucleic acids research.

[45]  P. Plevani,et al.  Mind the gap: Keeping UV lesions in check , 2011, DNA repair.

[46]  H. Pospiech,et al.  In Vitro Gap-directed Translesion DNA Synthesis of an Abasic Site Involving Human DNA Polymerases ϵ, λ, and β* , 2011, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[47]  O. Sliusarenko,et al.  High‐throughput, subpixel precision analysis of bacterial morphogenesis and intracellular spatio‐temporal dynamics , 2011, Molecular microbiology.

[48]  S. Lovett,et al.  Toxicity and tolerance mechanisms for azidothymidine, a replication gap-promoting agent, in Escherichia coli. , 2011, DNA repair.

[49]  W. Heyer,et al.  Regulation of homologous recombination in eukaryotes. , 2010, Annual review of genetics.

[50]  D. Branzei,et al.  Replication and Recombination Factors Contributing to Recombination-Dependent Bypass of DNA Lesions by Template Switch , 2010, PLoS genetics.

[51]  S. Kowalczykowski,et al.  Rmi1 stimulates decatenation of double Holliday junctions during dissolution by Sgs1–Top3 , 2010, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[52]  Q. Ping,et al.  New method for ophthalmic delivery of azithromycin by poloxamer/carbopol-based in situ gelling system , 2010, Drug delivery.

[53]  T. Kelly,et al.  Postreplication gaps at UV lesions are signals for checkpoint activation , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[54]  Z. Livneh,et al.  Multiple two-polymerase mechanisms in mammalian translesion DNA synthesis , 2010, Cell cycle.

[55]  N. Costantino,et al.  Oligonucleotide recombination in Gram‐negative bacteria , 2010, Molecular microbiology.

[56]  N. de Wind,et al.  Mammalian polymerase zeta is essential for post-replication repair of UV-induced DNA lesions. , 2009, DNA repair.

[57]  Diarmaid Hughes,et al.  Gene amplification and adaptive evolution in bacteria. , 2009, Annual review of genetics.

[58]  Z. Livneh,et al.  Repair of gaps opposite lesions by homologous recombination in mammalian cells , 2009, Nucleic acids research.

[59]  Mary Ellen Wiltrout,et al.  Eukaryotic Translesion Polymerases and Their Roles and Regulation in DNA Damage Tolerance , 2009, Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews.

[60]  J. Sale,et al.  PCNA ubiquitination and REV1 define temporally distinct mechanisms for controlling translesion synthesis in the avian cell line DT40. , 2008, Molecular cell.

[61]  B. Michel,et al.  Recombination proteins and rescue of arrested replication forks. , 2007, DNA repair.

[62]  R. G. Lloyd,et al.  Replication fork stalling and cell cycle arrest in UV-irradiated Escherichia coli. , 2007, Genes & development.

[63]  S. Mirkin,et al.  Replication Fork Stalling at Natural Impediments , 2007, Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews.

[64]  S. Lovett,et al.  RecA-independent recombination is efficient but limited by exonucleases , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[65]  A. Lehmann,et al.  Gaps and forks in DNA replication: Rediscovering old models. , 2006, DNA repair.

[66]  I. Callebaut,et al.  ATP Hydrolysis Is Essential for the Function of the Uup ATP-binding Cassette ATPase in Precise Excision of Transposons* , 2006, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[67]  S. Lovett,et al.  DNA repeat rearrangements mediated by DnaK-dependent replication fork repair. , 2006, Molecular cell.

[68]  M. Lopes,et al.  Multiple mechanisms control chromosome integrity after replication fork uncoupling and restart at irreparable UV lesions. , 2006, Molecular cell.

[69]  M. Foiani,et al.  The DNA damage response during DNA replication. , 2005, Current opinion in cell biology.

[70]  John R. Battista,et al.  Deinococcus radiodurans — the consummate survivor , 2005, Nature Reviews Microbiology.

[71]  J. Keck,et al.  The HRDC domain of BLM is required for the dissolution of double Holliday junctions , 2005, The EMBO journal.

