Heterogeneity of kinase inhibitor resistance mechanisms in GIST

Most GIST patients develop clinical resistance to KIT/PDGFRA tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI). However, it is unclear whether clinical resistance results from single or multiple molecular mechanisms in each patient. KIT and PDGFRA mutations were evaluated in 53 GIST metastases obtained from 14 patients who underwent surgical debulking after progression on imatinib or sunitinib. To interrogate possible resistance mechanisms across a broad biological spectrum of GISTs, inter‐ and intra‐lesional heterogeneity of molecular drug‐resistance mechanisms were evaluated in the following: conventional KIT (CD117)‐positive GISTs with KIT mutations in exon 9, 11 or 13; KIT‐negative GISTs; GISTs with unusual morphology; and KIT/PDGFRA wild‐type GISTs. Genomic KIT and PDGFRA mutations were characterized systematically, using complementary techniques including D‐HPLC for KIT exons 9, 11–18 and PDGFRA exons 12, 14, 18, and mutation‐specific PCR (V654A, D820G, N822K, Y823D). Primary KIT oncogenic mutations were found in 11/14 patients (79%). Of these, 9/11 (83%), had secondary drug‐resistant KIT mutations, including six (67%) with two to five different secondary mutations in separate metastases, and three (34%) with two secondary KIT mutations in the same metastasis. The secondary mutations clustered in the KIT ATP binding pocket and kinase catalytic regions. FISH analyses revealed KIT amplicons in 2/10 metastases lacking secondary KIT mutations. This study demonstrates extensive intra‐ and inter‐lesional heterogeneity of resistance mutations and gene amplification in patients with clinically progressing GIST. KIT kinase resistance mutations were not found in KIT/PDGFRA wild‐type GISTs or in KIT‐mutant GISTs showing unusual morphology and/or loss of KIT expression by IHC, indicating that resistance mechanisms are fundamentally different in these tumours. Our observations underscore the heterogeneity of clinical TKI resistance, and highlight the therapeutic challenges involved in salvaging patients after clinical progression on TKI monotherapies. Copyright © 2008 Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  J. Fletcher,et al.  KIT oncogenic signaling mechanisms in imatinib-resistant gastrointestinal stromal tumor: PI3-kinase/AKT is a crucial survival pathway , 2007, Oncogene.

[2]  J. Fletcher,et al.  Pediatric KIT wild-type and platelet-derived growth factor receptor alpha-wild-type gastrointestinal stromal tumors share KIT activation but not mechanisms of genetic progression with adult gastrointestinal stromal tumors. , 2007, Cancer research.

[3]  M. Bertagnolli,et al.  Mechanisms of sunitinib malate (SU) resistance in gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) , 2007 .

[4]  P. Casali,et al.  c-Kit/PDGFRA Gene Status Alterations Possibly Related to Primary Imatinib Resistance in Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors , 2007, Clinical Cancer Research.

[5]  Narasimhan P. Agaram,et al.  Pathologic and Molecular Heterogeneity in Imatinib-Stable or Imatinib-Responsive Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors , 2007, Clinical Cancer Research.

[6]  C. Antonescu,et al.  The Activity of Sunitinib against Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor Seems to be Distinct from Its Antiangiogenic Effects , 2006, Clinical Cancer Research.

[7]  J. Desai,et al.  Efficacy and safety of sunitinib in patients with advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumour after failure of imatinib: a randomised controlled trial , 2006, The Lancet.

[8]  J. Fletcher,et al.  Molecular correlates of imatinib resistance in gastrointestinal stromal tumors. , 2006, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[9]  J. Fletcher,et al.  Heat shock protein 90 inhibition in imatinib-resistant gastrointestinal stromal tumor. , 2006, Cancer research.

[10]  P. Marynen,et al.  Efficacy of the Kinase Inhibitor SU11248 against Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor Mutants Refractory to Imatinib Mesylate , 2006, Clinical Cancer Research.

[11]  E. Wardelmann,et al.  Polyclonal Evolution of Multiple Secondary KIT Mutations in Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors under Treatment with Imatinib Mesylate , 2006, Clinical Cancer Research.