[72]  S. Lovett Filling the gaps in replication restart pathways. , 2005, Molecular cell.

[73]  B. Michel,et al.  Multiple pathways process stalled replication forks. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[74]  J. Courcelle,et al.  When replication travels on damaged templates: bumps and blocks in the road. , 2004, Research in microbiology.

[75]  B. Michel,et al.  Requirement for RecFOR‐mediated recombination in priA mutant , 2004, Molecular microbiology.

[76]  Ian D. Hickson,et al.  The Bloom's syndrome helicase suppresses crossing over during homologous recombination , 2003, Nature.

[77]  J. Courcelle,et al.  RecA-dependent recovery of arrested DNA replication forks. , 2003, Annual review of genetics.

[78]  R. Fuchs,et al.  Uncoupling of Leading- and Lagging-Strand DNA Replication During Lesion Bypass in Vivo , 2003, Science.

[79]  M. Cox,et al.  C-terminal Deletions of the Escherichia coli RecA Protein , 2003, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[80]  J. Courcelle,et al.  DNA Damage-Induced Replication Fork Regression and Processing in Escherichia coli , 2003, Science.

[81]  M. Cox The nonmutagenic repair of broken replication forks via recombination. , 2002, Mutation research.

[82]  S. Lovett,et al.  Crossing over between regions of limited homology in Escherichia coli. RecA-dependent and RecA-independent pathways. , 2002, Genetics.

[83]  A. Kuzminov Single-strand interruptions in replicating chromosomes cause double-strand breaks , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[84]  M. Cox,et al.  RecA protein promotes the regression of stalled replication forks in vitro , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[85]  R. G. Lloyd,et al.  Formation of Holliday junctions by regression of nascent DNA in intermediates containing stalled replication forks: RecG stimulates regression even when the DNA is negatively supercoiled , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[86]  M. Cox Historical overview: Searching for replication help in all of the rec places , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[87]  R. Larossa,et al.  A genomic approach to gene fusion technology , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[88]  B. Wanner,et al.  One-step inactivation of chromosomal genes in Escherichia coli K-12 using PCR products. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[89]  B. Michel Replication fork arrest and DNA recombination. , 2000, Trends in biochemical sciences.

[90]  Myron F. Goodman,et al.  The importance of repairing stalled replication forks , 2000, Nature.

[91]  S. Lovett,et al.  Expansion of DNA repeats in Escherichia coli: effects of recombination and replication functions. , 1999, Journal of molecular biology.

[92]  M. Cox A broadening view of recombinational DNA repair in bacteria , 1998, Genes to cells : devoted to molecular & cellular mechanisms.

[93]  M. Cox,et al.  Recombinational DNA Repair: The RecF and RecR Proteins Limit the Extension of RecA Filaments beyond Single-Strand DNA Gaps , 1997, Cell.

[94]  M. Cox,et al.  Convenient and reversible site-specific targeting of exogenous DNA into a bacterial chromosome by use of the FLP recombinase: the FLIRT system , 1997, Journal of bacteriology.

[95]  N. W. Davis,et al.  The complete genome sequence of Escherichia coli K-12. , 1997, Science.

[96]  S. Lovett,et al.  Enhanced deletion formation by aberrant DNA replication in Escherichia coli. , 1997, Genetics.

[97]  B. Michel,et al.  DNA double‐strand breaks caused by replication arrest , 1997, The EMBO journal.

[98]  L. Liu,et al.  A replicational model for DNA recombination between direct repeats. , 1996, Journal of molecular biology.

[99]  S. Lovett,et al.  Recombination between repeats in Escherichia coli by a recA-independent, proximity-sensitive mechanism , 1994, Molecular and General Genetics MGG.

[100]  T. C. Wang,et al.  Involvement of RecF pathway recombination genes in postreplication repair in UV-irradiated Escherichia coli cells. , 1994, Mutation research.

[101]  E. Dervyn,et al.  Frequency of deletion formation decreases exponentially with distance between short direct repeats , 1994, Molecular microbiology.