[12]  Narasimhan P. Agaram,et al.  Comparative Ultrastructural Analysis and KIT/PDGFRA Genotype in 125 Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors , 2006, Ultrastructural pathology.

[13]  M. Heinrich,et al.  PDGFRA mutations in gastrointestinal stromal tumors: frequency, spectrum and in vitro sensitivity to imatinib. , 2005, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[14]  Elisa Rossi,et al.  Increased HER2 gene copy number is associated with response to gefitinib therapy in epidermal growth factor receptor-positive non-small-cell lung cancer patients. , 2005, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[15]  M. van Glabbeke,et al.  RECIST vs. WHO: prospective comparison of response criteria in an EORTC phase II clinical trial investigating ET-743 in advanced soft tissue sarcoma. , 2005, European journal of cancer.

[16]  C. Antonescu,et al.  Acquired Resistance to Imatinib in Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor Occurs Through Secondary Gene Mutation , 2005, Clinical Cancer Research.

[17]  P. Marynen,et al.  Mechanisms of resistance to imatinib mesylate in gastrointestinal stromal tumors and activity of the PKC412 inhibitor against imatinib-resistant mutants. , 2005, Gastroenterology.

[18]  Rossella Bertulli,et al.  Progression-free survival in gastrointestinal stromal tumours with high-dose imatinib: randomised trial , 2004, The Lancet.

[19]  M. van Glabbeke,et al.  Use of c-KIT/PDGFRA mutational analysis to predict the clinical response to imatinib in patients with advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumours entered on phase I and II studies of the EORTC Soft Tissue and Bone Sarcoma Group. , 2004, European journal of cancer.

[20]  A. D. Van den Abbeele,et al.  Kinase mutations and imatinib response in patients with metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumor. , 2003, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[21]  Gerald McMahon,et al.  SU11248 maintenance therapy prevents tumor regrowth after fractionated irradiation of murine tumor models. , 2003, Cancer research.

[22]  N. Pryer,et al.  SU11248 inhibits KIT and platelet-derived growth factor receptor beta in preclinical models of human small cell lung cancer. , 2003, Molecular cancer therapeutics.

[23]  M. Heinrich,et al.  SU11248 is a novel FLT3 tyrosine kinase inhibitor with potent activity in vitro and in vivo. , 2003, Blood.

[24]  Samuel Singer,et al.  PDGFRA Activating Mutations in Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors , 2003, Science.

[25]  A. D. Van den Abbeele,et al.  Efficacy and safety of imatinib mesylate in advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumors. , 2002, The New England journal of medicine.

[26]  M. Heinrich,et al.  KIT mutations are common in incidental gastrointestinal stromal tumors one centimeter or less in size. , 2002, The American journal of pathology.

[27]  B. Druker,et al.  Inhibition of KIT tyrosine kinase activity: a novel molecular approach to the treatment of KIT-positive malignancies. , 2002, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[28]  C. Fletcher,et al.  Immunohistochemical staining for KIT (CD117) in soft tissue sarcomas is very limited in distribution. , 2002, American journal of clinical pathology.

[29]  C. J. Chen,et al.  KIT activation is a ubiquitous feature of gastrointestinal stromal tumors. , 2001, Cancer research.

[30]  S Torihashi,et al.  Blockade of kit signaling induces transdifferentiation of interstitial cells of cajal to a smooth muscle phenotype. , 1999, Gastroenterology.

[31]  S. Hirota,et al.  Gain-of-function mutations of c-kit in human gastrointestinal stromal tumors. , 1998, Science.

[32]  D. Hallahan,et al.  The receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor SU11248 impedes endothelial cell migration, tubule formation, and blood vessel formation in vivo, but has little effect on existing tumor vessels , 2004, Angiogenesis.

[33]  Juthamas Sukbuntherng,et al.  In vivo antitumor activity of SU11248, a novel tyrosine kinase inhibitor targeting vascular endothelial growth factor and platelet-derived growth factor receptors: determination of a pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic relationship. , 2003, Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research.