[102]  L. Liu,et al.  recA-independent and recA-dependent intramolecular plasmid recombination. Differential homology requirement and distance effect. , 1994, Journal of molecular biology.

[103]  S. Lovett,et al.  A sister-strand exchange mechanism for recA-independent deletion of repeated DNA sequences in Escherichia coli. , 1993, Genetics.

[104]  B. Van Houten,et al.  Mechanism of action of the Escherichia coli UvrABC nuclease: Clues to the damage recognition problem , 1993, BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology.

[105]  G. Dianov,et al.  Molecular mechanisms of deletion formation in Escherichia coli plasmids , 1991, Molecular and General Genetics MGG.

[106]  M. Cox,et al.  DNA recognition by the FLP recombinase of the yeast 2 mu plasmid. A mutational analysis of the FLP binding site. , 1988, Journal of molecular biology.

[107]  T. C. Wang,et al.  recA (Srf) suppression of recF deficiency in the postreplication repair of UV-irradiated Escherichia coli K-12 , 1986, Journal of bacteriology.

[108]  K. Smith,et al.  recF-dependent and recF recB-independent DNA gap-filling repair processes transfer dimer-containing parental strands to daughter strands in Escherichia coli K-12 uvrB , 1984, Journal of bacteriology.

[109]  T. C. Wang,et al.  Mechanisms for recF-dependent and recB-dependent pathways of postreplication repair in UV-irradiated Escherichia coli uvrB , 1983, Journal of bacteriology.

[110]  A. Sancar,et al.  A novel repair enzyme: UVRABC excision nuclease of Escherichia coli cuts a DNA strand on both sides of the damaged region , 1983, Cell.

[111]  M. Syvanen,et al.  New class of mutations in Escherichia coli (uup) that affect precise excision of insertion elements and bacteriophage Mu growth , 1983, Journal of bacteriology.

[112]  A. Clark,et al.  Defective excision and postreplication repair of UV-damaged DNA in a recL mutant strain of E. coli K-12 , 1977, Molecular and General Genetics MGG.

[113]  A. Clark,et al.  The dependence of postreplication repair on uvrB in a recF mutant of Escherichia coli K-12 , 1977, Molecular and General Genetics MGG.

[114]  K. Smith,et al.  Genetic control of multiple pathways of post-replicational repair in uvrB strains of Escherichia coli K-12 , 1976, Journal of bacteriology.

[115]  S. Sedgwick Genetic and kinetic evidence for different types of postreplication repair in Escherichia coli B , 1975, Journal of bacteriology.

[116]  C. Wilde,et al.  Exchanges between DNA strands in ultraviolet-irradiated Escherichia coli. , 1971, Journal of molecular biology.

[117]  B. Low,et al.  Genetic Location of Certain Mutations Conferring Recombination Deficiency in Escherichia coli , 1969, Journal of bacteriology.

[118]  P. Howard-Flanders,et al.  Discontinuities in the DNA synthesized in an excision-defective strain of Escherichia coli following ultraviolet irradiation. , 1968, Journal of molecular biology.

[119]  C. A. Coulson,et al.  The distribution of the numbers of mutants in bacterial populations , 1949, Journal of Genetics.

[120]  M. O’Donnell,et al.  A proposal: Source of single strand DNA that elicits the SOS response. , 2013, Frontiers in bioscience.

[121]  J. Repar,et al.  Accuracy of genome reassembly in γ-irradiated Escherichia coli. , 2013 .

[122]  O. Hyrien Mechanisms and consequences of replication fork arrest. , 2000, Biochimie.

[123]  J. Steitz,et al.  Identification of a sex-factor-affinity site in E. coli as gamma delta. , 1981, Cold Spring Harbor symposia on quantitative biology.

[124]  P C Hanawalt,et al.  DNA repair in bacteria and mammalian cells. , 1979, Annual review of biochemistry.

[125]  P. Howard-Flanders Repair by genetic recombination in bacteria: overview. , 1975, Basic life sciences.

[126]  B. Wilkins,et al.  DNA replication and recombination after UV irradiation. , 1968, Cold Spring Harbor symposia on quantitative biology.